The feasibility and safety of ventral hernia repairs under local anaesthesia: a systematic review.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Sarah Michael, Afifa Naseer, Munir Tarazi, Bhamini Vadhwana
{"title":"The feasibility and safety of ventral hernia repairs under local anaesthesia: a systematic review.","authors":"Sarah Michael, Afifa Naseer, Munir Tarazi, Bhamini Vadhwana","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-02931-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventral hernias represent a significant global healthcare burden. Repair under local anaesthesia (LA) provides benefits to patients, hospitals and economies. While inguinal hernia repair under LA has been established, this has not translated to other abdominal wall hernias. This systematic review evaluates the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of performing these repairs under LA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted using OVID<sup>®</sup> EMBASE and MEDLINE to review articles published between 1966 and 2023. Thirty-three papers were included examining variables such as type of hernia, complications, cost-effectiveness, LA used and length of stay. All papers were quality assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Papers assessing inguinal hernias were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13,491 patients underwent ventral hernia repair under LA. Complication rates for LA repairs are low, with wound infections and hematomas ranging from 0.3 to 2%. Recurrence rates were also low (0.3-2.5%). Early mobilisation and same-day discharge were notable benefits, with over 97% of patients ambulatory within hours. Postoperative pain was minimal, contributing to high patient satisfaction rates (90-97%). LA repairs proved especially beneficial for high-risk groups, including elderly and frail patients. However, these findings were only seen in hernia defects less than 5 cm. Heterogeneity among study populations, small sample sizes, and lack of standardisation in LA administration were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review supports the broader implementation of LA for ventral hernia repairs in small defects (< 5 cm), demonstrating its safety, feasibility, and patient acceptability. Careful patient selection for standardisation of best practices for LA hernia repairs offers the potential for significant cost-savings with overall favourable outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"229"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12105344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02931-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ventral hernias represent a significant global healthcare burden. Repair under local anaesthesia (LA) provides benefits to patients, hospitals and economies. While inguinal hernia repair under LA has been established, this has not translated to other abdominal wall hernias. This systematic review evaluates the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of performing these repairs under LA.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted using OVID® EMBASE and MEDLINE to review articles published between 1966 and 2023. Thirty-three papers were included examining variables such as type of hernia, complications, cost-effectiveness, LA used and length of stay. All papers were quality assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Papers assessing inguinal hernias were excluded.

Results: 13,491 patients underwent ventral hernia repair under LA. Complication rates for LA repairs are low, with wound infections and hematomas ranging from 0.3 to 2%. Recurrence rates were also low (0.3-2.5%). Early mobilisation and same-day discharge were notable benefits, with over 97% of patients ambulatory within hours. Postoperative pain was minimal, contributing to high patient satisfaction rates (90-97%). LA repairs proved especially beneficial for high-risk groups, including elderly and frail patients. However, these findings were only seen in hernia defects less than 5 cm. Heterogeneity among study populations, small sample sizes, and lack of standardisation in LA administration were noted.

Conclusion: This review supports the broader implementation of LA for ventral hernia repairs in small defects (< 5 cm), demonstrating its safety, feasibility, and patient acceptability. Careful patient selection for standardisation of best practices for LA hernia repairs offers the potential for significant cost-savings with overall favourable outcomes.

局部麻醉下腹疝修补术的可行性和安全性:系统综述。
背景:腹疝是一个重要的全球卫生保健负担。局部麻醉下的修复对病人、医院和经济都有好处。虽然LA下的腹股沟疝修复已经建立,但这还没有转化为其他腹壁疝。本系统综述评估了在LA下进行这些修复的可行性、安全性和有效性。方法:使用OVID®EMBASE和MEDLINE对1966 - 2023年间发表的文章进行系统评价。33篇论文被纳入研究变量,如疝气类型、并发症、成本效益、LA使用和住院时间。所有论文均采用ROBINS-I工具进行质量评估。评估腹股沟疝的论文被排除在外。结果:13491例患者在LA下行腹疝修补术。LA修复的并发症发生率很低,伤口感染和血肿在0.3%至2%之间。复发率也很低(0.3-2.5%)。早期动员和当天出院是显著的好处,超过97%的患者在数小时内就可以走动了。术后疼痛最小,患者满意度高(90-97%)。LA修复被证明对包括老年人和体弱患者在内的高危人群特别有益。然而,这些结果仅见于小于5厘米的疝缺损。注意到研究人群的异质性、小样本量和LA管理缺乏标准化。结论:本综述支持LA在腹疝小缺损修复中的广泛应用(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信