Research Ethics Challenges, Controversies and Difficulties in Intensive Care Units-A Systematic Review of Theoretical Concepts.

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING
Cristina Petrișor, Mara Chirteș, Tudor Magdaș, Robert Szabo, Cătălin Constantinescu, Horațiu Traian Crișan
{"title":"Research Ethics Challenges, Controversies and Difficulties in Intensive Care Units-A Systematic Review of Theoretical Concepts.","authors":"Cristina Petrișor, Mara Chirteș, Tudor Magdaș, Robert Szabo, Cătălin Constantinescu, Horațiu Traian Crișan","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15050164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Research in the intensive care unit (ICU), which involves critically ill patients, families and healthcare professionals, poses significant ethical challenges. The aim of this PRISMA-guided systematic review is to identify major challenges for research ethics in the ICU. <b>Methods:</b> Pubmed and Scopus databases were searched in November-December 2024 for papers discussing theoretical concepts or specific aspects related to ethical issues in ICU research, retaining 70 papers on ICU research challenges, difficulties or controversies. <b>Results:</b> A total of 10 papers described general concepts related to research ethics in the ICU, 16 studies focused on the methodology or some of the study steps, and 6 papers focused on ICU trials, while 38 studies focused on special patient categories or special situations of critical patients. None of the included papers addressed all of the issues we identified regarding the ethical challenges. <b>Conclusions:</b> ICU research is challenging from a moral point of view. Significant ethical difficulties arise during the design and implementation phases, hampering the study's exactness. Being a vulnerable population with limited decision-making capacity and research-associated risks, alternative consent methods need to be considered. This systematic review provides a checklist of aspects that could generate ethical dilemmas and might constitute a starting point in the conduct of research studies, preventing unethical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12114608/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15050164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research in the intensive care unit (ICU), which involves critically ill patients, families and healthcare professionals, poses significant ethical challenges. The aim of this PRISMA-guided systematic review is to identify major challenges for research ethics in the ICU. Methods: Pubmed and Scopus databases were searched in November-December 2024 for papers discussing theoretical concepts or specific aspects related to ethical issues in ICU research, retaining 70 papers on ICU research challenges, difficulties or controversies. Results: A total of 10 papers described general concepts related to research ethics in the ICU, 16 studies focused on the methodology or some of the study steps, and 6 papers focused on ICU trials, while 38 studies focused on special patient categories or special situations of critical patients. None of the included papers addressed all of the issues we identified regarding the ethical challenges. Conclusions: ICU research is challenging from a moral point of view. Significant ethical difficulties arise during the design and implementation phases, hampering the study's exactness. Being a vulnerable population with limited decision-making capacity and research-associated risks, alternative consent methods need to be considered. This systematic review provides a checklist of aspects that could generate ethical dilemmas and might constitute a starting point in the conduct of research studies, preventing unethical research.

重症监护病房研究伦理的挑战、争议和困难——理论概念的系统回顾。
背景:重症监护病房(ICU)的研究涉及重症患者、家属和医疗保健专业人员,提出了重大的伦理挑战。本prisma引导的系统评价的目的是确定ICU研究伦理的主要挑战。方法:检索2024年11 - 12月Pubmed和Scopus数据库中有关ICU研究伦理问题的理论概念或具体方面的论文,保留70篇关于ICU研究挑战、困难或争议的论文。结果:共有10篇论文描述了与ICU研究伦理相关的一般概念,16篇论文关注了方法或部分研究步骤,6篇论文关注了ICU试验,38篇论文关注了特殊患者类别或危重患者的特殊情况。纳入的论文中没有一篇涉及我们确定的有关伦理挑战的所有问题。结论:从道德的角度来看,ICU研究具有挑战性。在设计和实施阶段出现了重大的伦理问题,阻碍了研究的准确性。作为一个决策能力有限和研究相关风险的弱势群体,需要考虑其他同意方法。本系统综述提供了可能产生伦理困境的方面的清单,并可能构成研究行为的起点,防止不道德的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信