Characteristics, Antecedents, and Consequences of Non-Nursing Tasks: A Scoping Review Protocol.

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING
Gaia Magro, Erika Bassi, Stefania Chiappinotto, Gaia Dussi, Elisa Ambrosi, Federica Canzan, Marco Clari, Alessio Conti, Alberto Dal Molin, Alvisa Palese
{"title":"Characteristics, Antecedents, and Consequences of Non-Nursing Tasks: A Scoping Review Protocol.","authors":"Gaia Magro, Erika Bassi, Stefania Chiappinotto, Gaia Dussi, Elisa Ambrosi, Federica Canzan, Marco Clari, Alessio Conti, Alberto Dal Molin, Alvisa Palese","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15050153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Nurses report that they often must perform activities outside their area of expertise, referred to as \"non-nursing tasks\". The time spent on simple tasks undermines nursing capacity, which is already challenged by the dramatic shortage of nurses. Performing non-nursing tasks affects nurses' satisfaction and their intention to stay. However, despite their relevance, there is no summary of studies on non-nursing tasks. The aim of this study is to summarize available evidence on characteristics of non-nursing tasks, their antecedents, and consequences, to identify gaps in the existing literature and to make recommendations for management, education, practice, and nursing research. <b>Methods</b>: A scoping review will be conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews, and the Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice and research framework will be used to report and summarize the findings. <b>Results</b>: Findings will provide a map regarding the main patterns of research in this area and the evidence produced to date. Two main lines of findings are expected, namely the conceptual and the empirical. The former may contribute to the understanding of the terminology and concept used so far to clearly express non-nursing tasks; the empirical evidence may shed light on frequencies, instruments, reasons, and effects. <b>Discussion</b>: An analysis of non-nursing tasks will provide healthcare organizations with a conceptual framework of all variations in the phenomenon and will help managers to identify the activities that will fall within this conceptual construct. The establishment of a research strand in this field, based on a science-based review involving international stakeholders, can strengthen global action to prevent the occurrence of non-nursing tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12114207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15050153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nurses report that they often must perform activities outside their area of expertise, referred to as "non-nursing tasks". The time spent on simple tasks undermines nursing capacity, which is already challenged by the dramatic shortage of nurses. Performing non-nursing tasks affects nurses' satisfaction and their intention to stay. However, despite their relevance, there is no summary of studies on non-nursing tasks. The aim of this study is to summarize available evidence on characteristics of non-nursing tasks, their antecedents, and consequences, to identify gaps in the existing literature and to make recommendations for management, education, practice, and nursing research. Methods: A scoping review will be conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews, and the Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice and research framework will be used to report and summarize the findings. Results: Findings will provide a map regarding the main patterns of research in this area and the evidence produced to date. Two main lines of findings are expected, namely the conceptual and the empirical. The former may contribute to the understanding of the terminology and concept used so far to clearly express non-nursing tasks; the empirical evidence may shed light on frequencies, instruments, reasons, and effects. Discussion: An analysis of non-nursing tasks will provide healthcare organizations with a conceptual framework of all variations in the phenomenon and will help managers to identify the activities that will fall within this conceptual construct. The establishment of a research strand in this field, based on a science-based review involving international stakeholders, can strengthen global action to prevent the occurrence of non-nursing tasks.

非护理任务的特征、前因和后果:一项范围审查方案。
背景:护士报告说,他们经常必须执行他们的专业领域之外的活动,被称为“非护理任务”。花费在简单任务上的时间削弱了护理能力,而护士的严重短缺已经对护理能力提出了挑战。执行非护理任务会影响护士的满意度和留任意愿。然而,尽管它们具有相关性,但没有对非护理任务的研究总结。本研究的目的是总结关于非护理任务的特征、其前因和后果的现有证据,以确定现有文献中的空白,并为管理、教育、实践和护理研究提出建议。方法:将使用Arksey和O'Malley的方法框架进行范围审查。系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目扩展范围评价,模式,进展,差距,实践和研究的证据框架将用于报告和总结研究结果。结果:研究结果将提供关于该领域研究的主要模式和迄今为止产生的证据的地图。预期的研究结果有两条主线,即概念和实证。前者可能有助于理解迄今为止用于明确表达非护理任务的术语和概念;经验证据可能会揭示频率、工具、原因和影响。讨论:对非护理任务的分析将为医疗保健组织提供这一现象的所有变化的概念框架,并将帮助管理人员确定属于这一概念结构的活动。在涉及国际利益攸关方的科学审查基础上建立这一领域的研究链,可以加强全球行动,防止发生非护理任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信