[Conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for predicting cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma].

Q4 Medicine
C Liu, W Ma, X W Chen, L Chen, M Pan, Y S Li, X L Liu, G H Hu
{"title":"[Conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for predicting cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma].","authors":"C Liu, W Ma, X W Chen, L Chen, M Pan, Y S Li, X L Liu, G H Hu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20240921-00538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of conventional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for detecting cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective case control study included 259 patients (249 males and 10 females,aged 40-88 years with a median age of 63 years) who were pathologically diagnosed with HNSCC at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from April 2022 to August 2024. A total of 259 lymph nodes were assessed(78 pathologically positive nodes and 181 pathologically negative ones). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to compare the diagnostic efficacies of conventional ultrasound combined with CEUS and CT, MRI, or conventional ultrasound for cervical lymph node metastasis. Patients were randomly assigned to a training group (<i>n</i>=208) and a validation group (<i>n</i>=51) (8∶2). Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression were used to analyze the independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis prediction. A nomogram model was constructed based on independent risk factors. The model predictive efficacy was assessed by ROC curve, and model's fit was evaluated by <i>Hosmer-Lemeshow</i> test. <b>Results:</b> The area under the curve (AUC) for conventional ultrasound combined with CEUS in predicting cervical lymph node metastasis in HNSCC was 0.923 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.880-0.965), which was significantly higher than those for enhanced CT, cervical enhanced MRI, and conventional ultrasound [AUC were 0.820 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.753-0.886), 0.802 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.737-0.866), and0.836 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.774-0.899), respectively].There were no statistically significant differences in clinical data between the two groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). Univariate Logistic regression analysis showed that, among contrast-enhanced ultrasound features, the centripetal perfusion pattern, irregular perfusion defect type, and uneven distribution of contrast agent were significantly associated with cervical lymph node metastasis (all <i>P</i><0.05). Among conventional ultrasound features, L/S ratio≤1.5, heterogeneous internal echoes, uneven cortex thickening, blurred corticomedullary boundary, loss of lymphatic gate structure, and peripheral or mixed type on color Doppler flow imaging were significantly associated with cervical lymph node metastasis (all <i>P</i><0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated that the centripetal perfusion pattern, heterogeneous internal echoes, and uneven cortical thickening were independent risk factors for cervical lymph node metastasis (all <i>P</i><0.05). A nomogram model was constructed based on the above independent risk factors, and offered an AUC of 0.933 (95%<i>CI</i>:0.890-0.976) in the training group, which was significantly higher than that for enhanced CT, enhanced MRI, conventional ultrasound, and conventional ultrasound combined with CEUS [AUC were 0.818 (95%<i>CI</i>:0.747-0.890), 0.807 (95%<i>CI</i>:0.739-0.875), 0.842 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.777-0.908), and 0.921 (95%<i>CI</i>:0.876-0.967), respectively]. In the validation group, the AUC was 0.866 (95%<i>CI</i>:0.703-1.000), which was higher than that for cervical enhanced CT, enhanced MRI, and conventional ultrasound [AUC were 0.820 (95%<i>CI</i>:0.613-1.000), 0.711 (95%<i>CI</i>:0.478-0.943), and 0.748 (95%<i>CI</i>:0.515-0.982), respectively]. <b>Conclusion:</b> The combination of conventional ultrasound and CEUS has significant clinical application value in predicting cervical lymph node metastasis in HNSCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23987,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","volume":"60 5","pages":"496-504"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20240921-00538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of conventional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for detecting cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Methods: This retrospective case control study included 259 patients (249 males and 10 females,aged 40-88 years with a median age of 63 years) who were pathologically diagnosed with HNSCC at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from April 2022 to August 2024. A total of 259 lymph nodes were assessed(78 pathologically positive nodes and 181 pathologically negative ones). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to compare the diagnostic efficacies of conventional ultrasound combined with CEUS and CT, MRI, or conventional ultrasound for cervical lymph node metastasis. Patients were randomly assigned to a training group (n=208) and a validation group (n=51) (8∶2). Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression were used to analyze the independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis prediction. A nomogram model was constructed based on independent risk factors. The model predictive efficacy was assessed by ROC curve, and model's fit was evaluated by Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) for conventional ultrasound combined with CEUS in predicting cervical lymph node metastasis in HNSCC was 0.923 (95%CI: 0.880-0.965), which was significantly higher than those for enhanced CT, cervical enhanced MRI, and conventional ultrasound [AUC were 0.820 (95%CI: 0.753-0.886), 0.802 (95%CI: 0.737-0.866), and0.836 (95%CI: 0.774-0.899), respectively].There were no statistically significant differences in clinical data between the two groups (all P>0.05). Univariate Logistic regression analysis showed that, among contrast-enhanced ultrasound features, the centripetal perfusion pattern, irregular perfusion defect type, and uneven distribution of contrast agent were significantly associated with cervical lymph node metastasis (all P<0.05). Among conventional ultrasound features, L/S ratio≤1.5, heterogeneous internal echoes, uneven cortex thickening, blurred corticomedullary boundary, loss of lymphatic gate structure, and peripheral or mixed type on color Doppler flow imaging were significantly associated with cervical lymph node metastasis (all P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated that the centripetal perfusion pattern, heterogeneous internal echoes, and uneven cortical thickening were independent risk factors for cervical lymph node metastasis (all P<0.05). A nomogram model was constructed based on the above independent risk factors, and offered an AUC of 0.933 (95%CI:0.890-0.976) in the training group, which was significantly higher than that for enhanced CT, enhanced MRI, conventional ultrasound, and conventional ultrasound combined with CEUS [AUC were 0.818 (95%CI:0.747-0.890), 0.807 (95%CI:0.739-0.875), 0.842 (95%CI: 0.777-0.908), and 0.921 (95%CI:0.876-0.967), respectively]. In the validation group, the AUC was 0.866 (95%CI:0.703-1.000), which was higher than that for cervical enhanced CT, enhanced MRI, and conventional ultrasound [AUC were 0.820 (95%CI:0.613-1.000), 0.711 (95%CI:0.478-0.943), and 0.748 (95%CI:0.515-0.982), respectively]. Conclusion: The combination of conventional ultrasound and CEUS has significant clinical application value in predicting cervical lymph node metastasis in HNSCC.

[常规超声与增强超声对头颈部鳞状细胞癌颈部淋巴结转移的预测]。
目的:评价常规超声联合超声造影(CEUS)对头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)颈部淋巴结转移的诊断效果。方法:本回顾性病例对照研究纳入了2022年4月至2024年8月重庆医科大学第一附属医院病理诊断为HNSCC的259例患者(男性249例,女性10例,年龄40 ~ 88岁,中位年龄63岁)。共检查259个淋巴结(病理阳性78个,病理阴性181个)。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,比较常规超声联合超声造影与CT、MRI或常规超声对颈部淋巴结转移的诊断效果。患者随机分为训练组(n=208)和验证组(n=51)(8∶2)。采用单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析预测淋巴结转移的独立危险因素。基于独立的危险因素,构建了nomogram模型。采用ROC曲线评估模型的预测效果,采用Hosmer-Lemeshow检验评估模型的拟合。结果:常规超声联合超声造影预测HNSCC颈部淋巴结转移的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.923 (95%CI: 0.880 ~ 0.965),显著高于增强CT、宫颈增强MRI和常规超声[AUC分别为0.820 (95%CI: 0.753 ~ 0.886)、0.802 (95%CI: 0.737 ~ 0.866)、0.836 (95%CI: 0.774 ~ 0.899)]。两组临床资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。单因素Logistic回归分析显示,超声造影增强特征中,训练组向心性灌注模式、灌注缺陷类型不规则、造影剂分布不均匀与颈淋巴结转移显著相关(PPPCI均为0.890-0.976),显著高于CT增强、MRI增强、常规超声、常规超声联合超声造影(CEUS) [AUC分别为0.818 (95%CI:0.747 ~ 0.890)、0.807 (95%CI:0.739 ~ 0.875)、0.842 (95%CI: 0.777 ~ 0.908)、0.921 (95%CI:0.876 ~ 0.967)]。验证组的AUC为0.866 (95%CI:0.703 ~ 1.000),高于宫颈增强CT、增强MRI、常规超声的AUC [AUC分别为0.820 (95%CI:0.613 ~ 1.000)、0.711 (95%CI:0.478 ~ 0.943)、0.748 (95%CI:0.515 ~ 0.982)]。结论:常规超声联合超声造影对预测HNSCC颈部淋巴结转移具有重要的临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12432
期刊介绍: Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery is a high-level medical science and technology journal sponsored and published directly by the Chinese Medical Association, reflecting the significant research progress in the field of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery in China, and striving to promote the domestic and international academic exchanges for the purpose of running the journal. Over the years, the journal has been ranked first in the total citation frequency list of national scientific and technical journals published by the Documentation and Intelligence Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the China Science Citation Database, and has always ranked first among the scientific and technical journals in the related fields. Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery has been included in the authoritative databases PubMed, Chinese core journals, CSCD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信