A Deep Learning Algorithm for Multi-Source Data Fusion to Predict Effluent Quality of Wastewater Treatment Plant.

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Toxics Pub Date : 2025-04-27 DOI:10.3390/toxics13050349
Shitao Zhang, Jiafei Cao, Yang Gao, Fangfang Sun, Yong Yang
{"title":"A Deep Learning Algorithm for Multi-Source Data Fusion to Predict Effluent Quality of Wastewater Treatment Plant.","authors":"Shitao Zhang, Jiafei Cao, Yang Gao, Fangfang Sun, Yong Yang","doi":"10.3390/toxics13050349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The operational complexity of wastewater treatment systems mainly stems from the diversity of influent characteristics and the nonlinear nature of the treatment process. Together, these factors make the control of effluent quality in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) difficult to manage effectively. To address this challenge, constructing accurate effluent quality models for WWTPs can not only mitigate these complexities, but also provide critical decision support for operational management. In this research, we introduce a deep learning method that fuses multi-source data. This method utilises various indicators to comprehensively analyse and predict the quality of effluent water: water quantity data, process data, energy consumption data, and water quality data. To assess the efficacy of this method, a case study was carried out at an industrial effluent treatment plant (IETP) in Anhui Province, China. Deep learning algorithms including long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) were found to have a favourable prediction performance by comparing with traditional machine learning algorithms (random forest, RF) and multi-layer perceptron (MLP). The results show that the R<sup>2</sup> of LSTM and GRU is 1.36%~31.82% higher than that of MLP and 9.10%~47.75% higher than that of traditional machine learning algorithms. Finally, the RReliefF approach was used to identify the key parameters affecting the water quality behaviour of IETP effluent, and it was found that, by optimising the multi-source feature structure, not only the monitoring and management strategies can be optimised, but also the modelling efficiency of the model can be further improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":23195,"journal":{"name":"Toxics","volume":"13 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12115653/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13050349","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The operational complexity of wastewater treatment systems mainly stems from the diversity of influent characteristics and the nonlinear nature of the treatment process. Together, these factors make the control of effluent quality in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) difficult to manage effectively. To address this challenge, constructing accurate effluent quality models for WWTPs can not only mitigate these complexities, but also provide critical decision support for operational management. In this research, we introduce a deep learning method that fuses multi-source data. This method utilises various indicators to comprehensively analyse and predict the quality of effluent water: water quantity data, process data, energy consumption data, and water quality data. To assess the efficacy of this method, a case study was carried out at an industrial effluent treatment plant (IETP) in Anhui Province, China. Deep learning algorithms including long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) were found to have a favourable prediction performance by comparing with traditional machine learning algorithms (random forest, RF) and multi-layer perceptron (MLP). The results show that the R2 of LSTM and GRU is 1.36%~31.82% higher than that of MLP and 9.10%~47.75% higher than that of traditional machine learning algorithms. Finally, the RReliefF approach was used to identify the key parameters affecting the water quality behaviour of IETP effluent, and it was found that, by optimising the multi-source feature structure, not only the monitoring and management strategies can be optimised, but also the modelling efficiency of the model can be further improved.

基于深度学习的多源数据融合预测污水处理厂出水水质。
污水处理系统运行的复杂性主要源于进水特性的多样性和处理过程的非线性。综上所述,这些因素使得污水处理厂出水水质控制难以有效管理。为了应对这一挑战,为污水处理厂构建准确的污水质量模型不仅可以减轻这些复杂性,还可以为运营管理提供关键的决策支持。在本研究中,我们引入了一种融合多源数据的深度学习方法。该方法利用水量数据、工艺数据、能耗数据、水质数据等多种指标对出水水质进行综合分析和预测。为了评估该方法的有效性,在中国安徽省的一家工业废水处理厂(IETP)进行了案例研究。通过与传统机器学习算法(随机森林,RF)和多层感知器(MLP)的比较,发现包括长短期记忆(LSTM)和门控循环单元(GRU)在内的深度学习算法具有良好的预测性能。结果表明,LSTM和GRU的R2比MLP高1.36%~31.82%,比传统机器学习算法高9.10%~47.75%。最后,利用RReliefF方法对影响IETP出水水质行为的关键参数进行识别,发现通过对多源特征结构进行优化,不仅可以优化监测和管理策略,还可以进一步提高模型的建模效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Toxics
Toxics Chemical Engineering-Chemical Health and Safety
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.90%
发文量
681
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxics (ISSN 2305-6304) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of toxic chemicals and materials. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in detail. There is, therefore, no restriction on the maximum length of the papers, although authors should write their papers in a clear and concise way. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of calculations and experimental procedure can be deposited as supplementary material, if it is not possible to publish them along with the text.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信