Clinical Comparison of Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine With Ketamine-Propofol During Canine Orchiectomy: A Randomized Study.

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Mumin Gokhan Senocak
{"title":"Clinical Comparison of Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine With Ketamine-Propofol During Canine Orchiectomy: A Randomized Study.","authors":"Mumin Gokhan Senocak","doi":"10.1002/vms3.70412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effects of two different protocols, ketamine with dexmedetomidine (ketamine-dexmedetomidine [KD]) and ketamine with propofol (ketamine-propofol [KP]), on intubation time, selected cardiopulmonary parameters, and anaesthesia maintenance during canine orchiectomy in a clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Twenty-six healthy dogs were undergoing orchiectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Dogs were randomly assigned to the KD group [n = 13; single intravenous bolus of ketamine (5 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>) combined with dexmedetomidine (10 µg kg<sup>-1</sup>)], or KP group [n = 13, an intravenous bolus of ketamine combined with propofol at a 1:2 concentration ratio and infused at a 0.2 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup> rate for 120 s until jaw relaxation and the consumed amount recorded]. Orotracheal intubation followed the induction of anaesthesia. The cardiopulmonary variables were assessed at baseline and 5-min intervals up to 30 min. A 20% increase in at least two variables, such as heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and respiratory rate, prompted the administration of top-ups. Following surgery, the recovery time and quality were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in intubation time between KD (3.3 ± 0.8) and KP (2.7 ± 0.9, p = 0.121). Over time, HR and MAP significantly increased in the KP group compared to the KD group (p < 0.001). The haemoglobin oxygen saturation was higher in the KD group (97.7% ± 2.1%) compared to the KP (95.3% ± 2.2%, p = 0.015). The duration of the top-up requirement was longer in the KD group as compared to a single bolus of KP, with a mean difference of 31.2 min (95% CI 20.80-41.51) (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical relevance: </strong>Both KP and KD combinations effectively maintain anaesthesia during canine castration surgery, demonstrating comparable intubation times. Although KP requires additional top-ups, it potentially offers enhanced cardiovascular stability compared to KD. However, the use of KP necessitates support of body temperature and oxygenation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23543,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Medicine and Science","volume":"11 3","pages":"e70412"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12106033/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Medicine and Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.70412","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of two different protocols, ketamine with dexmedetomidine (ketamine-dexmedetomidine [KD]) and ketamine with propofol (ketamine-propofol [KP]), on intubation time, selected cardiopulmonary parameters, and anaesthesia maintenance during canine orchiectomy in a clinical setting.

Study design: Randomized clinical trial.

Animals: Twenty-six healthy dogs were undergoing orchiectomy.

Methods: Dogs were randomly assigned to the KD group [n = 13; single intravenous bolus of ketamine (5 mg kg-1) combined with dexmedetomidine (10 µg kg-1)], or KP group [n = 13, an intravenous bolus of ketamine combined with propofol at a 1:2 concentration ratio and infused at a 0.2 mL kg-1 min-1 rate for 120 s until jaw relaxation and the consumed amount recorded]. Orotracheal intubation followed the induction of anaesthesia. The cardiopulmonary variables were assessed at baseline and 5-min intervals up to 30 min. A 20% increase in at least two variables, such as heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and respiratory rate, prompted the administration of top-ups. Following surgery, the recovery time and quality were assessed.

Results: There was no significant difference in intubation time between KD (3.3 ± 0.8) and KP (2.7 ± 0.9, p = 0.121). Over time, HR and MAP significantly increased in the KP group compared to the KD group (p < 0.001). The haemoglobin oxygen saturation was higher in the KD group (97.7% ± 2.1%) compared to the KP (95.3% ± 2.2%, p = 0.015). The duration of the top-up requirement was longer in the KD group as compared to a single bolus of KP, with a mean difference of 31.2 min (95% CI 20.80-41.51) (p < 0.01).

Conclusions and clinical relevance: Both KP and KD combinations effectively maintain anaesthesia during canine castration surgery, demonstrating comparable intubation times. Although KP requires additional top-ups, it potentially offers enhanced cardiovascular stability compared to KD. However, the use of KP necessitates support of body temperature and oxygenation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

氯胺酮-右美托咪定与氯胺酮-异丙酚在犬睾丸切除术中的临床比较:一项随机研究。
目的:比较氯胺酮与右美托咪定(氯胺酮-右美托咪定[KD])和氯胺酮与异丙酚(氯胺酮-异丙酚[KP])两种不同方案在临床犬睾丸切除术中对插管时间、心肺参数选择和麻醉维持的影响。研究设计:随机临床试验。动物:26只健康犬接受睾丸切除术。方法:随机分为KD组[n = 13;单次静脉注射氯胺酮(5 mg kg-1)联合右美托咪定(10µg kg-1)],或KP组[n = 13,氯胺酮联合异丙酚(0.2 mL kg-1 min-1),按1:2的浓度比静脉注射,持续120s,直至颌骨松弛并记录摄入量]。经气管插管后行麻醉诱导。在基线和5分钟间隔至30分钟时评估心肺变量。至少有两个变量增加20%,如心率(HR),平均动脉压(MAP)和呼吸频率,提示给予充值。术后评估恢复时间和质量。结果:两组插管时间KD(3.3±0.8)与KP(2.7±0.9,p = 0.121)差异无统计学意义。随着时间的推移,与KD组相比,KP组的HR和MAP显著增加(p结论和临床相关性:KP和KD联合用药在犬去势手术期间都能有效维持麻醉,插管时间相当。虽然KP需要额外的补充,但与KD相比,它可能提供更好的心血管稳定性。然而,KP的使用需要体温和氧合的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Medicine and Science
Veterinary Medicine and Science Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
296
期刊介绍: Veterinary Medicine and Science is the peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of veterinary medicine and science. The journal aims to serve the research community by providing a vehicle for authors wishing to publish interesting and high quality work in both fundamental and clinical veterinary medicine and science. Veterinary Medicine and Science publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper. We aim to be a truly global forum for high-quality research in veterinary medicine and science, and believe that the best research should be published and made widely accessible as quickly as possible. Veterinary Medicine and Science publishes papers submitted directly to the journal and those referred from a select group of prestigious journals published by Wiley-Blackwell. Veterinary Medicine and Science is a Wiley Open Access journal, one of a new series of peer-reviewed titles publishing quality research with speed and efficiency. For further information visit the Wiley Open Access website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信