Applications, benefits, and challenges of adopting teleurology: a scoping review.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Khadijeh Moulaei, Hadi Kazemi-Arpanahi
{"title":"Applications, benefits, and challenges of adopting teleurology: a scoping review.","authors":"Khadijeh Moulaei, Hadi Kazemi-Arpanahi","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05706-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urological diseases present substantial challenges for patients, including restricted access to specialized care, prolonged wait times, and geographical barriers, particularly in underserved and rural regions. Teleurology leverages telecommunication technologies to enable remote consultations, improve patient monitoring, and enhance access to specialized care. This scoping review aims to systematically examine the applications, benefits, and challenges associated with teleurology, offering a comprehensive analysis of its role in contemporary urological practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PRISMA-ScR guidelines was followed to perform this scoping review. Systematic searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, covering publications from 2010 until January 19, 2025. Two trained reviewers independently retrieved, screened, and extracted the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search identified 2,080 studies. After removing 500 duplicates, 1,577 unique studies remained for title and abstract screening. Ultimately, 49 articles were selected for data extraction. The most frequent teleurology communication interventions were Telephone (n = 12) and Videoconferencing (n = 11). Teleurology services were predominantly delivered through synchronous modalities (77%), followed by a combination of synchronous and asynchronous approaches (18%). Tele-consultation (n = 18), Tele-visit (n = 15), and Tele-care, in that order (n = 8) were the most common applications. A total of 339 benefits (n = 216) and challenges (n = 123) for teleurology were identified, with 28 benefits and 13 challenges remaining after consolidation. \"Reducing patient treatment expenditures, travel costs and time\" (n = 30), \"Increasing patient satisfaction with telemedicine services\" (n = 23), \"Access to care for patients in rural or underserved areas\" (n = 17), and \"Curbing disease spread and sustaining care during pandemics while maintaining distancing\" (n = 17) were the most common benefits of teleurology. The most important challenges were \"Lack of physical examination of patients during telemedicine visits\" (n = 30), \"Need for robust digital infrastructure (inaccessible to technology, computer and internet)\" (n = 23), and \"Patient concerns about confidentiality and privacy\" (n = 18).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Teleurology improves access, reduces costs, and enhances patient satisfaction, especially in underserved areas. However, physical exam limitations, infrastructure gaps, and privacy concerns remain challenges. Future efforts should refine teleurology frameworks and strengthen digital infrastructure for secure, high-quality care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"330"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05706-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Urological diseases present substantial challenges for patients, including restricted access to specialized care, prolonged wait times, and geographical barriers, particularly in underserved and rural regions. Teleurology leverages telecommunication technologies to enable remote consultations, improve patient monitoring, and enhance access to specialized care. This scoping review aims to systematically examine the applications, benefits, and challenges associated with teleurology, offering a comprehensive analysis of its role in contemporary urological practice.

Methods: The PRISMA-ScR guidelines was followed to perform this scoping review. Systematic searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, covering publications from 2010 until January 19, 2025. Two trained reviewers independently retrieved, screened, and extracted the data.

Results: The initial search identified 2,080 studies. After removing 500 duplicates, 1,577 unique studies remained for title and abstract screening. Ultimately, 49 articles were selected for data extraction. The most frequent teleurology communication interventions were Telephone (n = 12) and Videoconferencing (n = 11). Teleurology services were predominantly delivered through synchronous modalities (77%), followed by a combination of synchronous and asynchronous approaches (18%). Tele-consultation (n = 18), Tele-visit (n = 15), and Tele-care, in that order (n = 8) were the most common applications. A total of 339 benefits (n = 216) and challenges (n = 123) for teleurology were identified, with 28 benefits and 13 challenges remaining after consolidation. "Reducing patient treatment expenditures, travel costs and time" (n = 30), "Increasing patient satisfaction with telemedicine services" (n = 23), "Access to care for patients in rural or underserved areas" (n = 17), and "Curbing disease spread and sustaining care during pandemics while maintaining distancing" (n = 17) were the most common benefits of teleurology. The most important challenges were "Lack of physical examination of patients during telemedicine visits" (n = 30), "Need for robust digital infrastructure (inaccessible to technology, computer and internet)" (n = 23), and "Patient concerns about confidentiality and privacy" (n = 18).

Conclusions: Teleurology improves access, reduces costs, and enhances patient satisfaction, especially in underserved areas. However, physical exam limitations, infrastructure gaps, and privacy concerns remain challenges. Future efforts should refine teleurology frameworks and strengthen digital infrastructure for secure, high-quality care.

应用、好处和采用终端学的挑战:范围审查。
背景:泌尿系统疾病给患者带来了巨大的挑战,包括获得专业护理的机会受限、等待时间延长和地理障碍,特别是在服务不足和农村地区。远程神经学利用电信技术实现远程会诊,改善患者监测,并增加获得专业护理的机会。本综述旨在系统地研究与远程神经学相关的应用、益处和挑战,并对其在当代泌尿外科实践中的作用进行全面分析。方法:遵循PRISMA-ScR指南进行范围审查。在PubMed, Scopus和Web of Science中进行了系统搜索,涵盖了从2010年到2025年1月19日的出版物。两个训练有素的审稿人独立地检索、筛选和提取数据。结果:最初的搜索确定了2080项研究。在删除500个重复项后,仍有1577个独特的研究用于标题和摘要筛选。最终选取49篇文章进行数据提取。最常见的远程沟通干预是电话(n = 12)和视频会议(n = 11)。远程神经学服务主要通过同步方式提供(77%),其次是同步和异步方式的结合(18%)。远程咨询(n = 18)、远程访问(n = 15)和远程护理(n = 8)是最常见的应用。研究人员共确定了339项对远程神经学的益处(n = 216)和挑战(n = 123),其中28项益处和13项挑战在整合后仍然存在。“减少患者治疗支出、差旅费用和时间” (n = 30)、“提高患者对远程医疗服务的满意度” (n = 23)、“为农村或服务不足地区的患者提供护理” (n = 17)和“在流行病期间遏制疾病传播和维持护理,同时保持距离” (n = 17)是远程神经学最常见的好处。最重要的挑战是“在远程医疗访问期间缺乏对患者的身体检查”(n = 30),“需要强大的数字基础设施(无法使用技术、计算机和互联网)”(n = 23)和“患者对保密和隐私的担忧”(n = 18)。结论:远程神经病学改善了可及性,降低了成本,提高了患者满意度,特别是在服务不足的地区。然而,体检限制、基础设施差距和隐私问题仍然是挑战。未来的努力应完善远程神经学框架,加强数字基础设施,以实现安全、高质量的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信