Interprofessional collaboration and job satisfaction in German intensive care units - a cross-sectional survey within the PRiVENT project.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Respiration Pub Date : 2025-05-26 DOI:10.1159/000546043
Thomas Fleischhauer, Elena Biehler, Julia Dorothea Michels-Zetsche, Franziska C Trudzinski, Janina Schubert-Haack, Johanna Forstner, Armin Schneider, Axel Kempa, Biljana Joves, Claus Neurohr, Felix Jf Herth, Joachim Szecsenyi, Michel Wensing
{"title":"Interprofessional collaboration and job satisfaction in German intensive care units - a cross-sectional survey within the PRiVENT project.","authors":"Thomas Fleischhauer, Elena Biehler, Julia Dorothea Michels-Zetsche, Franziska C Trudzinski, Janina Schubert-Haack, Johanna Forstner, Armin Schneider, Axel Kempa, Biljana Joves, Claus Neurohr, Felix Jf Herth, Joachim Szecsenyi, Michel Wensing","doi":"10.1159/000546043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The multicentre cluster-randomized PRiVENT study aims to improve weaning of long-term ventilated patients in German intensive care units via a complex interprofessional intervention. To assess perceptions on interprofessional collaboration and job satisfaction among different health professions, a survey was conducted in four clusters, each comprising one weaning centre and 7-12 cooperation hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three validated questionnaires were used to measure a) interprofessional socialization (7-level Likert scale), b) interprofessional collaboration (5-level) and c) job satisfaction (7-level). Alongside a descriptive analysis, a subgroup analysis was performed comparing mean scores between physicians and non-physicians and the four clusters. Correlation coefficients were calculated to check for correlations of age group and work experience with interprofessional collaboration and job satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>62 questionnaires were returned by health workers of the intensive care units, corresponding to a response rate of 47%. Respondents rated interprofessional socialization (5.7 ± 0.6 ) and collaboration (3.8 ± 0.6) as good. Job satisfaction was high (5.1 ± 1.0), particularly regarding the collegial environment and variety of work tasks. Satisfaction with physical workload, income, and working hours was lower. Compared to physicians, overall ratings of non-physicians were lower, although the differences were not statistically significant, as were those between clusters. There was a statistically significant positive correlation of age group and work experience with overall job satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health workers within PRiVENT are satisfied with their workplace conditions and rate interprofessional collaboration as good. Follow-up surveys will provide insights into the impact of PRiVENT on interprofessional cooperation and job satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":21048,"journal":{"name":"Respiration","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The multicentre cluster-randomized PRiVENT study aims to improve weaning of long-term ventilated patients in German intensive care units via a complex interprofessional intervention. To assess perceptions on interprofessional collaboration and job satisfaction among different health professions, a survey was conducted in four clusters, each comprising one weaning centre and 7-12 cooperation hospitals.

Methods: Three validated questionnaires were used to measure a) interprofessional socialization (7-level Likert scale), b) interprofessional collaboration (5-level) and c) job satisfaction (7-level). Alongside a descriptive analysis, a subgroup analysis was performed comparing mean scores between physicians and non-physicians and the four clusters. Correlation coefficients were calculated to check for correlations of age group and work experience with interprofessional collaboration and job satisfaction.

Results: 62 questionnaires were returned by health workers of the intensive care units, corresponding to a response rate of 47%. Respondents rated interprofessional socialization (5.7 ± 0.6 ) and collaboration (3.8 ± 0.6) as good. Job satisfaction was high (5.1 ± 1.0), particularly regarding the collegial environment and variety of work tasks. Satisfaction with physical workload, income, and working hours was lower. Compared to physicians, overall ratings of non-physicians were lower, although the differences were not statistically significant, as were those between clusters. There was a statistically significant positive correlation of age group and work experience with overall job satisfaction.

Conclusions: Health workers within PRiVENT are satisfied with their workplace conditions and rate interprofessional collaboration as good. Follow-up surveys will provide insights into the impact of PRiVENT on interprofessional cooperation and job satisfaction.

德国重症监护病房的跨专业合作和工作满意度-在PRiVENT项目中的横断面调查。
背景:多中心集群随机PRiVENT研究旨在通过复杂的跨专业干预改善德国重症监护病房长期通气患者的脱机。为了评估不同卫生专业人员对跨专业合作和工作满意度的看法,在四个组中进行了调查,每个组由一个断奶中心和7-12个合作医院组成。方法:采用3份有效问卷,分别测量a)专业间社会化(7级Likert量表)、b)专业间协作(5级)和c)工作满意度(7级)。除了描述性分析外,还进行了亚组分析,比较了医生和非医生以及四个集群之间的平均得分。计算相关系数以检验年龄、工作经验与跨专业合作及工作满意度的相关性。结果:重症监护病房卫生工作者共回复问卷62份,回复率为47%。受访者认为跨专业社交(5.7±0.6)和协作(3.8±0.6)良好。工作满意度很高(5.1±1.0),特别是在大学环境和工作任务的多样性方面。对体力工作量、收入和工作时间的满意度较低。与医生相比,非医生的总体评分较低,尽管差异在统计学上并不显著,但在集群之间也是如此。年龄、工作经验与整体工作满意度有显著正相关。结论:PRiVENT的卫生工作者对工作环境满意,对跨专业合作评价良好。后续调查将提供对PRiVENT对跨专业合作和工作满意度的影响的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiration
Respiration 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Respiration'' brings together the results of both clinical and experimental investigations on all aspects of the respiratory system in health and disease. Clinical improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of chest and lung diseases are covered, as are the latest findings in physiology, biochemistry, pathology, immunology and pharmacology. The journal includes classic features such as editorials that accompany original articles in clinical and basic science research, reviews and letters to the editor. Further sections are: Technical Notes, The Eye Catcher, What’s Your Diagnosis?, The Opinion Corner, New Drugs in Respiratory Medicine, New Insights from Clinical Practice and Guidelines. ''Respiration'' is the official journal of the Swiss Society for Pneumology (SGP) and also home to the European Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (EABIP), which occupies a dedicated section on Interventional Pulmonology in the journal. This modern mix of different features and a stringent peer-review process by a dedicated editorial board make ''Respiration'' a complete guide to progress in thoracic medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信