Pediatric infections in the first year of life following maternal biologic exposure for autoimmune disorder treatment: A systematic review.

IF 9.1 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Renee Gabrielle Fajardo, Akash Uddandam, Jessie Cunningham, Cristina Longo, Sonia M Grandi
{"title":"Pediatric infections in the first year of life following maternal biologic exposure for autoimmune disorder treatment: A systematic review.","authors":"Renee Gabrielle Fajardo, Akash Uddandam, Jessie Cunningham, Cristina Longo, Sonia M Grandi","doi":"10.1016/j.phrs.2025.107792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pregnancy induces immunologic and physiologic changes that can alter disease activity for women with autoimmune disorders (AD), and if exacerbated, may necessitate treatment. Biologics are increasingly prescribed due to their targeted effects, but transplacental transfer to the fetus may increase potential risks to the infant. This review examines the risk of infection and respiratory distress in the first year of life among infants born to women with AD using biologics during pregnancy versus infants exposed to standard therapies. We systematically searched five databases from January 2012 to June 2023. Inclusion was restricted to cohort and case-control studies including infants born to women with rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, or systemic lupus erythematosus prescribed a biologic or standard therapy during pregnancy. Quality assessment was performed using the ROBINS-I tool for observational studies. Due to between-study heterogeneity in effect estimates and outcomes, studies were not pooled. Of 2975 identified citations, 10 studies were included. In three studies examining the risk of infant infection, findings were inconsistent largely due to lack of precision (OR range: 0.6-1.4, 95% CI range: 0.2-2.8). For respiratory distress, two studies reported an increased risk among infants exposed to biologics (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03,1.74 and RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.06, 2.18) while one did not. Most studies (80%) had a moderate risk of bias. The findings suggest conflicting results for the risk of infant infection and possible associations with respiratory distress. Given the limited number of studies, additional studies are needed to inform treatment decisions for AD during pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19918,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological research","volume":" ","pages":"107792"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacological research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2025.107792","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pregnancy induces immunologic and physiologic changes that can alter disease activity for women with autoimmune disorders (AD), and if exacerbated, may necessitate treatment. Biologics are increasingly prescribed due to their targeted effects, but transplacental transfer to the fetus may increase potential risks to the infant. This review examines the risk of infection and respiratory distress in the first year of life among infants born to women with AD using biologics during pregnancy versus infants exposed to standard therapies. We systematically searched five databases from January 2012 to June 2023. Inclusion was restricted to cohort and case-control studies including infants born to women with rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, or systemic lupus erythematosus prescribed a biologic or standard therapy during pregnancy. Quality assessment was performed using the ROBINS-I tool for observational studies. Due to between-study heterogeneity in effect estimates and outcomes, studies were not pooled. Of 2975 identified citations, 10 studies were included. In three studies examining the risk of infant infection, findings were inconsistent largely due to lack of precision (OR range: 0.6-1.4, 95% CI range: 0.2-2.8). For respiratory distress, two studies reported an increased risk among infants exposed to biologics (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03,1.74 and RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.06, 2.18) while one did not. Most studies (80%) had a moderate risk of bias. The findings suggest conflicting results for the risk of infant infection and possible associations with respiratory distress. Given the limited number of studies, additional studies are needed to inform treatment decisions for AD during pregnancy.

母亲生物暴露治疗自身免疫性疾病后第一年儿童感染:系统回顾
妊娠引起免疫和生理变化,可改变自身免疫性疾病(AD)妇女的疾病活动性,如果加重,可能需要治疗。由于其靶向作用,生物制剂的处方越来越多,但经胎盘移植给胎儿可能会增加对婴儿的潜在风险。本综述探讨了妊娠期使用生物制剂与接受标准治疗的阿尔茨海默病妇女所生婴儿第一年感染和呼吸窘迫的风险。我们系统地检索了2012年1月至2023年6月的5个数据库。纳入的研究仅限于队列和病例对照研究,包括类风湿关节炎、多发性硬化症或系统性红斑狼疮妇女所生的婴儿,这些妇女在怀孕期间接受了生物或标准治疗。使用ROBINS-I工具对观察性研究进行质量评估。由于效应估计和结果的研究间异质性,研究没有汇总。在2975条已确定的引文中,纳入了10项研究。在三项检查婴儿感染风险的研究中,由于缺乏准确性,结果不一致(OR范围:0.6-1.4,95% CI范围:0.2-2.8)。对于呼吸窘迫,两项研究报告了暴露于生物制剂的婴儿的风险增加(HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03,1.74, RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.06, 2.18),而一项研究没有报告。大多数研究(80%)有中等偏倚风险。研究结果表明,婴儿感染风险和可能与呼吸窘迫有关的结果相互矛盾。鉴于研究数量有限,需要更多的研究来为怀孕期间AD的治疗决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacological research
Pharmacological research 医学-药学
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
491
审稿时长
8 days
期刊介绍: Pharmacological Research publishes cutting-edge articles in biomedical sciences to cover a broad range of topics that move the pharmacological field forward. Pharmacological research publishes articles on molecular, biochemical, translational, and clinical research (including clinical trials); it is proud of its rapid publication of accepted papers that comprises a dedicated, fast acceptance and publication track for high profile articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信