Biomechanical evaluation of temporomandibular joint implants and periprosthetic bone under unilateral and bilateral clenching.

Abstract

To ensure the long-term success of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) implants, it is imperative to understand their biomechanical performances. This study aims to compare the biomechanical performance of two stock implants (narrow and standard) under unilateral and bilateral clenching during both osseointegrated and non-osseointegrated conditions. Finite element models of a human mandible were developed from QCT data, with the left TMJ being replaced by the implants. Six clenching tasks were simulated to evaluate stress and strain distributions in the mandible and implants. Ipsilateral clenching produced higher mandibular strains, while contralateral clenching generated larger implant stresses. Furthermore, intercuspal biting was found to have produced the highest strain (1750-1880 µε) and stress (∼17 MPa) in the mandible. Osseointegration reduced stresses (up to 0.14 MPa) and strains (up to 30 µε) in mandible as well as stresses in mandibular components (up to 48 MPa) and screws (up to 71 MPa). However, during non-osseointegrated conditions, stresses in cortical bone were higher for standard TMJ implant as compared to narrow implant. This suggests possible preference of narrow implant over standard ones.