Challenges in the dose calculation from urine measurements in routine internal monitoring of 131I and other radionuclides.

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 BIOLOGY
Oliver Meisenberg, Ayesha Mohsin
{"title":"Challenges in the dose calculation from urine measurements in routine internal monitoring of <sup>131</sup>I and other radionuclides.","authors":"Oliver Meisenberg, Ayesha Mohsin","doi":"10.1007/s00411-025-01129-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The measurement of 24-hour urine samples is one of the methods of routine monitoring of intakes of radionuclides. It is briefly mentioned in relevant documents by the International Commission on Radiological Protection that for <sup>131</sup>I the strong decrease of the excretion within the first days after an intake makes the dose calculation from urine measurements unreliable when the time pattern of the intake is unknown. This can result in a major overestimation of the committed effective dose. For quantifying the influence of the time pattern of an intake on the dose, the results of the dose calculation for an acute intake at the midpoint of a monitoring interval (standard assumption) were compared with those for a chronic intake with varying daily activity. For <sup>131</sup>I, aerosols type F, the standard assumption of an acute intake can lead to an overestimation of the calculated dose by a factor of 140 on average as compared to a chronic intake. Among other investigated radionuclides, the strongest overestimation was found for <sup>14</sup>C, gas/vapour type F, when measured every 180 days (factor of 330), although this method complies with current criteria from the international standard ISO 20553. It is recommended that ISO 20553 is supplemented with a criterion that describes the reliability of a monitoring method under different time patterns of an intake additional to the existing criteria. This criterion should set an upper limit for the ratio of the dose calculations under the described assumptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21002,"journal":{"name":"Radiation and Environmental Biophysics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation and Environmental Biophysics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-025-01129-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The measurement of 24-hour urine samples is one of the methods of routine monitoring of intakes of radionuclides. It is briefly mentioned in relevant documents by the International Commission on Radiological Protection that for 131I the strong decrease of the excretion within the first days after an intake makes the dose calculation from urine measurements unreliable when the time pattern of the intake is unknown. This can result in a major overestimation of the committed effective dose. For quantifying the influence of the time pattern of an intake on the dose, the results of the dose calculation for an acute intake at the midpoint of a monitoring interval (standard assumption) were compared with those for a chronic intake with varying daily activity. For 131I, aerosols type F, the standard assumption of an acute intake can lead to an overestimation of the calculated dose by a factor of 140 on average as compared to a chronic intake. Among other investigated radionuclides, the strongest overestimation was found for 14C, gas/vapour type F, when measured every 180 days (factor of 330), although this method complies with current criteria from the international standard ISO 20553. It is recommended that ISO 20553 is supplemented with a criterion that describes the reliability of a monitoring method under different time patterns of an intake additional to the existing criteria. This criterion should set an upper limit for the ratio of the dose calculations under the described assumptions.

尿量计算在131I和其他放射性核素常规内部监测中的挑战。
24小时尿样测定是常规监测放射性核素摄入的方法之一。国际放射防护委员会在有关文件中简要地提到,在摄入后的头几天内,由于排泄物的大量减少,在摄入时间模式未知的情况下,通过尿液测量来计算剂量是不可靠的。这可能导致对承诺有效剂量的严重高估。为了量化摄入时间模式对剂量的影响,将监测间隔中点(标准假设)的急性摄入剂量计算结果与不同日常活动的慢性摄入剂量计算结果进行了比较。对于131I, F型气溶胶,急性摄入的标准假设可能导致计算剂量的平均高估,与慢性摄入相比,高估了140倍。在所调查的其他放射性核素中,每180天测量一次(330倍),发现对F型气体/蒸气型14C的高估程度最高,尽管这种方法符合国际标准ISO 20553的现行标准。建议对ISO 20553进行补充,在现有标准的基础上增加一个标准,描述在不同时间模式下监测方法的可靠性。该准则应为上述假设下的剂量计算比率设定上限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal is devoted to fundamental and applied issues in radiation research and biophysics. The topics may include: Biophysics of ionizing radiation: radiation physics and chemistry, radiation dosimetry, radiobiology, radioecology, biophysical foundations of medical applications of radiation, and radiation protection. Biological effects of radiation: experimental or theoretical work on molecular or cellular effects; relevance of biological effects for risk assessment; biological effects of medical applications of radiation; relevance of radiation for biosphere and in space; modelling of ecosystems; modelling of transport processes of substances in biotic systems. Risk assessment: epidemiological studies of cancer and non-cancer effects; quantification of risk including exposures to radiation and confounding factors Contributions to these topics may include theoretical-mathematical and experimental material, as well as description of new techniques relevant for the study of these issues. They can range from complex radiobiological phenomena to issues in health physics and environmental protection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信