Montse Pauta, Raigam J Martinez-Portilla, Ana Cecilia Jara-Ettinger, Victoria Ardiles-Ruesjas, Antoni Borrell
{"title":"Genome-Wide Cell-Free DNA Analysis for Aneuploidy Detection in Miscarriages: Test Performance Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Montse Pauta, Raigam J Martinez-Portilla, Ana Cecilia Jara-Ettinger, Victoria Ardiles-Ruesjas, Antoni Borrell","doi":"10.1002/pd.6824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published series examining the efficacy of genome-wide cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing in identifying aneuploidy in pregnancies ending in miscarriage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted encompassing observational studies evaluating aneuploidy detection by genome-wide cfDNA testing in pregnancy losses before 22 weeks of gestation. A hierarchical summary receiver operating curve was employed to assess pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of genome-wide cfDNA versus genetic diagnostic studies in the detection of aneuploidy. Pooled aneuploidy rate, rate of no-calls, and concordance between cfDNA and diagnostic studies were analyzed using a single proportion meta-analysis based on the inverse of the variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 25 eligible series, eight studies were included for analysis, comprising 552 miscarriages with informative results for both cfDNA and diagnostic testing. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 78% (95% CI: 71%-83%), 91% (95% CI: 86%-95%), and 92%, respectively. Pooled aneuploidy rate, the proportion of no-calls, and concordance were 61% (95% CI: 53%-69%), 4% (95% CI: 0%-12%), and 84% (95% CI: 81%-87%), respectively. In cases of positive cfDNA results, the risk of aneuploidy increased to 93%, whereas negative results yielded a 28% risk of aneuploidy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>cfDNA testing demonstrates acceptable accuracy in predicting fetal aneuploidy when employed as a screening test in miscarriages. The main advantage of cfDNA testing is that it does not require the availability of products of conception or prior chorionic villi sampling.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6824","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published series examining the efficacy of genome-wide cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing in identifying aneuploidy in pregnancies ending in miscarriage.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted encompassing observational studies evaluating aneuploidy detection by genome-wide cfDNA testing in pregnancy losses before 22 weeks of gestation. A hierarchical summary receiver operating curve was employed to assess pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of genome-wide cfDNA versus genetic diagnostic studies in the detection of aneuploidy. Pooled aneuploidy rate, rate of no-calls, and concordance between cfDNA and diagnostic studies were analyzed using a single proportion meta-analysis based on the inverse of the variance.
Results: Out of 25 eligible series, eight studies were included for analysis, comprising 552 miscarriages with informative results for both cfDNA and diagnostic testing. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 78% (95% CI: 71%-83%), 91% (95% CI: 86%-95%), and 92%, respectively. Pooled aneuploidy rate, the proportion of no-calls, and concordance were 61% (95% CI: 53%-69%), 4% (95% CI: 0%-12%), and 84% (95% CI: 81%-87%), respectively. In cases of positive cfDNA results, the risk of aneuploidy increased to 93%, whereas negative results yielded a 28% risk of aneuploidy.
Conclusion: cfDNA testing demonstrates acceptable accuracy in predicting fetal aneuploidy when employed as a screening test in miscarriages. The main advantage of cfDNA testing is that it does not require the availability of products of conception or prior chorionic villi sampling.
期刊介绍:
Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling