Validation of the Arabic Version of Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-29 (MSCOL-29-Ar): Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
NeuroRehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-27 DOI:10.1177/10538135251344929
Afaf Am Shaheen As, Jude A Alsharafi, Mishel M Aldaihan, Asma S Alrushud, Asma A Aldera, Mai A Alder, Saad Alhammad, Ahmed Farrag, Walaa Elsayed, Muneera Almurdi, Maha Algabbani
{"title":"Validation of the Arabic Version of Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-29 (MSCOL-29-Ar): Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Analysis.","authors":"Afaf Am Shaheen As, Jude A Alsharafi, Mishel M Aldaihan, Asma S Alrushud, Asma A Aldera, Mai A Alder, Saad Alhammad, Ahmed Farrag, Walaa Elsayed, Muneera Almurdi, Maha Algabbani","doi":"10.1177/10538135251344929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background and objectivesTo translate and adapt the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-29 into Arabic <b>(</b>MSQOL-29-Ar) and assess its psychometric properties in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).MethodsGenerally, 101 Arabic-speaking adults with MS aged 21 to 60 were recruited. Construct validity was tested by correlating MSQOL-29-Ar with the Arabic Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS-AR) and Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life (MusiQOL). Known-group validity was assessed by correlating the scale's Physical Health Composite (PHC) and Mental Health Composite (MHC) scores with the demographic and clinical data. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC<sub>95</sub>), limit of agreement (LOA), responsiveness, and floor/ceiling effects were also investigated.ResultsPHC and MHC scores correlated strongly with FAMS-ARA (r = 0.76 and 0.70, respectively).PHC scores were associated with age, employment, and MS chronicity, while MHC scores correlated with the Expanded Disability Status Scale. Internal consistency was acceptable (PHC α = 0.80; MHC α = 0.90), with excellent test-retest reliability (PHC r = 0.76; MHC r = 0.90). SEM (1.4-1.6) and MDC<sub>95</sub> (4.3-3) were low. Responsiveness analysis indicated moderate accuracy (AUC = 0.70-0.75) with on-floor/ceiling effects.ConclusionMSQOL-29-Ar is valid and reliable for assessing HQOL in people with MS, making it suitable for clinical and rehabilitation settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"224-238"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135251344929","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectivesTo translate and adapt the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-29 into Arabic (MSQOL-29-Ar) and assess its psychometric properties in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).MethodsGenerally, 101 Arabic-speaking adults with MS aged 21 to 60 were recruited. Construct validity was tested by correlating MSQOL-29-Ar with the Arabic Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS-AR) and Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life (MusiQOL). Known-group validity was assessed by correlating the scale's Physical Health Composite (PHC) and Mental Health Composite (MHC) scores with the demographic and clinical data. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC95), limit of agreement (LOA), responsiveness, and floor/ceiling effects were also investigated.ResultsPHC and MHC scores correlated strongly with FAMS-ARA (r = 0.76 and 0.70, respectively).PHC scores were associated with age, employment, and MS chronicity, while MHC scores correlated with the Expanded Disability Status Scale. Internal consistency was acceptable (PHC α = 0.80; MHC α = 0.90), with excellent test-retest reliability (PHC r = 0.76; MHC r = 0.90). SEM (1.4-1.6) and MDC95 (4.3-3) were low. Responsiveness analysis indicated moderate accuracy (AUC = 0.70-0.75) with on-floor/ceiling effects.ConclusionMSQOL-29-Ar is valid and reliable for assessing HQOL in people with MS, making it suitable for clinical and rehabilitation settings.

阿拉伯版多发性硬化症生活质量量表29 (MSCOL-29-Ar)的验证:跨文化适应和心理测量分析。
背景与目的将多发性硬化症生活质量量表(MSQOL-29-Ar)翻译成阿拉伯文,并评估其在多发性硬化症(MS)患者中的心理测量特性。方法一般招募101例21 ~ 60岁阿拉伯语多发性硬化症患者。通过将MSQOL-29-Ar与阿拉伯语多发性硬化症功能评估(FAMS-AR)和多发性硬化症国际生活质量(musiol)相关联来检验结构效度。已知组效度是通过将量表的生理健康综合(PHC)和心理健康综合(MHC)得分与人口学和临床数据相关联来评估的。测试-重测信度、内部一致性、测量标准误差(SEM)、最小可检测变化(MDC95)、一致性限(LOA)、响应性和下限/上限效应也进行了调查。结果sphc和MHC评分与FAMS-ARA相关性较强(r分别为0.76和0.70)。PHC评分与年龄、就业和MS慢性程度相关,而MHC评分与扩展残疾状态量表相关。内部一致性可接受(PHC α = 0.80;MHC α = 0.90),重测信度极好(PHC r = 0.76;MHC r = 0.90)。SEM(1.4-1.6)和MDC95(4.3-3)较低。响应性分析显示准确度中等(AUC = 0.70-0.75),具有地板/天花板效应。结论msqol -29- ar评价MS患者HQOL有效、可靠,适用于临床和康复治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信