Prognostic significance of modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients undergoing FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab therapy for advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer.
Koji Numata, Yukari Ono, Kenta Iguchi, Mamoru Uchiyama, Masahiro Asari, Keisuke Kazama, Norio Yukawa, Aya Saito, Manabu Shiozawa
{"title":"Prognostic significance of modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients undergoing FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab therapy for advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer.","authors":"Koji Numata, Yukari Ono, Kenta Iguchi, Mamoru Uchiyama, Masahiro Asari, Keisuke Kazama, Norio Yukawa, Aya Saito, Manabu Shiozawa","doi":"10.1159/000546260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The prognostic value of the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), a systemic inflammatory response marker, has been reported in various cancers. However, its role in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) undergoing first-line FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab (BV) therapy remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of pretreatment mGPS and other inflammatory markers in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively reviewed 133 patients with mCRC treated with first-line FOLFOXIRI + BV. We assessed the prognostic value of pretreatment mGPS and other inflammatory markers (NLR, PLR, LMR) in relation to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher mGPS (score 2) was significantly associated with poor PFS and OS. Multivariate analysis identified mGPS 2 as an independent predictor of worse PFS (hazard ratio 2.76, p = 0.004) and OS (hazard ratio 3.43, p < 0.001). No significant associations were found between other inflammatory markers and survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pretreatment mGPS is a simple and useful prognostic factor for mCRC patients receiving FOLFOXIRI + BV therapy and may serve as a convenient indicator for accurate prognosis prediction and treatment decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546260","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The prognostic value of the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), a systemic inflammatory response marker, has been reported in various cancers. However, its role in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) undergoing first-line FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab (BV) therapy remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of pretreatment mGPS and other inflammatory markers in this patient population.
Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed 133 patients with mCRC treated with first-line FOLFOXIRI + BV. We assessed the prognostic value of pretreatment mGPS and other inflammatory markers (NLR, PLR, LMR) in relation to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results: Higher mGPS (score 2) was significantly associated with poor PFS and OS. Multivariate analysis identified mGPS 2 as an independent predictor of worse PFS (hazard ratio 2.76, p = 0.004) and OS (hazard ratio 3.43, p < 0.001). No significant associations were found between other inflammatory markers and survival outcomes.
Conclusions: Pretreatment mGPS is a simple and useful prognostic factor for mCRC patients receiving FOLFOXIRI + BV therapy and may serve as a convenient indicator for accurate prognosis prediction and treatment decision-making.
期刊介绍:
Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.