Effectiveness and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies for macular edema in retinal vein occlusion: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies for macular edema in retinal vein occlusion: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Kai-Yang Chen, Hoi-Chun Chan, Chi-Ming Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We evaluated the efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies for macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO), a leading cause of vision loss. A comprehensive search of 6 databases identified 17 RCTs involving 4272 eyes. Eligible studies reported outcomes such as visual acuity, ETDRS letter scores, central retinal thickness (CRT), and adverse events, with follow-up of at least 6 months. Anti-VEGF therapy showed significant efficacy, with a pooled mean difference (MD) of 15.14 ETDRS letters (95 % CI: 14.24-16.03, p < 0.001). Over 12 months, patients were 2.87 times more likely to achieve gains of > 15 ETDRS letters (OR 2.87, 95 % CI: 2.21-3.72). CRT decreased by MD of -350 µm (95 % CI: -0.363 to -0.338, p < 0.001). Safety analysis revealed reduced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (OR 0.88, p = 0.035) with no significant systemic risks. Intraocular pressure elevation (OR 1.924, p < 0.001) warrants monitoring. Subgroup analysis highlighted faricimab as most effective, with aflibercept, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab providing substantial benefits. Anti-VEGF therapy is an effective, safe cornerstone for managing ME in RVO. Further research should explore biomarkers and combination treatments to refine therapeutic approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.05.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We evaluated the efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies for macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO), a leading cause of vision loss. A comprehensive search of 6 databases identified 17 RCTs involving 4272 eyes. Eligible studies reported outcomes such as visual acuity, ETDRS letter scores, central retinal thickness (CRT), and adverse events, with follow-up of at least 6 months. Anti-VEGF therapy showed significant efficacy, with a pooled mean difference (MD) of 15.14 ETDRS letters (95 % CI: 14.24-16.03, p < 0.001). Over 12 months, patients were 2.87 times more likely to achieve gains of > 15 ETDRS letters (OR 2.87, 95 % CI: 2.21-3.72). CRT decreased by MD of -350 µm (95 % CI: -0.363 to -0.338, p < 0.001). Safety analysis revealed reduced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (OR 0.88, p = 0.035) with no significant systemic risks. Intraocular pressure elevation (OR 1.924, p < 0.001) warrants monitoring. Subgroup analysis highlighted faricimab as most effective, with aflibercept, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab providing substantial benefits. Anti-VEGF therapy is an effective, safe cornerstone for managing ME in RVO. Further research should explore biomarkers and combination treatments to refine therapeutic approaches.
期刊介绍:
Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.