The impact of educational attainment on gestational diabetes mellitus is mediated by body mass index: A Mendelian randomization study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shengjiao Zhu, Ruifeng Gui, Jiao Mu, Kun Tong, Guoqiang Chen
{"title":"The impact of educational attainment on gestational diabetes mellitus is mediated by body mass index: A Mendelian randomization study.","authors":"Shengjiao Zhu, Ruifeng Gui, Jiao Mu, Kun Tong, Guoqiang Chen","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000042008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common pregnancy complication associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. While numerous studies have investigated the factors influencing GDM, the relationship between educational attainment and the GDM risk remains less explored. This study employs a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to estimate the causal relationship between educational attainment, as a proxy for socioeconomic inequality, and the risk of GDM, and to quantify the roles of body mass index (BMI) as a potential mediator. We performed a two-sample MR study of genetically predicted educational attainment (instrumented using 1271 variants from 766,345 individuals) and gestational diabetes mellitus (116,363 individuals) using the largest genome-wide association studies. We used a two-step MR to quantify the proportion of education's effect on GDM mediated by BMI (681,275 individuals). Each standard deviation increase in educational attainment (4.2 years of schooling) was protective of GDM (odds ratios: 0.67; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.59, 0.76). Higher educational attainment was also protective for BMI [β = -0.27 standard deviation (~1.3 kg/m2); 95% CI: -0.32, -0.22]. BMI mediated 35% (95% CI: 25%, 46%) of the total effect of education on GDM. Higher educational attainment has a protective effect on GDM risk. Interventions to reduce excess adiposity at the population level may reduce this risk, but the effect of education on GDM remains largely unexplained. Further investigation is necessary to identify additional risk factors that function as potentially modifiable mediators.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"104 21","pages":"e42008"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12113916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000042008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common pregnancy complication associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. While numerous studies have investigated the factors influencing GDM, the relationship between educational attainment and the GDM risk remains less explored. This study employs a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to estimate the causal relationship between educational attainment, as a proxy for socioeconomic inequality, and the risk of GDM, and to quantify the roles of body mass index (BMI) as a potential mediator. We performed a two-sample MR study of genetically predicted educational attainment (instrumented using 1271 variants from 766,345 individuals) and gestational diabetes mellitus (116,363 individuals) using the largest genome-wide association studies. We used a two-step MR to quantify the proportion of education's effect on GDM mediated by BMI (681,275 individuals). Each standard deviation increase in educational attainment (4.2 years of schooling) was protective of GDM (odds ratios: 0.67; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.59, 0.76). Higher educational attainment was also protective for BMI [β = -0.27 standard deviation (~1.3 kg/m2); 95% CI: -0.32, -0.22]. BMI mediated 35% (95% CI: 25%, 46%) of the total effect of education on GDM. Higher educational attainment has a protective effect on GDM risk. Interventions to reduce excess adiposity at the population level may reduce this risk, but the effect of education on GDM remains largely unexplained. Further investigation is necessary to identify additional risk factors that function as potentially modifiable mediators.

受教育程度对妊娠期糖尿病的影响是由体重指数介导的:一项孟德尔随机研究。
妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)是一种常见的妊娠并发症,与孕产妇和新生儿的不良结局相关。虽然有许多研究调查了影响GDM的因素,但教育程度与GDM风险之间的关系仍然很少被探索。本研究采用孟德尔随机化(MR)方法来估计教育程度(作为社会经济不平等的代理)与GDM风险之间的因果关系,并量化体重指数(BMI)作为潜在中介的作用。我们使用最大的全基因组关联研究,对遗传预测的受教育程度(使用来自766,345个体的1271个变体)和妊娠糖尿病(116,363个体)进行了两样本MR研究。我们使用两步MR来量化由BMI介导的教育对GDM的影响比例(681,275人)。受教育程度每增加一个标准差(4.2年受教育)对GDM具有保护作用(优势比:0.67;95%置信区间[CI]: 0.59, 0.76)。较高的受教育程度对BMI也有保护作用[β = -0.27标准差(~1.3 kg/m2);95% ci: -0.32, -0.22]。BMI介导了教育对GDM总影响的35% (95% CI: 25%, 46%)。较高的受教育程度对GDM风险有保护作用。在人口水平上减少过度肥胖的干预措施可能会降低这种风险,但教育对GDM的影响在很大程度上仍未得到解释。需要进一步调查以确定作为潜在可改变介质的其他风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信