{"title":"Three in a Bed: Can Partner Support Improve CPAP Adherence? A Systematic Review and Intervention Recommendations.","authors":"Giada Rapelli, Carola Caloni, Francesca Cattaneo, Marco Redaelli, Roberto Cattivelli, Giulia Landi, Eliana Tossani, Silvana Grandi, Gianluca Castelnuovo, Giada Pietrabissa","doi":"10.3390/jpm15050192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the standard approach for treating obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), but patient adherence is often low due to various influencing factors. Recently, researchers have increasingly begun to explore the influence of partner support on adherence to CPAP therapy. This systematic review seeks to consolidate current evidence regarding the impact of partner support on CPAP adherence in individuals with OSAS. <b>Methods</b>: A comprehensive literature search was carried out across PubMed, Scopus, Medline, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases under PRISMA guidelines. Stringent inclusion criteria were used, and at least two independent reviewers screened all studies. The mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) was used to assess selected articles for quality. Data relevant to the review's objectives were extracted and presented through narrative synthesis. The review protocol was preregistered (Prospero CRD420251016574). <b>Results</b>: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings highlighted the significant influence of adherence to CPAP. Partner support, relationship quality, and collaborative efforts emerged as facilitators of adherence, with partnered individuals exhibiting higher adherence to CPAP use. However, barriers such as anxiety, interruption in intimacy, and conflict in relationships were also identified. <b>Conclusions</b>: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to synthesize evidence on the partner's role in CPAP adherence and inform clinicians on the importance of providing personalized care based on biopsychosocial characteristics of patients; for example, assessing the partner support in the management of the illness. Furthermore, the findings emphasize the need for further research-particularly randomized controlled trials and dyadic designs-to deepen understanding of how partner dynamics influence effects of CPAP treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12113088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15050192","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the standard approach for treating obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), but patient adherence is often low due to various influencing factors. Recently, researchers have increasingly begun to explore the influence of partner support on adherence to CPAP therapy. This systematic review seeks to consolidate current evidence regarding the impact of partner support on CPAP adherence in individuals with OSAS. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was carried out across PubMed, Scopus, Medline, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases under PRISMA guidelines. Stringent inclusion criteria were used, and at least two independent reviewers screened all studies. The mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) was used to assess selected articles for quality. Data relevant to the review's objectives were extracted and presented through narrative synthesis. The review protocol was preregistered (Prospero CRD420251016574). Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings highlighted the significant influence of adherence to CPAP. Partner support, relationship quality, and collaborative efforts emerged as facilitators of adherence, with partnered individuals exhibiting higher adherence to CPAP use. However, barriers such as anxiety, interruption in intimacy, and conflict in relationships were also identified. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to synthesize evidence on the partner's role in CPAP adherence and inform clinicians on the importance of providing personalized care based on biopsychosocial characteristics of patients; for example, assessing the partner support in the management of the illness. Furthermore, the findings emphasize the need for further research-particularly randomized controlled trials and dyadic designs-to deepen understanding of how partner dynamics influence effects of CPAP treatment.
背景/目的:持续气道正压通气(CPAP)是治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)的标准方法,但由于各种影响因素,患者的依从性往往较低。最近,研究人员越来越多地开始探索伴侣支持对CPAP治疗依从性的影响。本系统综述旨在巩固关于伴侣支持对OSAS患者CPAP依从性影响的现有证据。方法:根据PRISMA指南对PubMed、Scopus、Medline、PsycINFO和Web of Science数据库进行综合文献检索。采用了严格的纳入标准,至少有两名独立审稿人筛选了所有研究。采用混合方法评价工具(MMAT)评价所选文章的质量。与审查目标有关的数据被提取出来,并通过叙述综合提出。审查方案已预注册(Prospero CRD420251016574)。结果:9项研究符合纳入标准。研究结果强调了坚持CPAP的显著影响。伴侣支持、关系质量和合作努力成为依从性的促进因素,有伴侣的个体表现出更高的CPAP使用依从性。然而,焦虑、亲密关系中断和关系冲突等障碍也被确定。结论:据我们所知,这是第一个系统综述,综合了伴侣在CPAP依从性中的作用,并告知临床医生基于患者的生物心理社会特征提供个性化护理的重要性;例如,评估伴侣对疾病管理的支持。此外,研究结果强调需要进一步的研究,特别是随机对照试验和二元设计,以加深对伴侣动态如何影响CPAP治疗效果的理解。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.