Central Nervous System Metastases from Primary Lung Carcinoma: Significance of RNA Fusion Testing and Early Versus Late Metastases.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Michelle Garlin Politis, Mahesh Mansukhani, Benjamin O Herzberg, Lanyi N Chen, Mark Stoopler, Maelle Saliba, Markus Siegelin, Zhe Zhu, Joshua Sonett, Brian S Henick, Simon K Cheng, Swarnali Acharyya, Catherine A Shu, Michael L Miller, Benjamin Izar, Helen Fernandes, Susan Hsiao, Anjali Saqi
{"title":"Central Nervous System Metastases from Primary Lung Carcinoma: Significance of RNA Fusion Testing and Early Versus Late Metastases.","authors":"Michelle Garlin Politis, Mahesh Mansukhani, Benjamin O Herzberg, Lanyi N Chen, Mark Stoopler, Maelle Saliba, Markus Siegelin, Zhe Zhu, Joshua Sonett, Brian S Henick, Simon K Cheng, Swarnali Acharyya, Catherine A Shu, Michael L Miller, Benjamin Izar, Helen Fernandes, Susan Hsiao, Anjali Saqi","doi":"10.3390/jpm15050181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> While the genomic landscape of primary lung carcinomas is well characterized, there is a relative scarcity of fusion data on corresponding central nervous system (CNS) metastases. This study aimed to elucidate the molecular profiles of CNS metastases to (1) assess the significance of a combined DNA-reflex RNA fusion testing approach and (2) compare the mutational landscape between patients who present initially [early (≤2 months)] with CNS metastases and those who develop CNS metastases thereafter [late (>2 months)]. <b>Methods</b>: We performed a retrospective search of CNS metastases of adenocarcinoma of probable lung origin interrogated by targeted DNA-reflex RNA next-generation sequencing (NGS). The DNA NGS panel included the driver mutations <i>EGFR</i>, <i>BRAF</i>, <i>KRAS</i>, <i>MET</i>, and <i>ERBB2</i>. RNA NGS included <i>ALK</i>, <i>RET</i>, <i>ROS1</i>, and <i>MET</i>. Additionally, mutational profiles were examined between those with early versus late CNS metastases. <b>Results:</b> Of the 58 patients, 44 (75.9%) had mutations or alterations, including 34 identified by DNA NGS [<i>EGFR</i> (<i>n</i> = 17; 50.0%), <i>KRAS</i> (<i>n</i> = 15; 44.1%), <i>MET</i> (<i>n</i> = 2; 5.9%)] and 10/24 by RNA NGS [<i>ALK</i> (<i>n</i> = 7; 70%), <i>MET</i> (<i>n</i> = 2; 20%), <i>ROS1</i> (<i>n</i> = 1; 10%)]. Of all patients, 32 (55%) presented with early and 26 (45%) with late CNS metastases. Although patients with early metastases had worse survival compared to those with late metastases (<i>p</i> < 0.001), there were no statistically significant differences in the mutational profiles between the two cohorts. <b>Conclusions</b>: A significant proportion of CNS metastases without driver mutations identified by DNA NGS had targetable alterations identified by RNA NGS (10/24, 41.7%). In summary, a combined DNA with reflex RNA fusion testing approach plays a significant role in detecting and potentially managing CNS metastases. Comprehensive prospective studies are essential to elucidate the differences between early and late CNS metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12112828/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15050181","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: While the genomic landscape of primary lung carcinomas is well characterized, there is a relative scarcity of fusion data on corresponding central nervous system (CNS) metastases. This study aimed to elucidate the molecular profiles of CNS metastases to (1) assess the significance of a combined DNA-reflex RNA fusion testing approach and (2) compare the mutational landscape between patients who present initially [early (≤2 months)] with CNS metastases and those who develop CNS metastases thereafter [late (>2 months)]. Methods: We performed a retrospective search of CNS metastases of adenocarcinoma of probable lung origin interrogated by targeted DNA-reflex RNA next-generation sequencing (NGS). The DNA NGS panel included the driver mutations EGFR, BRAF, KRAS, MET, and ERBB2. RNA NGS included ALK, RET, ROS1, and MET. Additionally, mutational profiles were examined between those with early versus late CNS metastases. Results: Of the 58 patients, 44 (75.9%) had mutations or alterations, including 34 identified by DNA NGS [EGFR (n = 17; 50.0%), KRAS (n = 15; 44.1%), MET (n = 2; 5.9%)] and 10/24 by RNA NGS [ALK (n = 7; 70%), MET (n = 2; 20%), ROS1 (n = 1; 10%)]. Of all patients, 32 (55%) presented with early and 26 (45%) with late CNS metastases. Although patients with early metastases had worse survival compared to those with late metastases (p < 0.001), there were no statistically significant differences in the mutational profiles between the two cohorts. Conclusions: A significant proportion of CNS metastases without driver mutations identified by DNA NGS had targetable alterations identified by RNA NGS (10/24, 41.7%). In summary, a combined DNA with reflex RNA fusion testing approach plays a significant role in detecting and potentially managing CNS metastases. Comprehensive prospective studies are essential to elucidate the differences between early and late CNS metastases.

原发性肺癌中枢神经系统转移:RNA融合检测和早期与晚期转移的意义。
背景/目的:虽然原发性肺癌的基因组图谱已经很好地表征了,但相应的中枢神经系统(CNS)转移的融合数据相对缺乏。本研究旨在阐明中枢神经系统转移的分子特征,以:(1)评估dna -反射RNA融合联合检测方法的意义;(2)比较最初[早期(≤2个月)]出现中枢神经系统转移的患者与随后[晚期(≤2个月)]出现中枢神经系统转移的患者之间的突变格局。方法:我们通过靶向dna反射RNA新一代测序(NGS)对可能起源于肺的腺癌的中枢神经系统转移进行回顾性研究。DNA NGS面板包括驱动突变EGFR、BRAF、KRAS、MET和ERBB2。RNA NGS包括ALK、RET、ROS1和MET。此外,还研究了早期和晚期中枢神经系统转移患者之间的突变谱。结果:58例患者中,44例(75.9%)有突变或改变,其中34例通过DNA NGS [EGFR]鉴定(n = 17;50.0%), KRAS (n = 15;44.1%), MET (n = 2;5.9%)]和10/24 RNA NGS [ALK] (n = 7;70%), MET (n = 2;20%), ROS1 (n = 1;10%)]。在所有患者中,32例(55%)出现早期中枢神经系统转移,26例(45%)出现晚期中枢神经系统转移。尽管与晚期转移患者相比,早期转移患者的生存率更差(p < 0.001),但两个队列之间的突变谱没有统计学差异。结论:DNA NGS鉴定的无驱动突变的CNS转移瘤中,有相当大比例存在RNA NGS鉴定的可靶向改变(10/24,41.7%)。总之,结合DNA和反射性RNA融合检测方法在检测和潜在管理中枢神经系统转移中起着重要作用。全面的前瞻性研究对于阐明早期和晚期中枢神经系统转移的差异至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信