Gloria M Zaragoza-Fernández, José C De La Flor, Verónica Fernández Abreu, Elisa Iglesias Castellano, Laura Rodríguez-Barbero Requena, Rafael Fernández Castillo
{"title":"Comparison of Depression in Hemodialysis, Peritoneal Dialysis, and Kidney Transplant Patients: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Gloria M Zaragoza-Fernández, José C De La Flor, Verónica Fernández Abreu, Elisa Iglesias Castellano, Laura Rodríguez-Barbero Requena, Rafael Fernández Castillo","doi":"10.3390/jpm15050179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Depression is a common comorbidity in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing renal replacement therapy. This meta-analysis compares depression prevalence across hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation, considering mean age, treatment duration, comorbidities (diabetes and hypertension), and measurement instruments. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic review and meta-analysis of 16 studies involving 26,301 participants was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. It analyzed observational studies (2000-2024) on depression in patients receiving hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or kidney transplantation. Data extraction included sample size, mean age, treatment duration, comorbidities, and measurement instruments. Random-effects models calculated the standardized mean differences and pooled prevalence estimates. Heterogeneity (Cochran's Q, I<sup>2</sup>) and publication bias (Egger's test) were assessed. <b>Results:</b> Depression prevalence was 35.56% (95% CI: 34.2-37.0%) in hemodialysis, 35.09% (95% CI: 33.5-36.7%) in peritoneal dialysis, and 25.33% (95% CI: 24.0-26.6%) in kidney transplant recipients. No significant differences were found between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Mean age, treatment duration, comorbidities, and measurement instruments were not significantly associated with depression prevalence. <b>Conclusions:</b> Kidney transplantation is linked to a lower depression prevalence than dialysis, while no significant differences exist between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. These findings highlight the need to ensure timely transplantation access and enhance psychological support for dialysis patients. Further research should explore psychosocial factors and targeted interventions to improve mental health in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12113119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15050179","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Depression is a common comorbidity in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing renal replacement therapy. This meta-analysis compares depression prevalence across hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation, considering mean age, treatment duration, comorbidities (diabetes and hypertension), and measurement instruments. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 16 studies involving 26,301 participants was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. It analyzed observational studies (2000-2024) on depression in patients receiving hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or kidney transplantation. Data extraction included sample size, mean age, treatment duration, comorbidities, and measurement instruments. Random-effects models calculated the standardized mean differences and pooled prevalence estimates. Heterogeneity (Cochran's Q, I2) and publication bias (Egger's test) were assessed. Results: Depression prevalence was 35.56% (95% CI: 34.2-37.0%) in hemodialysis, 35.09% (95% CI: 33.5-36.7%) in peritoneal dialysis, and 25.33% (95% CI: 24.0-26.6%) in kidney transplant recipients. No significant differences were found between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Mean age, treatment duration, comorbidities, and measurement instruments were not significantly associated with depression prevalence. Conclusions: Kidney transplantation is linked to a lower depression prevalence than dialysis, while no significant differences exist between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. These findings highlight the need to ensure timely transplantation access and enhance psychological support for dialysis patients. Further research should explore psychosocial factors and targeted interventions to improve mental health in this population.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.