Improving the accuracy of screening for large-for-gestational-age fetuses: a multicenter observational study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Benjamin Birene, Alexandre Ferreira, Emilie Raimond, Olivier Graesslin, Uzma Ishaque, René Gabriel
{"title":"Improving the accuracy of screening for large-for-gestational-age fetuses: a multicenter observational study.","authors":"Benjamin Birene, Alexandre Ferreira, Emilie Raimond, Olivier Graesslin, Uzma Ishaque, René Gabriel","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2025-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Large-for-gestational-age (LGA) fetuses present significant maternal and neonatal risks. However, prenatal screening is prone to inaccuracies, leading to potentially unnecessary interventions. This study aims to evaluate the factors influencing the accuracy of third-trimester screening for LGA fetuses to improving diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted involving low-risk pregnancies from three hospitals. Screening was analyzed using ultrasound-based fetal weight estimation (EFW), abdominal circumference (AC) and symphysial fundal height (SFH) measurements. EFW and AC were assessed either during the routine third-trimester ultrasound or during an additional growth ultrasound when available. Newborns were classified as LGA based on AUDIPOG growth curves. Screening performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), Youden's index and accuracy. We also evaluated composite screening tests combining biometric parameters with maternal clinical risk factors and influence of gestational age at the time of growth ultrasound to identify the optimal timing for screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2,217 women, risk factors such as high BMI and gestational diabetes increased suspicion of LGA fetuses, contributing to both true and false positive results (p<0.001). No single ultrasound parameter demonstrated superior diagnostic performance. Third-trimester ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 37 % [31-44 %] and a specificity of 94 % [93-95 %], while growth ultrasound improved sensitivity to 65 % [57-74 %] but reduced specificity to 82 % [79-85 %]. SFH measurements did not enhance screening performance. Overestimation of fetal weight was observed in 56.89 % (95/167) of cases, with errors exceeding 10 % in 26.95 % (122/167) of newborns. Combined screening using fetal biometry and maternal clinical risk factors showed high specificity but poor sensitivity, limiting their utility as standalone tools for detecting macrosomia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the impact of operator bias in LGA screening, with risk factors influencing measurements. The modest performance of ultrasound-based screening highlights the inherent limitations of current methods. These findings call for cautious labeling of LGA fetuses and development of management strategies to address the challenges of imprecise screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2025-0015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Large-for-gestational-age (LGA) fetuses present significant maternal and neonatal risks. However, prenatal screening is prone to inaccuracies, leading to potentially unnecessary interventions. This study aims to evaluate the factors influencing the accuracy of third-trimester screening for LGA fetuses to improving diagnostic accuracy.

Methods: A prospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted involving low-risk pregnancies from three hospitals. Screening was analyzed using ultrasound-based fetal weight estimation (EFW), abdominal circumference (AC) and symphysial fundal height (SFH) measurements. EFW and AC were assessed either during the routine third-trimester ultrasound or during an additional growth ultrasound when available. Newborns were classified as LGA based on AUDIPOG growth curves. Screening performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), Youden's index and accuracy. We also evaluated composite screening tests combining biometric parameters with maternal clinical risk factors and influence of gestational age at the time of growth ultrasound to identify the optimal timing for screening.

Results: Among 2,217 women, risk factors such as high BMI and gestational diabetes increased suspicion of LGA fetuses, contributing to both true and false positive results (p<0.001). No single ultrasound parameter demonstrated superior diagnostic performance. Third-trimester ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 37 % [31-44 %] and a specificity of 94 % [93-95 %], while growth ultrasound improved sensitivity to 65 % [57-74 %] but reduced specificity to 82 % [79-85 %]. SFH measurements did not enhance screening performance. Overestimation of fetal weight was observed in 56.89 % (95/167) of cases, with errors exceeding 10 % in 26.95 % (122/167) of newborns. Combined screening using fetal biometry and maternal clinical risk factors showed high specificity but poor sensitivity, limiting their utility as standalone tools for detecting macrosomia.

Conclusions: This study underscores the impact of operator bias in LGA screening, with risk factors influencing measurements. The modest performance of ultrasound-based screening highlights the inherent limitations of current methods. These findings call for cautious labeling of LGA fetuses and development of management strategies to address the challenges of imprecise screening.

提高大胎龄胎儿筛查的准确性:一项多中心观察性研究。
目的:大胎龄(LGA)胎儿存在显著的孕产妇和新生儿风险。然而,产前筛查容易出现不准确,导致潜在的不必要干预。本研究旨在探讨影响LGA胎儿妊娠晚期筛查准确性的因素,以提高诊断准确性。方法:对来自三家医院的低风险孕妇进行前瞻性、多中心队列研究。采用基于超声的胎儿体重估算(EFW)、腹围(AC)和腹侧对称高度(SFH)进行筛查分析。EFW和AC在常规妊娠晚期超声或在可用的额外生长超声期间进行评估。根据AUDIPOG生长曲线将新生儿分类为LGA。采用敏感性、特异性、预测值、诊断优势比(DOR)、约登指数(Youden’s index)和准确性评估筛查效果。我们还评估了结合生物特征参数、产妇临床危险因素和生长超声时胎龄影响的复合筛查试验,以确定最佳筛查时机。结果:在2217名女性中,高BMI和妊娠期糖尿病等危险因素增加了对LGA胎儿的怀疑,导致了真阳性和假阳性结果(结论:本研究强调了操作员偏差对LGA筛查的影响,危险因素影响测量结果。基于超声筛查的适度表现突出了当前方法的固有局限性。这些发现呼吁对LGA胎儿进行谨慎的标记,并制定管理策略,以解决不精确筛查的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信