Epidural anesthesia during labor and delivery and postpartum hemorrhage.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Maike Katja Sachs, Elisabeth Kapfhammer, Romana Brun, Lukas Kandler, Nicole Ochsenbein, Christian Haslinger
{"title":"Epidural anesthesia during labor and delivery and postpartum hemorrhage.","authors":"Maike Katja Sachs, Elisabeth Kapfhammer, Romana Brun, Lukas Kandler, Nicole Ochsenbein, Christian Haslinger","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2024-0567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Epidural analgesia is widely used for pain management during labor and delivery with inconsistent results regarding its influence on postpartum blood loss. Aim of our study was to investigate blood loss after vaginal delivery in women with epidural analgesia in consideration of established risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage and by using a validated blood measurement technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study was performed at the University Hospital Zurich. Included were 699 women with vaginal deliveries after 34 weeks of pregnancy. Blood loss was assessed by a validated measurement technique. Risk factors for increased blood loss were assessed and stratified by epidural analgesia use. Significant variables were entered into a stepwise multivariate regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the univariate analysis, women with epidural analgesia showed a significantly higher blood loss, compared to women without epidural analgesia. However, after multivariate regression analysis no association between increased blood loss and epidural anesthesia was observed. Furthermore, women with epidural analgesia were more often primiparous, experienced more often uterine atony and postpartum hemorrhage, bleeding from perineal laceration, vacuum extraction, longer second stage of labor and bigger neonatal head circumference.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Epidural analgesia itself is not associated with increased postpartum blood loss. However, there is a higher incidence of PPH in deliveries with obstetric risk factors, in which more frequent use of epidural analgesia is observed. In other words, not epidural analgesia is the cause of PPH, but difficult obstetric settings are associated with both higher use of epidural analgesia and increased blood loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0567","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Epidural analgesia is widely used for pain management during labor and delivery with inconsistent results regarding its influence on postpartum blood loss. Aim of our study was to investigate blood loss after vaginal delivery in women with epidural analgesia in consideration of established risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage and by using a validated blood measurement technique.

Methods: This prospective study was performed at the University Hospital Zurich. Included were 699 women with vaginal deliveries after 34 weeks of pregnancy. Blood loss was assessed by a validated measurement technique. Risk factors for increased blood loss were assessed and stratified by epidural analgesia use. Significant variables were entered into a stepwise multivariate regression analysis.

Results: In the univariate analysis, women with epidural analgesia showed a significantly higher blood loss, compared to women without epidural analgesia. However, after multivariate regression analysis no association between increased blood loss and epidural anesthesia was observed. Furthermore, women with epidural analgesia were more often primiparous, experienced more often uterine atony and postpartum hemorrhage, bleeding from perineal laceration, vacuum extraction, longer second stage of labor and bigger neonatal head circumference.

Conclusions: Epidural analgesia itself is not associated with increased postpartum blood loss. However, there is a higher incidence of PPH in deliveries with obstetric risk factors, in which more frequent use of epidural analgesia is observed. In other words, not epidural analgesia is the cause of PPH, but difficult obstetric settings are associated with both higher use of epidural analgesia and increased blood loss.

分娩和产后出血时的硬膜外麻醉。
目的:硬膜外镇痛被广泛应用于分娩过程中的疼痛管理,但其对产后失血的影响结果不一致。我们研究的目的是通过使用一种有效的血液测量技术,在考虑产后出血的已知危险因素的情况下,研究硬膜外镇痛妇女阴道分娩后的出血量。方法:本前瞻性研究在苏黎世大学医院进行。其中包括699名怀孕34周后阴道分娩的妇女。通过有效的测量技术评估失血量。通过使用硬膜外镇痛对失血增加的危险因素进行评估和分层。对显著变量进行逐步多元回归分析。结果:在单变量分析中,与没有硬膜外镇痛的女性相比,硬膜外镇痛的女性显着增加了失血量。然而,经过多变量回归分析,出血量增加与硬膜外麻醉之间没有关联。此外,硬膜外镇痛的妇女更容易发生初产,更容易发生子宫张力和产后出血,会阴撕裂出血,真空抽吸,第二产程更长,新生儿头围更大。结论:硬膜外镇痛本身与产后出血量增加无关。然而,在有产科危险因素的分娩中,PPH的发生率较高,其中观察到更频繁地使用硬膜外镇痛。换句话说,不是硬膜外镇痛是PPH的原因,但困难的产科环境与硬膜外镇痛的高使用和出血量增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信