The effect and toxicity profile of consolidative or salvage thoracic radiotherapy following chemoimmunotherapy in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Ruo-Zhou Sun, Dan Zong, Xin Chen, Yi-Zhi Ge, Ning Jiang, Li-Jun Zhao, Xue Song, Xia He, Xiang-Zhi Zhu
{"title":"The effect and toxicity profile of consolidative or salvage thoracic radiotherapy following chemoimmunotherapy in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Ruo-Zhou Sun, Dan Zong, Xin Chen, Yi-Zhi Ge, Ning Jiang, Li-Jun Zhao, Xue Song, Xia He, Xiang-Zhi Zhu","doi":"10.7555/JBR.39.20250067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) after first-line chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), focusing on the impact of different TRT timing strategies (consolidative vs. salvage) on survival. A total of 54 ES-SCLC patients treated between January 2019 and July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients receiving consolidative TRT (cTRT) within 3 months after first-line treatment completion were compared to those receiving salvage TRT (sTRT) following disease progression. Primary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS); safety was a secondary endpoint. The cTRT group (n=41) showed significantly longer median OS (26.6 vs. 14.8 months, P=0.048), PFS (12.9 vs. 3.5 months, P< 0.0001), and DMFS (10.7 vs. 3.4 months, P= 0.0044) than the sTRT group (n=13). Multivariate analysis identified cTRT as an independent favorable prognostic factor. No significant differences in OS or LRFS were found between high-dose (≥50 Gy) and low-dose (<50 Gy) TRT. Hematologic and respiratory toxicities were the most common adverse events, with acceptable tolerability. In conclusion, consolidative TRT after chemoimmunotherapy significantly improves survival outcomes in ES-SCLC patients, and low-dose TRT may be a suitable option.</p>","PeriodicalId":15061,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7555/JBR.39.20250067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) after first-line chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), focusing on the impact of different TRT timing strategies (consolidative vs. salvage) on survival. A total of 54 ES-SCLC patients treated between January 2019 and July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients receiving consolidative TRT (cTRT) within 3 months after first-line treatment completion were compared to those receiving salvage TRT (sTRT) following disease progression. Primary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS); safety was a secondary endpoint. The cTRT group (n=41) showed significantly longer median OS (26.6 vs. 14.8 months, P=0.048), PFS (12.9 vs. 3.5 months, P< 0.0001), and DMFS (10.7 vs. 3.4 months, P= 0.0044) than the sTRT group (n=13). Multivariate analysis identified cTRT as an independent favorable prognostic factor. No significant differences in OS or LRFS were found between high-dose (≥50 Gy) and low-dose (<50 Gy) TRT. Hematologic and respiratory toxicities were the most common adverse events, with acceptable tolerability. In conclusion, consolidative TRT after chemoimmunotherapy significantly improves survival outcomes in ES-SCLC patients, and low-dose TRT may be a suitable option.

广泛期小细胞肺癌患者化疗免疫治疗后巩固或挽救性胸部放疗的效果和毒性分析。
本研究评估了广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者在一线化疗或化疗免疫治疗后进行胸部放疗(TRT)的有效性和安全性,重点关注不同的TRT时间策略(巩固与挽救)对生存的影响。回顾性分析了2019年1月至2022年7月期间接受治疗的54例ES-SCLC患者。将一线治疗完成后3个月内接受巩固性TRT (cTRT)的患者与疾病进展后接受补救性TRT (sTRT)的患者进行比较。主要终点包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、局部无区域生存期(LRFS)和远端无转移生存期(DMFS);安全性是次要终点。cTRT组(n=41)的中位OS(26.6个月比14.8个月,P=0.048)、PFS(12.9个月比3.5个月,P< 0.0001)和DMFS(10.7个月比3.4个月,P= 0.0044)均显著长于sTRT组(n=13)。多变量分析表明cTRT是一个独立的有利预后因素。高剂量(≥50 Gy)和低剂量(≥50 Gy)在OS和LRFS方面无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Research
Journal of Biomedical Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信