{"title":"Evaluation of Physicochemical and Mechanical Properties of a Modified Adhesive System by Resveratrol Incorporation.","authors":"Amanda Guedes Nogueira Matuda, Karen Cristina Kazue Yui, Nathália Moreira Gomes, Gabriela da Silva Chagas, Marcella Batista Rocha, Fernanda Labiapari Senefonte, Mariane Cintra Mailart, Cesar Rogério Pucci","doi":"10.3390/jfb16050178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the physicochemical and mechanical properties of a modified adhesive system containing resveratrol by assessing its microtensile bond strength (µTBS), degree of conversion (DC), mini-flexural strength (MFS), and antibacterial activity. The modified etch-and-rinse adhesive system was prepared by resveratrol (RES) incorporation in different concentrations: adhesive with 0.5% RES (RES0.5), adhesive with 1% RES (RES1), adhesive with 2% RES (RES2), and adhesive with no RES incorporation (RES0-control group). The µTBS test was conducted on 40 human molars with dentin exposure, which were etched, bonded with the adhesives (<i>n</i> = 10), and restored with resin composite. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) measured the DC for the MFS; ten adhesive sticks were made for each group. Antibacterial activity was assessed using colony-forming unit (CFU) counts. For µTBS, no difference between the groups was found (mean ± SD): RES0.5-42.93 ± 15.49<sup>A</sup>; RES1-42.61 ± 13.97<sup>A</sup> and RES2-39.43 ± 9.14<sup>A</sup>; RES0-41.01 ± 2.64<sup>A</sup>. The DC (% ± SD) of the experimental groups was similar: RES0.5-81.02 ± 1.95<sup>A</sup>; RES1-76.02 ± 9.00<sup>A</sup>; RES2-58.86 ± 15.94<sup>A</sup>; RES0-77.75 ± 3.22<sup>A</sup>. For MFS (mean ± SD): RES0.5-33.14 ± 13.83<sup>A</sup>; RES1-31.1 ± 12.21<sup>A</sup>; RES2-19.72 ± 5.43<sup>B</sup>; RES0-29.72 ± 11.95<sup>A</sup>. For CFU (mean ± SD): RES0.5-0.67 × 10<sup>7</sup> ± 0.37<sup>B</sup>; RES1-0.68 × 10<sup>7</sup> ± 0.34<sup>B</sup>; RES2-0.60 × 10<sup>7</sup> ± 0.02<sup>C</sup>; RES0-0.75 × 10<sup>7</sup> ± 0.03<sup>A</sup>. The incorporation of resveratrol into the adhesive system at low concentrations (0.5 and 1%) does not alter the bond strength of the adhesive interface, the degree of conversion, or the flexural strength. Additionally, both concentrations exhibited antibacterial properties by reducing the colony-forming units of <i>S. mutans</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":15767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","volume":"16 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12112609/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16050178","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the physicochemical and mechanical properties of a modified adhesive system containing resveratrol by assessing its microtensile bond strength (µTBS), degree of conversion (DC), mini-flexural strength (MFS), and antibacterial activity. The modified etch-and-rinse adhesive system was prepared by resveratrol (RES) incorporation in different concentrations: adhesive with 0.5% RES (RES0.5), adhesive with 1% RES (RES1), adhesive with 2% RES (RES2), and adhesive with no RES incorporation (RES0-control group). The µTBS test was conducted on 40 human molars with dentin exposure, which were etched, bonded with the adhesives (n = 10), and restored with resin composite. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) measured the DC for the MFS; ten adhesive sticks were made for each group. Antibacterial activity was assessed using colony-forming unit (CFU) counts. For µTBS, no difference between the groups was found (mean ± SD): RES0.5-42.93 ± 15.49A; RES1-42.61 ± 13.97A and RES2-39.43 ± 9.14A; RES0-41.01 ± 2.64A. The DC (% ± SD) of the experimental groups was similar: RES0.5-81.02 ± 1.95A; RES1-76.02 ± 9.00A; RES2-58.86 ± 15.94A; RES0-77.75 ± 3.22A. For MFS (mean ± SD): RES0.5-33.14 ± 13.83A; RES1-31.1 ± 12.21A; RES2-19.72 ± 5.43B; RES0-29.72 ± 11.95A. For CFU (mean ± SD): RES0.5-0.67 × 107 ± 0.37B; RES1-0.68 × 107 ± 0.34B; RES2-0.60 × 107 ± 0.02C; RES0-0.75 × 107 ± 0.03A. The incorporation of resveratrol into the adhesive system at low concentrations (0.5 and 1%) does not alter the bond strength of the adhesive interface, the degree of conversion, or the flexural strength. Additionally, both concentrations exhibited antibacterial properties by reducing the colony-forming units of S. mutans.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Functional Biomaterials (JFB, ISSN 2079-4983) is an international and interdisciplinary scientific journal that publishes regular research papers (articles), reviews and short communications about applications of materials for biomedical use. JFB covers subjects from chemistry, pharmacy, biology, physics over to engineering. The journal focuses on the preparation, performance and use of functional biomaterials in biomedical devices and their behaviour in physiological environments. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Several topical special issues will be published. Scope: adhesion, adsorption, biocompatibility, biohybrid materials, bio-inert materials, biomaterials, biomedical devices, biomimetic materials, bone repair, cardiovascular devices, ceramics, composite materials, dental implants, dental materials, drug delivery systems, functional biopolymers, glasses, hyper branched polymers, molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), nanomedicine, nanoparticles, nanotechnology, natural materials, self-assembly smart materials, stimuli responsive materials, surface modification, tissue devices, tissue engineering, tissue-derived materials, urological devices.