Comparison of Ziemer LDV Z8 femtosecond laser pretreatment of cataract and conventional phacoemulsification in primary angle closure disease (PACD).

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Zhu Li Yap, Ho Lucius KangHua, Karen Kate Quilat, Hla Mynt Htoon, Wesley Guang Wei Chong, Rahat Husain, Rachel Shujuan Chong, Tina Tzee-Ling Wong
{"title":"Comparison of Ziemer LDV Z8 femtosecond laser pretreatment of cataract and conventional phacoemulsification in primary angle closure disease (PACD).","authors":"Zhu Li Yap, Ho Lucius KangHua, Karen Kate Quilat, Hla Mynt Htoon, Wesley Guang Wei Chong, Rahat Husain, Rachel Shujuan Chong, Tina Tzee-Ling Wong","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Determine if FLACS in PACD is safe and if predicted IOP rise would lead to long-term sequelae.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Singapore National Eye Centre.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective randomised control study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects with stable PACD and pre-existing LPIs were randomised to FLACS, or conventional phacoemulsification (control). The former underwent pre-treatment using the Ziemer LDVZ8 docking system. Supine IOP was measured at 4 time-points using an applanation tonometer - prior to speculum insertion, with speculum in-situ, with suction on, and 1 minute after suction off. The control group had IOP measured at the first 2 time points. HVF and OCT RNFL measurements were performed preoperatively, 6- and 12-months post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>57 eyes successfully treated. In both groups, mean IOP prior to and after speculum placement was similar. In the FLACS group, mean IOP during suction was 78.67mmHg (SD 12.07) and 1 minute post release of suction was 16.92mmHg (SD 3.68). Mean preoperative VF mean deviation (MD) for both groups was similar, -5.07 ± 3.17 SD in the FLACS group and -5.68 ± 4.77 in the control group, with improvement in both at 1 year, to -4.15 ± 5.49 and -2.25 ± 6.08 respectively. In the FLACS group, the average RNFL thickness pre- and post-operatively was 73.2 ± 25.1 SD and 87.9 ± 9.9 SD. In the controls, the average RNFL thickness pre- and post-operatively was 81.9 ± 21.4 SD and 81.5 ± 20.8 SD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The transient increase in IOP induced by FLACS did not increase glaucomatous damage in PACD eyes after 1 year.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001691","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Determine if FLACS in PACD is safe and if predicted IOP rise would lead to long-term sequelae.

Setting: Singapore National Eye Centre.

Design: Prospective randomised control study.

Methods: Subjects with stable PACD and pre-existing LPIs were randomised to FLACS, or conventional phacoemulsification (control). The former underwent pre-treatment using the Ziemer LDVZ8 docking system. Supine IOP was measured at 4 time-points using an applanation tonometer - prior to speculum insertion, with speculum in-situ, with suction on, and 1 minute after suction off. The control group had IOP measured at the first 2 time points. HVF and OCT RNFL measurements were performed preoperatively, 6- and 12-months post-operatively.

Results: 57 eyes successfully treated. In both groups, mean IOP prior to and after speculum placement was similar. In the FLACS group, mean IOP during suction was 78.67mmHg (SD 12.07) and 1 minute post release of suction was 16.92mmHg (SD 3.68). Mean preoperative VF mean deviation (MD) for both groups was similar, -5.07 ± 3.17 SD in the FLACS group and -5.68 ± 4.77 in the control group, with improvement in both at 1 year, to -4.15 ± 5.49 and -2.25 ± 6.08 respectively. In the FLACS group, the average RNFL thickness pre- and post-operatively was 73.2 ± 25.1 SD and 87.9 ± 9.9 SD. In the controls, the average RNFL thickness pre- and post-operatively was 81.9 ± 21.4 SD and 81.5 ± 20.8 SD.

Conclusions: The transient increase in IOP induced by FLACS did not increase glaucomatous damage in PACD eyes after 1 year.

Ziemer LDV Z8飞秒激光预处理白内障与常规超声乳化术治疗原发性闭角症的比较。
目的:确定PACD患者FLACS是否安全,预测IOP升高是否会导致长期后遗症。地点:新加坡国家眼科中心。设计:前瞻性随机对照研究。方法:稳定性PACD和既往lpi患者随机分为FLACS组和常规超声乳化术组(对照组)。前者使用Ziemer LDVZ8对接系统进行预处理。使用压平眼压计在4个时间点测量仰卧眼压,分别是插入镜前、镜原位、开吸和关闭吸后1分钟。对照组在前2个时间点测量IOP。术前、术后6个月和12个月分别进行HVF和OCT RNFL测量。结果:成功治疗57只眼。在两组中,放置镜前后的平均IOP相似。FLACS组抽吸时平均IOP为78.67mmHg (SD 12.07),抽吸解除后1分钟平均IOP为16.92mmHg (SD 3.68)。两组的平均术前VF平均偏差(MD)相似,FLACS组为-5.07±3.17 SD,对照组为-5.68±4.77,1年后两者均有所改善,分别为-4.15±5.49和-2.25±6.08。FLACS组术后RNFL平均厚度分别为73.2±25.1 SD和87.9±9.9 SD。对照组术前、术后RNFL平均厚度分别为81.9±21.4 SD和81.5±20.8 SD。结论:FLACS引起的短暂性IOP升高并没有增加PACD眼1年后青光眼的损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信