Comparison of Conventional Keratometry and Total Keratometry in Untreated Myopic Eyes and Eyes After Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction (KLEx).

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Anouar Meziane Elotmani, Anke Messerschmidt-Roth, Walter Sekundo
{"title":"Comparison of Conventional Keratometry and Total Keratometry in Untreated Myopic Eyes and Eyes After Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction (KLEx).","authors":"Anouar Meziane Elotmani, Anke Messerschmidt-Roth, Walter Sekundo","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Aim was to evaluate the differences between conventional keratometry values and Total Keratometry (TK) before and after keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx). Additionally, correlations with central corneal thickness (CCT) and other variables were assessed in this study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University Eye Hospital Marburg, Germany.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective exploratory comparative study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>K-values and TK-values of 98 eyes were measured using an IOL Master 700 before and after KLEx. Statistical analyses, including paired t-tests and Bland-Altman analyses, were performed to compare the two measurement methods. Correlations were analysed between changes in CCT, amount of laser vision correction, and differences in K- and TK-values after KLEx.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences between K-values and TK-values were observed both pre- and postoperatively (p<0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated preoperatively a bias of 0.07 D (95% CI bias: 0.049 to 0.090), while postoperatively, the bias was 0.427 D (95% CI bias: -0.474 to -0.38). A strong relationship between the amount of reduction in CCT and the difference between K- and TK-values after KLEx (R2 = 0.751, p < 0.0001) was revealed. Similarly, regression analysis showed a robust association between the amount of laser vision correction and the difference between K- and TK-values after KLEx (R2 = 0.788, p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that TK-values provide a more comprehensive assessment of corneal power, especially after KLEx, where changes in the posterior corneal surface become increasingly significant. The correlations suggest that patients with higher degrees of preexistent myopia or significant amount of laser ablation require special consideration in their refractive corneal assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001690","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Aim was to evaluate the differences between conventional keratometry values and Total Keratometry (TK) before and after keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx). Additionally, correlations with central corneal thickness (CCT) and other variables were assessed in this study.

Setting: University Eye Hospital Marburg, Germany.

Design: Retrospective exploratory comparative study.

Methods: K-values and TK-values of 98 eyes were measured using an IOL Master 700 before and after KLEx. Statistical analyses, including paired t-tests and Bland-Altman analyses, were performed to compare the two measurement methods. Correlations were analysed between changes in CCT, amount of laser vision correction, and differences in K- and TK-values after KLEx.

Results: Significant differences between K-values and TK-values were observed both pre- and postoperatively (p<0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated preoperatively a bias of 0.07 D (95% CI bias: 0.049 to 0.090), while postoperatively, the bias was 0.427 D (95% CI bias: -0.474 to -0.38). A strong relationship between the amount of reduction in CCT and the difference between K- and TK-values after KLEx (R2 = 0.751, p < 0.0001) was revealed. Similarly, regression analysis showed a robust association between the amount of laser vision correction and the difference between K- and TK-values after KLEx (R2 = 0.788, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that TK-values provide a more comprehensive assessment of corneal power, especially after KLEx, where changes in the posterior corneal surface become increasingly significant. The correlations suggest that patients with higher degrees of preexistent myopia or significant amount of laser ablation require special consideration in their refractive corneal assessments.

未经治疗的近视眼与角膜屈光性晶状体摘除术后的常规角膜测量与全角膜测量比较。
目的:评价角膜屈光透镜摘出术(KLEx)前后常规角膜测量值与全角膜测量值(TK)的差异。此外,本研究还评估了与中央角膜厚度(CCT)和其他变量的相关性。地点:德国马尔堡大学眼科医院。设计:回顾性探索性比较研究。方法:用IOL Master 700对98只眼进行KLEx手术前后的k值和tk值测定。统计分析,包括配对t检验和Bland-Altman分析,比较两种测量方法。分析KLEx术后CCT变化、激光视力矫正量与K-和tk值差异之间的相关性。结果:k值和tk值在术前和术后均有显著差异(p)。结论:本研究表明,tk值可以更全面地评估角膜力,特别是在KLEx术后,角膜后表面的变化越来越明显。相关性表明,先前存在高度近视或大量激光消融的患者在屈光性角膜评估中需要特别考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信