Trading off Iodine and Radiation Dose in Coronary Computed Tomography.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Guillaume Fahrni, Thomas Saliba, Damien Racine, Marianna Gulizia, Georgios Tzimas, Chiara Pozzessere, David C Rotzinger
{"title":"Trading off Iodine and Radiation Dose in Coronary Computed Tomography.","authors":"Guillaume Fahrni, Thomas Saliba, Damien Racine, Marianna Gulizia, Georgios Tzimas, Chiara Pozzessere, David C Rotzinger","doi":"10.3390/jcdd12050195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has seen steady progress since its inception, becoming a key player in the non-invasive assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). Advancements in CT technology, including iterative and deep-learning-based reconstruction, wide-area detectors, and dual-source systems, have helped mitigate early limitations, such as high radiation doses, motion artifacts, high iodine load, and non-diagnostic image quality. However, the adjustments between ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast material (CM) volumes remain a critical concern, especially due to the increasing use of CCTA in various indications. This review explores the balance between radiation and CM volumes, emphasizing patient-specific protocol optimization to improve diagnostic accuracy while minimizing risks. Radiation dose reduction strategies, such as low tube voltage protocols, prospective ECG-gating, and modern reconstruction algorithms, have significantly decreased radiation exposure, with some studies achieving sub-millisievert doses. Similarly, CM volume optimization, including adjustments in strategies for calculating CM volume, iodine concentration, and flow protocols, plays a role in managing risks such as contrast-associated acute kidney injury, particularly in patients with renal impairment. Emerging technologies, such as photon-counting CT and deep-learning reconstruction, promise further improvements in dose efficiency and image quality. This review summarizes current evidence, highlights the benefits and limitations of dose control approaches, and provides practical recommendations for practitioners. By tailoring protocols to patient characteristics, such as age, renal function, and body habitus, clinicians can achieve an optimal trade-off between diagnostic accuracy and patient safety, ensuring optimal operation of CT systems in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"12 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12112519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12050195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has seen steady progress since its inception, becoming a key player in the non-invasive assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). Advancements in CT technology, including iterative and deep-learning-based reconstruction, wide-area detectors, and dual-source systems, have helped mitigate early limitations, such as high radiation doses, motion artifacts, high iodine load, and non-diagnostic image quality. However, the adjustments between ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast material (CM) volumes remain a critical concern, especially due to the increasing use of CCTA in various indications. This review explores the balance between radiation and CM volumes, emphasizing patient-specific protocol optimization to improve diagnostic accuracy while minimizing risks. Radiation dose reduction strategies, such as low tube voltage protocols, prospective ECG-gating, and modern reconstruction algorithms, have significantly decreased radiation exposure, with some studies achieving sub-millisievert doses. Similarly, CM volume optimization, including adjustments in strategies for calculating CM volume, iodine concentration, and flow protocols, plays a role in managing risks such as contrast-associated acute kidney injury, particularly in patients with renal impairment. Emerging technologies, such as photon-counting CT and deep-learning reconstruction, promise further improvements in dose efficiency and image quality. This review summarizes current evidence, highlights the benefits and limitations of dose control approaches, and provides practical recommendations for practitioners. By tailoring protocols to patient characteristics, such as age, renal function, and body habitus, clinicians can achieve an optimal trade-off between diagnostic accuracy and patient safety, ensuring optimal operation of CT systems in clinical practice.

冠状动脉计算机断层扫描中碘与辐射剂量的权衡。
冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)自诞生以来取得了稳步发展,成为冠状动脉疾病(CAD)无创评估的关键角色。CT技术的进步,包括迭代和基于深度学习的重建、广域探测器和双源系统,有助于缓解早期的局限性,如高辐射剂量、运动伪影、高碘负荷和非诊断性图像质量。然而,电离辐射和碘化造影剂(CM)体积之间的调整仍然是一个关键问题,特别是由于CCTA在各种适应症中的使用越来越多。这篇综述探讨了辐射和CM体积之间的平衡,强调了针对患者的方案优化,以提高诊断准确性,同时最大限度地降低风险。辐射剂量降低策略,如低管电压方案、前瞻性心电图门控和现代重建算法,显著降低了辐射暴露,一些研究达到了亚毫西弗剂量。同样,CM体积优化,包括计算CM体积、碘浓度和流量方案的策略调整,在管理造影剂相关急性肾损伤等风险中发挥作用,特别是在肾功能损害患者中。新兴技术,如光子计数CT和深度学习重建,有望进一步提高剂量效率和图像质量。本综述总结了目前的证据,强调了剂量控制方法的优点和局限性,并为从业人员提供了实用的建议。通过根据患者特征(如年龄、肾功能和身体习惯)定制方案,临床医生可以在诊断准确性和患者安全之间实现最佳权衡,确保CT系统在临床实践中的最佳运行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
381
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信