Mandibular Kinematics on an Orthodontic Population Assessed with an Optical Jaw Tracking System: A Comparative Study.

IF 3.1 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Joana Silva, Ariana Azevedo, Eugénio Martins, Alberto Canabez, Domingo Martin, Conchita Martin
{"title":"Mandibular Kinematics on an Orthodontic Population Assessed with an Optical Jaw Tracking System: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Joana Silva, Ariana Azevedo, Eugénio Martins, Alberto Canabez, Domingo Martin, Conchita Martin","doi":"10.3390/dj13050184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: To evaluate mandibular kinematics in an orthodontic population using the Modjaw<sup>®</sup> optical jaw tracking system. <b>Materials and methods</b>: A total of 154 orthodontic patients underwent mandibular kinematic analysis using the Modjaw<sup>®</sup> system. ANB values determined skeletal classification, while dental classification was assessed on digital casts. The Modjaw<sup>®</sup> records were taken as instructed by the manufacturer, and data collected from the readings included the discrepancy between centric occlusion and maximum intercuspation, maximum opening, Bennett angles, and sagittal condylar guidance. The presence or absence of temporomandibular disorders was determined by the DC-TMD questionnaires. Non-parametric tests and Spearman correlations were applied for the statistical analysis. <b>Results</b>: Significant differences in mandibular kinematics were observed between skeletal classes, particularly in CO-MI discrepancies, Bennett angles, and maximum opening (<i>p</i> < 0.05). TMD symptoms were associated with higher absolute CO-MI discrepancies but did not significantly alter other kinematic parameters. Weak correlations were found between sagittal condylar guidance and anterior guidance variables. <b>Conclusions</b>: Mandibular kinematics differ by skeletal classification, with Class III patients demonstrating distinct patterns. While TMD symptoms impact CO-MI discrepancies, overall mandibular dynamics remain consistent.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12110127/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13050184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate mandibular kinematics in an orthodontic population using the Modjaw® optical jaw tracking system. Materials and methods: A total of 154 orthodontic patients underwent mandibular kinematic analysis using the Modjaw® system. ANB values determined skeletal classification, while dental classification was assessed on digital casts. The Modjaw® records were taken as instructed by the manufacturer, and data collected from the readings included the discrepancy between centric occlusion and maximum intercuspation, maximum opening, Bennett angles, and sagittal condylar guidance. The presence or absence of temporomandibular disorders was determined by the DC-TMD questionnaires. Non-parametric tests and Spearman correlations were applied for the statistical analysis. Results: Significant differences in mandibular kinematics were observed between skeletal classes, particularly in CO-MI discrepancies, Bennett angles, and maximum opening (p < 0.05). TMD symptoms were associated with higher absolute CO-MI discrepancies but did not significantly alter other kinematic parameters. Weak correlations were found between sagittal condylar guidance and anterior guidance variables. Conclusions: Mandibular kinematics differ by skeletal classification, with Class III patients demonstrating distinct patterns. While TMD symptoms impact CO-MI discrepancies, overall mandibular dynamics remain consistent.

用光学下颌跟踪系统评估正畸人群的下颌运动学:一项比较研究。
目的:利用Modjaw®光学下颌跟踪系统评估正畸人群的下颌运动学。材料和方法:使用Modjaw®系统对154例正畸患者进行下颌运动学分析。ANB值确定骨骼分类,而牙齿分类评估数字模型。Modjaw®记录是按照制造商的指示进行的,从读数中收集的数据包括中心闭塞与最大间隔、最大开口、Bennett角和矢状髁引导之间的差异。颞下颌紊乱的存在与否由DC-TMD问卷确定。采用非参数检验和Spearman相关进行统计分析。结果:不同骨骼类别的下颌运动学有显著差异,特别是CO-MI差异、Bennett角和最大开口(p < 0.05)。TMD症状与较高的绝对CO-MI差异相关,但没有显著改变其他运动学参数。矢状突导向与前路导向变量之间存在弱相关性。结论:下颌运动因骨骼分类而异,III类患者表现出不同的模式。虽然TMD症状影响CO-MI差异,但整体下颌动力学保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信