Pierre Loap, Jeremi Vu-Bezin, Ludovic De Marzi, Youlia Kirova
{"title":"Impact of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and fractionation on immune system exposure in breast radiotherapy.","authors":"Pierre Loap, Jeremi Vu-Bezin, Ludovic De Marzi, Youlia Kirova","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The immune system has been recognized as an organ-at-risk in esophageal and lung cancers. The potential impact of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and fractionation on immune system preservation in breast radiation therapy is presently unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the magnitude of the benefit of DIBH and hypofractionation on immune system exposure in adjuvant irradiation of right breast cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten consecutive patients treated volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT)with DIBH for adjuvant locoregional irradiation of the right breast where included. The effective dose to the immune system (EDIC) was calculated for each patient (the absolute contribution of the lungs, heart, liver and total integral dose to the EDIC was evaluated) based on normofractionated and hypofractionated regimens, with or without DIBH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EDIC was significantly lower in DIBH than in free breathing, both in standard fractionation (2.81 Gy [range: 2.44; 3.38] vs. 3.1 Gy [2.63; 3.94], p < 0. 01) and hypofractionation (2.15 Gy [1.87; 2.58] vs. 2.35 Gy [2.02; 2.96], p < 0.01), corresponding to a relative EDIC reduction of approximately 10% with DIBH. EDIC was lower with hypofractionation with free breathing than with conventional fractionation with DIBH (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DIBH significantly reduces the dose to the immune system by 10% in cases of locoregional irradiation of right breast cancers, and moderate hypofractionation results in an EDIC gain compared with any standard fractionation treatment. Pending formal demonstration of a relationship between dose to the immune system and survival, as is the case in other localizations, we suggest as a precaution the use of DIBH combined with hypofractionated treatment in cases where immune sparing seems most important, such as breast cancers with a poor response after preoperative immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>DIBH significantly reduces the dose to the immune system by 10% in cases of locoregional irradiation of right breast cancers, and moderate hypofractionation results in an EDIC gain compared with any standard fractionation treatment. Pending formal demonstration of a relationship between dose to the immune system and survival, as is the case in other localizations, we suggest as a precaution the use of DIBH combined with hypofractionated treatment in cases where immune sparing seems most important, such as breast cancers with a poor response after preoperative immunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The immune system has been recognized as an organ-at-risk in esophageal and lung cancers. The potential impact of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and fractionation on immune system preservation in breast radiation therapy is presently unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the magnitude of the benefit of DIBH and hypofractionation on immune system exposure in adjuvant irradiation of right breast cancers.
Methods: Ten consecutive patients treated volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT)with DIBH for adjuvant locoregional irradiation of the right breast where included. The effective dose to the immune system (EDIC) was calculated for each patient (the absolute contribution of the lungs, heart, liver and total integral dose to the EDIC was evaluated) based on normofractionated and hypofractionated regimens, with or without DIBH.
Results: EDIC was significantly lower in DIBH than in free breathing, both in standard fractionation (2.81 Gy [range: 2.44; 3.38] vs. 3.1 Gy [2.63; 3.94], p < 0. 01) and hypofractionation (2.15 Gy [1.87; 2.58] vs. 2.35 Gy [2.02; 2.96], p < 0.01), corresponding to a relative EDIC reduction of approximately 10% with DIBH. EDIC was lower with hypofractionation with free breathing than with conventional fractionation with DIBH (p < 0.01).
Conclusion: DIBH significantly reduces the dose to the immune system by 10% in cases of locoregional irradiation of right breast cancers, and moderate hypofractionation results in an EDIC gain compared with any standard fractionation treatment. Pending formal demonstration of a relationship between dose to the immune system and survival, as is the case in other localizations, we suggest as a precaution the use of DIBH combined with hypofractionated treatment in cases where immune sparing seems most important, such as breast cancers with a poor response after preoperative immunotherapy.
Advances in knowledge: DIBH significantly reduces the dose to the immune system by 10% in cases of locoregional irradiation of right breast cancers, and moderate hypofractionation results in an EDIC gain compared with any standard fractionation treatment. Pending formal demonstration of a relationship between dose to the immune system and survival, as is the case in other localizations, we suggest as a precaution the use of DIBH combined with hypofractionated treatment in cases where immune sparing seems most important, such as breast cancers with a poor response after preoperative immunotherapy.
期刊介绍:
BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences.
Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840
- Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks
- ISSN: 0007-1285
- eISSN: 1748-880X
Open Access option