Impact of Coronary Artery Disease on Cardiovascular Outcomes Differs Between Men and Women With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kayla Brown, Ke Xu, Rebecca T Hahn, Philippe Pibarot, Jonathon Leipsic, Ying Ma, Marie-Annick Clavel, Sammy Elmariah, Neil J Weissman, Federico M Asch, Omar Khalique, Martin B Leon, Paul Cremer, Brian R Lindman, Maria C Alu, Pamela S Douglas, Melissa A Daubert
{"title":"Impact of Coronary Artery Disease on Cardiovascular Outcomes Differs Between Men and Women With Severe Aortic Stenosis.","authors":"Kayla Brown, Ke Xu, Rebecca T Hahn, Philippe Pibarot, Jonathon Leipsic, Ying Ma, Marie-Annick Clavel, Sammy Elmariah, Neil J Weissman, Federico M Asch, Omar Khalique, Martin B Leon, Paul Cremer, Brian R Lindman, Maria C Alu, Pamela S Douglas, Melissa A Daubert","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is heterogeneity in coronary artery disease (CAD) severity among individuals with severe aortic stenosis (AS), but whether this differentially influences prognosis is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with severe AS in the PARTNER 1, 2, and 3 trials and registries (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) were stratified by obstructive CAD (coronary stenosis ≥50%, prior myocardial infarction, or revascularization) or no obstructive CAD (all stenoses <50%). Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models examined the association between CAD severity groups and clinical outcomes. The primary composite end point was death, heart failure hospitalization, or stroke at 5 years. Interaction between sex and CAD severity was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 7505 patients with severe AS, 2062 (27.5%) had no obstructive CAD and were more likely to be women (60.5%) with fewer CAD risk factors. After multivariable adjustment, the primary end point was significantly lower among patients with no obstructive CAD compared with those with obstructive CAD (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.92 [CI, 0.84-1.00]; <i>P</i>=0.04), irrespective of AS treatment. However, there were significant differences by sex (<i>P</i><sub>interaction</sub>=0.0002). Men with no obstructive CAD had a 16% lower event rate compared with men with obstructive CAD (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.84 [CI, 0.73-0.96]; <i>P</i>=0.01). In contrast, women with no obstructive CAD did not have a significantly lower rate of death, stroke, or heart failure hospitalization compared with women with obstructive CAD (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.95 [CI, 0.85-1.07]; <i>P</i>=0.41). Women with no obstructive CAD had a more advanced heart failure phenotype and higher event rates compared with men with no obstructive CAD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Obstructive CAD was associated with a higher risk of long-term adverse events after treatment for severe AS, but there was a significant sex disparity in clinical outcomes among men and women with no obstructive CAD. Further study is needed to optimize the evaluation and management of women with severe AS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":"e014999"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014999","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is heterogeneity in coronary artery disease (CAD) severity among individuals with severe aortic stenosis (AS), but whether this differentially influences prognosis is unknown.

Methods: Patients with severe AS in the PARTNER 1, 2, and 3 trials and registries (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) were stratified by obstructive CAD (coronary stenosis ≥50%, prior myocardial infarction, or revascularization) or no obstructive CAD (all stenoses <50%). Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models examined the association between CAD severity groups and clinical outcomes. The primary composite end point was death, heart failure hospitalization, or stroke at 5 years. Interaction between sex and CAD severity was evaluated.

Results: Among 7505 patients with severe AS, 2062 (27.5%) had no obstructive CAD and were more likely to be women (60.5%) with fewer CAD risk factors. After multivariable adjustment, the primary end point was significantly lower among patients with no obstructive CAD compared with those with obstructive CAD (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.92 [CI, 0.84-1.00]; P=0.04), irrespective of AS treatment. However, there were significant differences by sex (Pinteraction=0.0002). Men with no obstructive CAD had a 16% lower event rate compared with men with obstructive CAD (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.84 [CI, 0.73-0.96]; P=0.01). In contrast, women with no obstructive CAD did not have a significantly lower rate of death, stroke, or heart failure hospitalization compared with women with obstructive CAD (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.95 [CI, 0.85-1.07]; P=0.41). Women with no obstructive CAD had a more advanced heart failure phenotype and higher event rates compared with men with no obstructive CAD.

Conclusions: Obstructive CAD was associated with a higher risk of long-term adverse events after treatment for severe AS, but there was a significant sex disparity in clinical outcomes among men and women with no obstructive CAD. Further study is needed to optimize the evaluation and management of women with severe AS.

冠状动脉疾病对严重主动脉狭窄患者心血管结局的影响在男性和女性之间存在差异
背景:严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)严重程度存在异质性,但这是否会对预后产生差异尚不清楚。方法:PARTNER 1、2和3试验和登记(经导管主动脉瓣置入术)中的严重AS患者按阻塞性CAD(冠状动脉狭窄≥50%,既往心肌梗死或血运重建术)或无阻塞性CAD(所有狭窄)进行分层。结果:在7505例严重AS患者中,2062例(27.5%)无阻塞性CAD,且更可能是CAD危险因素较少的女性(60.5%)。多变量校正后,非阻塞性CAD患者的主要终点明显低于阻塞性CAD患者(校正风险比,0.92 [CI, 0.84-1.00];P=0.04),与AS治疗无关。然而,性别间存在显著差异(p - interaction=0.0002)。非阻塞性CAD患者的事件发生率比阻塞性CAD患者低16%(校正风险比,0.84 [CI, 0.73-0.96];P = 0.01)。相比之下,与患有阻塞性CAD的女性相比,无阻塞性CAD的女性的死亡率、卒中或心力衰竭住院率并没有显著降低(校正风险比为0.95 [CI, 0.85-1.07];P = 0.41)。与没有梗阻性CAD的男性相比,没有梗阻性CAD的女性有更晚期的心力衰竭表型和更高的事件发生率。结论:阻塞性CAD与严重AS治疗后长期不良事件的高风险相关,但在没有阻塞性CAD的男性和女性中,临床结果存在显著的性别差异。对女性重度AS患者的评价和管理有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信