Development and external validation of a predictive model of nondiagnostic results in patients undergoing CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle lung biopsy.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yonghao Du, Linyun Yang, Xuyin Zhang, Ting Liang, Shaonong Dang, Shanshan Liu, Rong Wang, Gang Niu
{"title":"Development and external validation of a predictive model of nondiagnostic results in patients undergoing CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle lung biopsy.","authors":"Yonghao Du, Linyun Yang, Xuyin Zhang, Ting Liang, Shaonong Dang, Shanshan Liu, Rong Wang, Gang Niu","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and validate a nomogram to predict nondiagnostic results in patients undergoing CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) of the lung.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 954 PTNBs in the training cohort and 186 PTNBs in the external validation cohort were retrospectively included. PTNB results were categorized as diagnostic or nondiagnostic. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of nondiagnostic results. C-statistic, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 954 PTNBs in the training cohort, 280 (29.4%) were nondiagnostic results. The model included six independent predictors: age at biopsy, lesion size, lobulation sign, air bronchogram, the number of samples, and pre-test probability. The C-statistics for the training and external validation cohorts were 0.752 and 0.734, respectively. Two risk groups were identified with low (<40%) and high (≥40%) probabilities of nondiagnostic results. For lesions of low risk with the number of samples ≤ 2, ≤2 samples should be obtained; for lesions of low risk with the number of samples ≥3, more samples should be obtained when appropriate; for lesions of high risk with the number of samples ≥3, PTNB needs to be reconsidered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The nomogram showed good performance in predicting the nondiagnostic results of PTNB of the lung. Suggestions for each risk group may facilitate clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>Pretest probability was a significant factor to predict nondiagnostic results of PTNB. The number of samples of PTNB should be different for different risk groups to avoid nondiagnostic results.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and validate a nomogram to predict nondiagnostic results in patients undergoing CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) of the lung.

Methods: A total of 954 PTNBs in the training cohort and 186 PTNBs in the external validation cohort were retrospectively included. PTNB results were categorized as diagnostic or nondiagnostic. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of nondiagnostic results. C-statistic, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness, respectively.

Results: Of 954 PTNBs in the training cohort, 280 (29.4%) were nondiagnostic results. The model included six independent predictors: age at biopsy, lesion size, lobulation sign, air bronchogram, the number of samples, and pre-test probability. The C-statistics for the training and external validation cohorts were 0.752 and 0.734, respectively. Two risk groups were identified with low (<40%) and high (≥40%) probabilities of nondiagnostic results. For lesions of low risk with the number of samples ≤ 2, ≤2 samples should be obtained; for lesions of low risk with the number of samples ≥3, more samples should be obtained when appropriate; for lesions of high risk with the number of samples ≥3, PTNB needs to be reconsidered.

Conclusions: The nomogram showed good performance in predicting the nondiagnostic results of PTNB of the lung. Suggestions for each risk group may facilitate clinical practice.

Advances in knowledge: Pretest probability was a significant factor to predict nondiagnostic results of PTNB. The number of samples of PTNB should be different for different risk groups to avoid nondiagnostic results.

ct引导下经皮经胸肺穿刺活检患者非诊断性结果预测模型的建立和外部验证。
目的:开发并验证一种扫描图,用于预测ct引导下经皮经胸肺穿刺活检(PTNB)患者的非诊断结果。方法:回顾性分析培训组954例ptnb和外部验证组186例ptnb。PTNB结果分为诊断性和非诊断性。使用逻辑回归来确定非诊断结果的独立预测因子。c统计量、校准曲线和决策曲线分析分别用于评估discrimination、calibration和临床有用性。结果:在培训队列的954例ptnb中,280例(29.4%)为非诊断结果。该模型包括6个独立的预测因素:活检年龄、病变大小、分叶征、空气支气管图、样本数量和检测前概率。训练队列和外部验证队列的c统计量分别为0.752和0.734。结论:nomogram在预测肺PTNB的非诊断性结果方面表现良好。针对每个风险群体提出的建议有助于临床实践。知识进展:预测概率是预测PTNB非诊断结果的重要因素。不同危险人群的PTNB样本数量应有所不同,以避免出现非诊断性结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信