Comparison of the clinical and prognostic characteristics of patients with different pathological types in acromegaly.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Frontiers in Endocrinology Pub Date : 2025-05-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fendo.2025.1571598
Liye Chong, Yuxing Lou, Xue Chen, Wenji Zhao, Wei Zhang, Ziwei Zhang, Fan Yang, Ping Li
{"title":"Comparison of the clinical and prognostic characteristics of patients with different pathological types in acromegaly.","authors":"Liye Chong, Yuxing Lou, Xue Chen, Wenji Zhao, Wei Zhang, Ziwei Zhang, Fan Yang, Ping Li","doi":"10.3389/fendo.2025.1571598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Acromegaly is caused by somatotroph tumors. Recently, the WHO recommended the use of transcription factors (TFs) together with pituitary hormones to accurately classify the subtypes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate differences in the clinical and prognostic characteristics of acromegaly patients with different pathological types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 94 acromegaly patients who underwent surgical treatment. Patients were classified into two groups on the basis of TFs expression by IHC. PIT1 tumors were positive only for PIT1, and PIT1/SF1 tumors were positive for both PIT1 and SF1. Additionally, on the basis of the expression of GH and PRL by IHC, PIT1 tumors were further subdivided into GH positive tumors (those positive for only GH) and GH/PRL positive tumors (those positive for both GH and PRL). Differences in clinical and prognostic features among the pathological groups were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PIT1/SF1 tumors represented 30.9% (n = 29) of the acromegaly patients in this cohort. PIT1/SF1 tumors had a higher baseline IGF-1 index (2.77 ± 0.73 vs. 2.39 ± 0.74, <i>P</i> = 0.024) than PIT1 tumors. Despite the higher proportion of postoperative GH < 1 μg/L, the biochemical remission rate of PIT1/SF1 tumors (30.8% vs. 27.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.812) was similar to that of PIT1 tumors. Compared with those with GH positive tumors, patients with GH/PRL positive tumors were younger at diagnosis (42.50 ± 13.36 vs. 49.05 ± 11.69, <i>P</i> = 0.046), and the proportion of male patients was higher (50.0% vs. 23.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.048). Furthermore, patients with GH/PRL positive tumors had a significantly higher postoperative GH level [7.30 (3.18-11.08) vs. 2.49 (1.57-6.84), <i>P</i> = 0.011] and IGF-1 index (1.82 ± 0.94 vs. 1.31 ± 0.63, <i>P</i> = 0.011) during follow-up. The biochemical remission rate in GH/PRL positive tumors was lower, but the difference was not statistically significant (18.2% vs. 37.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.159).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PIT1/SF1 tumors represent approximately 30.0% of acromegaly patients. Despite higher baseline IGF-1 levels, the clinical and prognostic features of patients with PIT1/SF1 tumors are similar to those of patients with PIT1 tumors. GH/PRL positive tumors, characterized by their earlier age at diagnosis and male predominance, tend to exhibit a lower biochemical remission rate compared to GH positive tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12447,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Endocrinology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1571598"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12104045/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2025.1571598","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Acromegaly is caused by somatotroph tumors. Recently, the WHO recommended the use of transcription factors (TFs) together with pituitary hormones to accurately classify the subtypes.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate differences in the clinical and prognostic characteristics of acromegaly patients with different pathological types.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 94 acromegaly patients who underwent surgical treatment. Patients were classified into two groups on the basis of TFs expression by IHC. PIT1 tumors were positive only for PIT1, and PIT1/SF1 tumors were positive for both PIT1 and SF1. Additionally, on the basis of the expression of GH and PRL by IHC, PIT1 tumors were further subdivided into GH positive tumors (those positive for only GH) and GH/PRL positive tumors (those positive for both GH and PRL). Differences in clinical and prognostic features among the pathological groups were evaluated.

Results: PIT1/SF1 tumors represented 30.9% (n = 29) of the acromegaly patients in this cohort. PIT1/SF1 tumors had a higher baseline IGF-1 index (2.77 ± 0.73 vs. 2.39 ± 0.74, P = 0.024) than PIT1 tumors. Despite the higher proportion of postoperative GH < 1 μg/L, the biochemical remission rate of PIT1/SF1 tumors (30.8% vs. 27.6%, P = 0.812) was similar to that of PIT1 tumors. Compared with those with GH positive tumors, patients with GH/PRL positive tumors were younger at diagnosis (42.50 ± 13.36 vs. 49.05 ± 11.69, P = 0.046), and the proportion of male patients was higher (50.0% vs. 23.3%, P = 0.048). Furthermore, patients with GH/PRL positive tumors had a significantly higher postoperative GH level [7.30 (3.18-11.08) vs. 2.49 (1.57-6.84), P = 0.011] and IGF-1 index (1.82 ± 0.94 vs. 1.31 ± 0.63, P = 0.011) during follow-up. The biochemical remission rate in GH/PRL positive tumors was lower, but the difference was not statistically significant (18.2% vs. 37.2%, P = 0.159).

Conclusion: PIT1/SF1 tumors represent approximately 30.0% of acromegaly patients. Despite higher baseline IGF-1 levels, the clinical and prognostic features of patients with PIT1/SF1 tumors are similar to those of patients with PIT1 tumors. GH/PRL positive tumors, characterized by their earlier age at diagnosis and male predominance, tend to exhibit a lower biochemical remission rate compared to GH positive tumors.

不同病理类型肢端肥大症患者的临床及预后比较。
背景:肢端肥大症是由生长发育性肿瘤引起的。最近,世界卫生组织推荐使用转录因子(tf)和垂体激素来准确分类亚型。目的:探讨不同病理类型肢端肥大症患者临床及预后的差异。方法:对94例手术治疗的肢端肥大症患者进行回顾性分析。根据免疫组化法将患者分为两组。PIT1肿瘤仅PIT1阳性,PIT1/SF1肿瘤PIT1和SF1均阳性。此外,基于IHC对GH和PRL的表达,将PIT1肿瘤进一步细分为GH阳性肿瘤(仅GH阳性)和GH/PRL阳性肿瘤(GH和PRL均阳性)。评估病理组间临床及预后特征的差异。结果:PIT1/SF1肿瘤占该队列肢端肥大症患者的30.9% (n = 29)。PIT1/SF1肿瘤的基线IGF-1指数(2.77±0.73 vs 2.39±0.74,P = 0.024)高于PIT1肿瘤。尽管术后GH < 1 μg/L的比例更高,但PIT1/SF1肿瘤的生化缓解率(30.8% vs. 27.6%, P = 0.812)与PIT1肿瘤相似。与GH阳性肿瘤患者相比,GH/PRL阳性肿瘤患者在诊断时更年轻(42.50±13.36比49.05±11.69,P = 0.046),男性患者所占比例更高(50.0%比23.3%,P = 0.048)。此外,GH/PRL阳性肿瘤患者术后GH水平(7.30(3.18-11.08)比2.49 (1.57-6.84),P = 0.011)和IGF-1指数(1.82±0.94比1.31±0.63,P = 0.011)均显著高于对照组。GH/PRL阳性肿瘤的生化缓解率较低,但差异无统计学意义(18.2%比37.2%,P = 0.159)。结论:PIT1/SF1肿瘤约占肢端肥大症患者的30.0%。尽管IGF-1基线水平较高,但PIT1/SF1肿瘤患者的临床和预后特征与PIT1肿瘤患者相似。与GH阳性肿瘤相比,GH/PRL阳性肿瘤的特点是诊断年龄较早,男性居多,其生化缓解率往往较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Frontiers in Endocrinology Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.60%
发文量
3023
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Endocrinology is a field journal of the "Frontiers in" journal series. In today’s world, endocrinology is becoming increasingly important as it underlies many of the challenges societies face - from obesity and diabetes to reproduction, population control and aging. Endocrinology covers a broad field from basic molecular and cellular communication through to clinical care and some of the most crucial public health issues. The journal, thus, welcomes outstanding contributions in any domain of endocrinology. Frontiers in Endocrinology publishes articles on the most outstanding discoveries across a wide research spectrum of Endocrinology. The mission of Frontiers in Endocrinology is to bring all relevant Endocrinology areas together on a single platform.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信