The efficiency of tactile discrimination training and oculomotor exercises in people with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Kübra Canlı, Gökhan Demirkıran, Filiz Can
{"title":"The efficiency of tactile discrimination training and oculomotor exercises in people with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Kübra Canlı, Gökhan Demirkıran, Filiz Can","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08755-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tactile discrimination training (TDT) and oculomotor exercises (OEs) have been widely used somatosensory-based interventions for a wide range of chronic pain conditions. There is, however, little evidence for the effectiveness of these approaches in people with chronic neck pain. This study aimed to determine the superiority of one intervention over another on pain outcomes in people with chronic neck pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty seven participants were randomly divided into three groups: TDT, OEs, and a control group who received no intervention. TDT, OEs groups received either TDT or OEs, respectively, three times per week for four weeks. The control group received no intervention. Pain intensity, neck pain-related disability, pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), mechanical pain of temporal summation (mTSP), and conditioned pain modulation were assessed as pain outcomes. Depending on the normality, a repeated measures ANOVA or F1-LD-F1 design was used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant group*time interaction and main effects for time were found for pain intensity (p: 0.001, p: 0.001, respectively) and pain-related disability (p < 0.019, p < 0.009; respectively). There was a significant main effect for time for mTSP at the painful side of the neck (p: 0.022). TDT and OEs resulted in a significantly higher improvement in pain intensity (p: 0.005, p < 0.001; respectively) and neck pain-related disability (p: 0.005, p: 0.007; respectively). There was a higher improvement in pain intensity in OEs group compared to TDT group (p: 0.010). A significantly higher improvement in PPT at the painful site after OEs was found (p: 0.038). The control group demonstrated a significantly higher improvement in mTSP in the painful area of the neck (p: 0.048). There were no other significant within- or between-group changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OEs and TDT are effective somatosensory-based interventions for improving pain intensity and pain-related disability.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This study demonstrated that sensory retraining interventions improves the subjective pain perception.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Trial Registration Number: NCT05605132, Date of trial registration: 10/29/2022, Name of trial registry: Neck Pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"519"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08755-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tactile discrimination training (TDT) and oculomotor exercises (OEs) have been widely used somatosensory-based interventions for a wide range of chronic pain conditions. There is, however, little evidence for the effectiveness of these approaches in people with chronic neck pain. This study aimed to determine the superiority of one intervention over another on pain outcomes in people with chronic neck pain.

Methods: Fifty seven participants were randomly divided into three groups: TDT, OEs, and a control group who received no intervention. TDT, OEs groups received either TDT or OEs, respectively, three times per week for four weeks. The control group received no intervention. Pain intensity, neck pain-related disability, pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), mechanical pain of temporal summation (mTSP), and conditioned pain modulation were assessed as pain outcomes. Depending on the normality, a repeated measures ANOVA or F1-LD-F1 design was used to analyse the data.

Results: A significant group*time interaction and main effects for time were found for pain intensity (p: 0.001, p: 0.001, respectively) and pain-related disability (p < 0.019, p < 0.009; respectively). There was a significant main effect for time for mTSP at the painful side of the neck (p: 0.022). TDT and OEs resulted in a significantly higher improvement in pain intensity (p: 0.005, p < 0.001; respectively) and neck pain-related disability (p: 0.005, p: 0.007; respectively). There was a higher improvement in pain intensity in OEs group compared to TDT group (p: 0.010). A significantly higher improvement in PPT at the painful site after OEs was found (p: 0.038). The control group demonstrated a significantly higher improvement in mTSP in the painful area of the neck (p: 0.048). There were no other significant within- or between-group changes.

Conclusion: OEs and TDT are effective somatosensory-based interventions for improving pain intensity and pain-related disability.

Impact: This study demonstrated that sensory retraining interventions improves the subjective pain perception.

Trial registration: Trial Registration Number: NCT05605132, Date of trial registration: 10/29/2022, Name of trial registry: Neck Pain.

触觉辨别训练和动眼肌运动训练对慢性颈部疼痛患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
背景:触觉辨别训练(TDT)和动眼肌运动训练(OEs)已被广泛应用于基于体感觉的慢性疼痛干预。然而,几乎没有证据表明这些方法对慢性颈部疼痛患者有效。本研究旨在确定一种干预措施对慢性颈部疼痛患者疼痛结局的优越性。方法:57名受试者随机分为三组:TDT组、OEs组和不进行干预的对照组。TDT组、OEs组分别接受TDT组或OEs组,每周3次,连续4周。对照组不进行干预。评估疼痛强度、颈部疼痛相关残疾、压力疼痛阈值(PPTs)、机械颞部累积疼痛(mTSP)和条件性疼痛调节作为疼痛结局。根据正态性,使用重复测量方差分析或F1-LD-F1设计来分析数据。结果:疼痛强度(p: 0.001, p: 0.001)和疼痛相关功能障碍(p: 0.001)存在显著的组*时间交互作用和时间的主要效应。结论:OEs和TDT是有效的躯体感觉干预,可改善疼痛强度和疼痛相关功能障碍。影响:本研究表明,感觉再训练干预可以改善主观疼痛感知。试验注册:试验注册号:NCT05605132,试验注册日期:10/29/2022,试验注册名称:颈部疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信