Benefits of laparoscopic approach in early-stage ovarian cancer and ovarian masses.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Current Opinion in Oncology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI:10.1097/CCO.0000000000001159
María Alonso-Espías, Myriam Gracia, Ignacio Zapardiel
{"title":"Benefits of laparoscopic approach in early-stage ovarian cancer and ovarian masses.","authors":"María Alonso-Espías, Myriam Gracia, Ignacio Zapardiel","doi":"10.1097/CCO.0000000000001159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The aim of this review is to summarize the available evidence on the use and benefits of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the management of ovarian masses and early-stage ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>MIS did not negatively impact survival outcomes or increase perioperative complication rates in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer compared to open surgery, while providing the inherent benefits associated with this surgical approach. Regarding the type of MIS, both laparoscopic and robotic approaches can be used in well selected patients at specialized centers.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>MIS appears to be a feasible and well tolerated surgical option for the evaluation of ovarian masses and for the comprehensive staging of early-stage ovarian cancer patients. Compared to open surgery, MIS offers several advantages, including significantly reduced blood loss, a lower need for transfusion, shorter hospital stays and faster postoperative recovery, without compromising surgical results. Furthermore, extensive retrospective studies have shown comparable survival outcomes between both approaches. However, high-quality evidence from randomized clinical trials is still needed to establish definitive conclusions and draw international recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10893,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"470-477"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The aim of this review is to summarize the available evidence on the use and benefits of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the management of ovarian masses and early-stage ovarian cancer.

Recent findings: MIS did not negatively impact survival outcomes or increase perioperative complication rates in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer compared to open surgery, while providing the inherent benefits associated with this surgical approach. Regarding the type of MIS, both laparoscopic and robotic approaches can be used in well selected patients at specialized centers.

Summary: MIS appears to be a feasible and well tolerated surgical option for the evaluation of ovarian masses and for the comprehensive staging of early-stage ovarian cancer patients. Compared to open surgery, MIS offers several advantages, including significantly reduced blood loss, a lower need for transfusion, shorter hospital stays and faster postoperative recovery, without compromising surgical results. Furthermore, extensive retrospective studies have shown comparable survival outcomes between both approaches. However, high-quality evidence from randomized clinical trials is still needed to establish definitive conclusions and draw international recommendations.

腹腔镜入路治疗早期卵巢癌和卵巢肿块的益处。
综述目的:本综述的目的是总结微创手术(MIS)在卵巢肿块和早期卵巢癌治疗中的应用和益处的现有证据。最近的研究发现:与开放手术相比,MIS对早期卵巢癌患者的生存结果没有负面影响,也没有增加围手术期并发症的发生率,同时提供了与该手术方法相关的固有益处。关于MIS的类型,腹腔镜和机器人方法都可以在专业中心用于精心挑选的患者。摘要:MIS似乎是评估卵巢肿块和早期卵巢癌患者综合分期的一种可行且耐受性良好的手术选择。与开放手术相比,MIS具有几个优势,包括显著减少失血量、更少的输血需求、更短的住院时间和更快的术后恢复,而不会影响手术效果。此外,广泛的回顾性研究表明,两种方法之间的生存结果相当。然而,仍然需要来自随机临床试验的高质量证据来建立明确的结论并提出国际建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Oncology
Current Opinion in Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With its easy-to-digest reviews on important advances in world literature, Current Opinion in Oncology offers expert evaluation on a wide range of topics from sixteen key disciplines including sarcomas, cancer biology, melanoma and endocrine tumors. Published bimonthly, each issue covers in detail the most pertinent advances in these fields from the previous year. This is supplemented by annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信