Technology Acceptance and Usability of a Therapy System with a Humanoid Robot Serving as Therapeutic Assistant for Post-Stroke Arm and Neurovisual Rehabilitation-An Evaluation Based on Stroke Survivors' Experience.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Thomas Platz, Alexandru-Nicolae Umlauft, Ann Louise Pedersen, Peter Forbrig
{"title":"Technology Acceptance and Usability of a Therapy System with a Humanoid Robot Serving as Therapeutic Assistant for Post-Stroke Arm and Neurovisual Rehabilitation-An Evaluation Based on Stroke Survivors' Experience.","authors":"Thomas Platz, Alexandru-Nicolae Umlauft, Ann Louise Pedersen, Peter Forbrig","doi":"10.3390/biomimetics10050289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This study performed an evaluation of technology acceptance of the therapeutic system E-BRAiN (Evidence-Based Robot Assistance in Neurorehabilitation) by stroke survivors receiving therapy with the system. <b>Methods:</b> The evaluation was based on a 49-item questionnaire addressing technology acceptance (I) with its constituents, i.e., perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived adaptability, perceived enjoyment, attitude, trust, anxiety, social influence, perceived sociability, and social presence (41 items), and (II) more general items exploring user experience in terms of both technology acceptance (3 items) and usability (5 open-question items). <b>Results:</b> Eleven consecutive sub-acute stroke survivors who had received either arm rehabilitation sessions (n = 5) or neglect therapy (n = 6) led by a humanoid robot participated. The multidimensional \"strength of acceptance\" summary statistic (Part I) indicates a high degree of technology acceptance (mean, 4.0; 95% CI, 3.7 to 4.3), as does the \"general acceptance\" summary statistic (mean, 4.1; 95% CI, 3.3 to 4.9) (art II) (scores ranging from 1, lowest degree of acceptance, to 5, highest degree of acceptance, with a score of 3 as neutral experience anchor). Positive ratings were also documented for all assessed constituents (Part I), as well as the perception that it makes sense to use the robot technology for stroke therapy and as a supplement for users' own therapy (Part II). <b>Conclusions:</b> A high degree of technology acceptance and its constituents, i.e., perceived functionality and social behaviour of the humanoid robot and own emotions while using the system, could be corroborated among stroke survivors who used the therapeutic system E-BRAiN.</p>","PeriodicalId":8907,"journal":{"name":"Biomimetics","volume":"10 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12108900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomimetics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10050289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study performed an evaluation of technology acceptance of the therapeutic system E-BRAiN (Evidence-Based Robot Assistance in Neurorehabilitation) by stroke survivors receiving therapy with the system. Methods: The evaluation was based on a 49-item questionnaire addressing technology acceptance (I) with its constituents, i.e., perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived adaptability, perceived enjoyment, attitude, trust, anxiety, social influence, perceived sociability, and social presence (41 items), and (II) more general items exploring user experience in terms of both technology acceptance (3 items) and usability (5 open-question items). Results: Eleven consecutive sub-acute stroke survivors who had received either arm rehabilitation sessions (n = 5) or neglect therapy (n = 6) led by a humanoid robot participated. The multidimensional "strength of acceptance" summary statistic (Part I) indicates a high degree of technology acceptance (mean, 4.0; 95% CI, 3.7 to 4.3), as does the "general acceptance" summary statistic (mean, 4.1; 95% CI, 3.3 to 4.9) (art II) (scores ranging from 1, lowest degree of acceptance, to 5, highest degree of acceptance, with a score of 3 as neutral experience anchor). Positive ratings were also documented for all assessed constituents (Part I), as well as the perception that it makes sense to use the robot technology for stroke therapy and as a supplement for users' own therapy (Part II). Conclusions: A high degree of technology acceptance and its constituents, i.e., perceived functionality and social behaviour of the humanoid robot and own emotions while using the system, could be corroborated among stroke survivors who used the therapeutic system E-BRAiN.

基于脑卒中幸存者经验的类人机器人辅助脑卒中后手臂和神经视觉康复治疗系统的技术接受度和可用性评估
背景:本研究对接受E-BRAiN(循证机器人辅助神经康复)治疗系统的中风幸存者的技术接受度进行了评估。方法:采用一份包含49个项目的技术接受度问卷,其中包括感知有用性、感知易用性、感知适应性、感知享受、态度、信任、焦虑、社会影响力、感知社交性和社会存在(41个项目),以及(II)更一般的项目,从技术接受度(3个项目)和可用性(5个开放性问题项目)两方面探索用户体验。结果:11名连续接受了手臂康复治疗(n = 5)或忽视治疗(n = 6)的亚急性中风幸存者参加了由人形机器人领导的康复治疗。多维度“接受强度”汇总统计(第一部分)表明技术接受程度较高(平均值,4.0;95% CI, 3.7至4.3),“一般接受”汇总统计量(平均值,4.1;95% CI, 3.3至4.9)(第II条)(得分范围从1分,最低接受度,到5分,最高接受度,得分为3分作为中立经验锚)。对所有评估成分的积极评价也被记录下来(第一部分),以及将机器人技术用于中风治疗和作为用户自己治疗的补充是有意义的(第二部分)。结论:在使用E-BRAiN治疗系统的中风幸存者中,可以证实其高度的技术接受度及其组成部分,即在使用该系统时感知到的类人机器人的功能和社会行为以及自己的情绪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomimetics
Biomimetics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信