Enhancing laparoscopic visibility: efficient surgical smoke clearance innovatively using nebulization technology.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Xiaosong Lin, Qiming Fan, Renjie Li, Ruijian Chen, Zifeng Yang, Yong Li
{"title":"Enhancing laparoscopic visibility: efficient surgical smoke clearance innovatively using nebulization technology.","authors":"Xiaosong Lin, Qiming Fan, Renjie Li, Ruijian Chen, Zifeng Yang, Yong Li","doi":"10.1186/s12938-025-01395-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Particulate matter (PM) in surgical smoke is known to influence operative vision and poses safety risks to operating personnel. Nebulization, which is effective in promoting the deposition of PM, has not been used to clear laparoscopic surgical smoke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The novel nebulizer was tested for mechanical characteristics and applied to evaluate its feasibility for surgical smoke clearance. Nebulization (n = 6) or elimination (n = 6) procedures were performed to manage surgical smoke produced by electrocautery hook or ultrasonic scalpel on various tissues of twelve rabbits. Levels of PM in surgical smoke, including the PM1.0, PM2.5, PM10, and total suspended particulate were compared to evaluate emissions from both surgical instruments. In addition, pre-treatment, post-treatment and reduction in PM concentrations were compared between the nebulization and elimination groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The spray cone angle was approximately 70°, and the median particle size was around 25 µm. Laparoscopic visibility was restored with clearance of surgical smoke within 8 s after nebulization. The electrocautery hook produced significantly higher levels of PM compared to the ultrasonic scalpel. The PM concentrations generated by electrocautery hook varied across different tissues, whereas only PM1.0 level differed with the ultrasonic scalpel. The pre-treatment PM concentrations were comparable between both groups. The nebulization group showed a greater reduction in PM concentrations compared to the elimination group, with statistical significance in PM1.0 levels. Consequently, post-treatment PM concentrations were significantly lower in the nebulization group. Similar trends were observed across all target tissues except for omentum.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nebulization was an effective method for clearing laparoscopic surgical smoke thereby improving surgical vision and potentially mitigating risks associated with surgical smoke exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":8927,"journal":{"name":"BioMedical Engineering OnLine","volume":"24 1","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12105325/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMedical Engineering OnLine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-025-01395-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Particulate matter (PM) in surgical smoke is known to influence operative vision and poses safety risks to operating personnel. Nebulization, which is effective in promoting the deposition of PM, has not been used to clear laparoscopic surgical smoke.

Methods: The novel nebulizer was tested for mechanical characteristics and applied to evaluate its feasibility for surgical smoke clearance. Nebulization (n = 6) or elimination (n = 6) procedures were performed to manage surgical smoke produced by electrocautery hook or ultrasonic scalpel on various tissues of twelve rabbits. Levels of PM in surgical smoke, including the PM1.0, PM2.5, PM10, and total suspended particulate were compared to evaluate emissions from both surgical instruments. In addition, pre-treatment, post-treatment and reduction in PM concentrations were compared between the nebulization and elimination groups.

Results: The spray cone angle was approximately 70°, and the median particle size was around 25 µm. Laparoscopic visibility was restored with clearance of surgical smoke within 8 s after nebulization. The electrocautery hook produced significantly higher levels of PM compared to the ultrasonic scalpel. The PM concentrations generated by electrocautery hook varied across different tissues, whereas only PM1.0 level differed with the ultrasonic scalpel. The pre-treatment PM concentrations were comparable between both groups. The nebulization group showed a greater reduction in PM concentrations compared to the elimination group, with statistical significance in PM1.0 levels. Consequently, post-treatment PM concentrations were significantly lower in the nebulization group. Similar trends were observed across all target tissues except for omentum.

Conclusions: Nebulization was an effective method for clearing laparoscopic surgical smoke thereby improving surgical vision and potentially mitigating risks associated with surgical smoke exposure.

提高腹腔镜能见度:创新地使用雾化技术进行高效手术排烟。
背景:已知手术烟雾中的颗粒物(PM)会影响手术视力并对手术人员构成安全风险。雾化,这是有效的促进沉积PM,尚未用于清除腹腔镜手术烟雾。方法:对新型雾化器进行力学性能测试,并评价其在手术清烟中的可行性。采用雾化(n = 6)或消除(n = 6)方法对12只家兔的不同组织进行电灼钩或超声刀手术产生的烟雾处理。比较手术烟雾中的PM水平,包括PM1.0、PM2.5、PM10和总悬浮颗粒物,以评估两种手术器械的排放。此外,还比较了雾化组和消除组处理前、处理后和PM浓度降低情况。结果:喷雾锥角约为70°,中位粒径约为25µm。雾化后8 s内手术烟雾清除,腹腔镜下视力恢复。与超声波手术刀相比,电灼钩产生的PM水平明显更高。电灼钩产生的PM浓度在不同组织间存在差异,而超声手术刀产生的PM1.0水平存在差异。两组间预处理前PM浓度具有可比性。雾化组PM浓度较消除组降低幅度更大,PM1.0水平差异有统计学意义。因此,雾化组治疗后PM浓度显著降低。除网膜外,所有靶组织均观察到类似的趋势。结论:雾化是清除腹腔镜手术烟雾的有效方法,从而改善手术视力,并可能减轻手术烟雾暴露相关的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BioMedical Engineering OnLine
BioMedical Engineering OnLine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
79
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BioMedical Engineering OnLine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that is dedicated to publishing research in all areas of biomedical engineering. BioMedical Engineering OnLine is aimed at readers and authors throughout the world, with an interest in using tools of the physical and data sciences and techniques in engineering to understand and solve problems in the biological and medical sciences. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: Bioinformatics- Bioinstrumentation- Biomechanics- Biomedical Devices & Instrumentation- Biomedical Signal Processing- Healthcare Information Systems- Human Dynamics- Neural Engineering- Rehabilitation Engineering- Biomaterials- Biomedical Imaging & Image Processing- BioMEMS and On-Chip Devices- Bio-Micro/Nano Technologies- Biomolecular Engineering- Biosensors- Cardiovascular Systems Engineering- Cellular Engineering- Clinical Engineering- Computational Biology- Drug Delivery Technologies- Modeling Methodologies- Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology in Biomedicine- Respiratory Systems Engineering- Robotics in Medicine- Systems and Synthetic Biology- Systems Biology- Telemedicine/Smartphone Applications in Medicine- Therapeutic Systems, Devices and Technologies- Tissue Engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信