Value-based evaluation of gestational diabetes mellitus care pathway redesign by using cost and outcome data.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Maud van den Berg, Julia Spaan, Jacoba van der Kooy, Monique Klerkx, Charlotte Krol, Arie Franx, Kees T B Ahaus, Hilco J van Elten
{"title":"Value-based evaluation of gestational diabetes mellitus care pathway redesign by using cost and outcome data.","authors":"Maud van den Berg, Julia Spaan, Jacoba van der Kooy, Monique Klerkx, Charlotte Krol, Arie Franx, Kees T B Ahaus, Hilco J van Elten","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07576-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common complication of pregnancy. Implementation of Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) to GDM care is worthwhile as traditional GDM care is fragmented and fails to meet the needs of women with GDM. Value of care can be improved through optimization and redesign of the care pathway and implementation of an outcome-based payment model. This study was conducted to perform a value-based evaluation of GDM care pathway redesign by using cost- and outcome data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was designed as a single center, prospective, observational cohort study. In January 2022, GDM care was redesigned by substituting GDM care activities from an Internal Medicine Department (IMD) to an Integrated Maternity Care Organization (IMCO) in the Netherlands. Women diagnosed with GDM in 2021 were assigned to a pre-intervention cohort (N = 264) and those diagnosed in 2022 to a post-intervention cohort (N = 407). The impact of the intervention on value of care for women with GDM was evaluated by comparing clinical outcomes, patient-reported experience measures (GDM Responsiveness questionnaire), and costs (Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing) between the cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Referrals to the IMD for GDM decreased by 84.8% (pre-intervention: 100%, post-intervention: 15.2%, p <.001), patient-reported experiences significantly improved (Mean responsiveness pre-intervention: 3.46, post-intervention: 3.63, p: 0.00). Initiation of insulin treatment decreased by 46.8% (pre-intervention: 25.0%, post-intervention: 13.3%, p <.001). Maternal- and neonatal clinical outcomes were not different after redesign. Weighted average costs per GDM treatment were 9.7% lower post-intervention (pre-intervention: €168,37, post-intervention: €151,97).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The redesign of GDM care positively impacted value through decreased referrals and improved patient-reported experiences while clinical outcomes remained constant. By de-fragmenting GDM care, cost savings were realized. This study contributes to the improvement of care delivery, particularly in pregnancy and childbirth, by promoting the adoption of comprehensive, value-based evaluations of redesign initiatives and supports the further uptake of VBHC in maternity care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"608"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12105306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07576-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common complication of pregnancy. Implementation of Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) to GDM care is worthwhile as traditional GDM care is fragmented and fails to meet the needs of women with GDM. Value of care can be improved through optimization and redesign of the care pathway and implementation of an outcome-based payment model. This study was conducted to perform a value-based evaluation of GDM care pathway redesign by using cost- and outcome data.

Methods: This study was designed as a single center, prospective, observational cohort study. In January 2022, GDM care was redesigned by substituting GDM care activities from an Internal Medicine Department (IMD) to an Integrated Maternity Care Organization (IMCO) in the Netherlands. Women diagnosed with GDM in 2021 were assigned to a pre-intervention cohort (N = 264) and those diagnosed in 2022 to a post-intervention cohort (N = 407). The impact of the intervention on value of care for women with GDM was evaluated by comparing clinical outcomes, patient-reported experience measures (GDM Responsiveness questionnaire), and costs (Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing) between the cohorts.

Results: Referrals to the IMD for GDM decreased by 84.8% (pre-intervention: 100%, post-intervention: 15.2%, p <.001), patient-reported experiences significantly improved (Mean responsiveness pre-intervention: 3.46, post-intervention: 3.63, p: 0.00). Initiation of insulin treatment decreased by 46.8% (pre-intervention: 25.0%, post-intervention: 13.3%, p <.001). Maternal- and neonatal clinical outcomes were not different after redesign. Weighted average costs per GDM treatment were 9.7% lower post-intervention (pre-intervention: €168,37, post-intervention: €151,97).

Conclusions: The redesign of GDM care positively impacted value through decreased referrals and improved patient-reported experiences while clinical outcomes remained constant. By de-fragmenting GDM care, cost savings were realized. This study contributes to the improvement of care delivery, particularly in pregnancy and childbirth, by promoting the adoption of comprehensive, value-based evaluations of redesign initiatives and supports the further uptake of VBHC in maternity care.

利用成本和结局数据对妊娠期糖尿病护理路径重新设计的价值评价。
背景:妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)是妊娠期常见的并发症。在GDM护理中实施基于价值的医疗保健(VBHC)是值得的,因为传统的GDM护理是分散的,不能满足GDM妇女的需求。通过优化和重新设计护理途径以及实施基于结果的支付模式,可以提高护理的价值。本研究旨在通过使用成本和结果数据,对GDM护理路径重新设计进行基于价值的评估。方法:本研究采用单中心、前瞻性、观察性队列研究。2022年1月,荷兰通过将GDM护理活动从内科(IMD)替换为综合产科护理组织(IMCO),重新设计了GDM护理。2021年诊断为GDM的女性被分配到干预前队列(N = 264), 2022年诊断为GDM的女性被分配到干预后队列(N = 407)。通过比较临床结果、患者报告的经验测量(GDM反应性问卷)和成本(时间驱动的基于活动的成本计算)来评估干预对GDM妇女护理价值的影响。结果:GDM的转诊减少了84.8%(干预前:100%,干预后:15.2%)。结论:GDM护理的重新设计通过减少转诊和改善患者报告的体验而对价值产生积极影响,而临床结果保持不变。通过拆分GDM护理,实现了成本节约。这项研究有助于改善护理服务,特别是在怀孕和分娩,通过促进采用全面的,以价值为基础的评估重新设计的举措,并支持在产妇护理中进一步采用VBHC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信