The uncertainties and questions of care home residents, relatives and staff as a basis for evidence-based improvement and research.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Reena Devi, Kirsty Jayne Haunch, Elizabeth Helen Graham, Alys Wyn Griffiths, Gary Hodge, Andrew Clegg, Maria Drummond, Anne Forster, Susie Pearce, Karen Spilsbury, Carl Thompson
{"title":"The uncertainties and questions of care home residents, relatives and staff as a basis for evidence-based improvement and research.","authors":"Reena Devi, Kirsty Jayne Haunch, Elizabeth Helen Graham, Alys Wyn Griffiths, Gary Hodge, Andrew Clegg, Maria Drummond, Anne Forster, Susie Pearce, Karen Spilsbury, Carl Thompson","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research in long-term residential care settings (or care homes) for older people should address questions and uncertainties that matter most for those receiving and delivering care. Whether research does this effectively is unclear. In part, because the uncertainties and questions of key stakeholders are unmapped.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To capture and prioritise the uncertainties of older people living in care homes, their relatives and staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-phase mixed-methods study: (i) gathering uncertainties, (ii) data analysis and (iii) prioritisation. Phase 1 used interviews to gather uncertainties from residents (n = 14), relatives (n = 10) and staff (n = 44). In phase 2, uncertainties were coded using thematic inductive analysis, represented as 'foreground' (necessitating research) or 'background' (not needing research) questions, and a prioritisation tool developed. The tool included optional open-text responses, capturing new questions fitting (and additional detail around) the existing subthemes. During phase 3, the prioritisation tool was completed by residents (n = 95), relatives (n = 85) and staff (n = 158).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>319 uncertainties were identified: 274 foreground (research-based) and 45 background (fact-based) questions. Six broad and 38 subthemes were developed. Broad themes included (i) communal living, (ii) health and care services, (iii) resident care, (iv) residents' health and well-being, (v) residents' daily life and (vi) care home staff. Priority subthemes included enjoy living with others, dignity and respect, support with emotions, meaningful activities, and staff recruitment and retention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study of care home prioritised uncertainties informed by residents, relatives and staff. The uncertainty-based questions represent important targets for care home research and practice improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"54 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf125","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research in long-term residential care settings (or care homes) for older people should address questions and uncertainties that matter most for those receiving and delivering care. Whether research does this effectively is unclear. In part, because the uncertainties and questions of key stakeholders are unmapped.

Objective: To capture and prioritise the uncertainties of older people living in care homes, their relatives and staff.

Methods: A three-phase mixed-methods study: (i) gathering uncertainties, (ii) data analysis and (iii) prioritisation. Phase 1 used interviews to gather uncertainties from residents (n = 14), relatives (n = 10) and staff (n = 44). In phase 2, uncertainties were coded using thematic inductive analysis, represented as 'foreground' (necessitating research) or 'background' (not needing research) questions, and a prioritisation tool developed. The tool included optional open-text responses, capturing new questions fitting (and additional detail around) the existing subthemes. During phase 3, the prioritisation tool was completed by residents (n = 95), relatives (n = 85) and staff (n = 158).

Results: 319 uncertainties were identified: 274 foreground (research-based) and 45 background (fact-based) questions. Six broad and 38 subthemes were developed. Broad themes included (i) communal living, (ii) health and care services, (iii) resident care, (iv) residents' health and well-being, (v) residents' daily life and (vi) care home staff. Priority subthemes included enjoy living with others, dignity and respect, support with emotions, meaningful activities, and staff recruitment and retention.

Conclusion: This is the first study of care home prioritised uncertainties informed by residents, relatives and staff. The uncertainty-based questions represent important targets for care home research and practice improvement.

养老院居民、亲属和工作人员的不确定性和问题,作为循证改进和研究的基础。
背景:对老年人长期住宿护理机构(或养老院)的研究应该解决对接受和提供护理的人最重要的问题和不确定性。研究是否能有效地做到这一点尚不清楚。部分原因是关键利益相关者的不确定性和问题没有被映射出来。目的:捕捉和优先考虑老年人生活在养老院,他们的亲属和工作人员的不确定性。方法:三阶段混合方法研究:(i)收集不确定性,(ii)数据分析,(iii)优先排序。第一阶段通过访谈收集居民(n = 14)、亲属(n = 10)和工作人员(n = 44)的不确定性。在第二阶段,使用主题归纳分析对不确定性进行编码,表示为“前景”(需要研究)或“背景”(不需要研究)问题,并开发了优先排序工具。该工具包括可选的开放文本回答,捕获适合现有子主题的新问题(以及其他细节)。在第三阶段,居民(n = 95)、亲属(n = 85)和工作人员(n = 158)完成了优先排序工具。结果:确定了319个不确定因素:274个前景问题(基于研究)和45个背景问题(基于事实)。拟定了6个大主题和38个分主题。广泛的主题包括:(i)公共生活,(ii)健康和护理服务,(iii)住院护理,(iv)居民的健康和福祉,(v)居民的日常生活和(vi)养老院工作人员。优先分主题包括享受与他人一起生活、尊严和尊重、情感支持、有意义的活动以及工作人员的征聘和保留。结论:本研究首次对养老院居民、家属和工作人员告知的优先不确定因素进行了研究。基于不确定性的问题是养老院研究和实践改进的重要目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信