Comparison of the Effect of SAMPE and ALDERTE Checklists on the Incidence of Complications After Discharge of Radical Prostatectomy Patients from the Post-anesthesia Care Unit (PACU).

Q2 Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-15 eCollection Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.5812/aapm-156738
Alireza Zareie, Parisa Moradimajd, Azam Saei, Jamileh Abolghasemi
{"title":"Comparison of the Effect of SAMPE and ALDERTE Checklists on the Incidence of Complications After Discharge of Radical Prostatectomy Patients from the Post-anesthesia Care Unit (PACU).","authors":"Alireza Zareie, Parisa Moradimajd, Azam Saei, Jamileh Abolghasemi","doi":"10.5812/aapm-156738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Among the available tools, the SAMPE and ALDERTE checklists have been specifically designed to facilitate timely patient discharge, minimize human error, and optimize resource utilization. Given the complexities associated with surgical care, a comparative analysis of these two checklists is essential to evaluate their efficacy in improving discharge outcomes and preventing complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study assessed the distribution of complications following radical prostatectomy surgery by utilizing the SAMPE and ALDERTE checklists for discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). A total of 156 participants, divided into three groups of 52 individuals each, were monitored for post-discharge complications 12 hours after their discharge from the PACU across three training centers. This methodology enabled a thorough evaluation of the roles of both checklists in mitigating adverse events during the critical post-operative period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in complication rates were observed among the groups; however, bleeding and vomiting were slightly more common in the SAMPE group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study concluded that neither the SAMPE nor the ALDERTE checklist provided a distinct advantage over the control group, which comprised patients routinely discharged from the same treatment center. Both checklists demonstrated similar functionalities, with each showing relative strengths in specific aspects; however, neither was found to be universally superior to the other.</p>","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":"e156738"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-156738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Among the available tools, the SAMPE and ALDERTE checklists have been specifically designed to facilitate timely patient discharge, minimize human error, and optimize resource utilization. Given the complexities associated with surgical care, a comparative analysis of these two checklists is essential to evaluate their efficacy in improving discharge outcomes and preventing complications.

Methods: This descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study assessed the distribution of complications following radical prostatectomy surgery by utilizing the SAMPE and ALDERTE checklists for discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). A total of 156 participants, divided into three groups of 52 individuals each, were monitored for post-discharge complications 12 hours after their discharge from the PACU across three training centers. This methodology enabled a thorough evaluation of the roles of both checklists in mitigating adverse events during the critical post-operative period.

Results: No significant differences in complication rates were observed among the groups; however, bleeding and vomiting were slightly more common in the SAMPE group.

Conclusions: This study concluded that neither the SAMPE nor the ALDERTE checklist provided a distinct advantage over the control group, which comprised patients routinely discharged from the same treatment center. Both checklists demonstrated similar functionalities, with each showing relative strengths in specific aspects; however, neither was found to be universally superior to the other.

SAMPE与ALDERTE检查表对PACU根治性前列腺切除术患者出院后并发症发生率的影响比较
背景:在可用的工具中,SAMPE和ALDERTE检查表是专门设计用于促进患者及时出院,最大限度地减少人为错误和优化资源利用的。鉴于外科护理的复杂性,对这两种检查表进行比较分析对于评估它们在改善出院结果和预防并发症方面的有效性是必要的。方法:本描述性分析横断面研究通过使用SAMPE和ALDERTE检查表评估根治性前列腺切除术后麻醉后护理病房(PACU)出院并发症的分布。共有156名参与者,分为三组,每组52人,在他们从PACU出院12小时后,在三个培训中心对出院后并发症进行监测。该方法能够对两种检查表在减轻术后关键时期不良事件中的作用进行全面评估。结果:两组患者并发症发生率无显著差异;然而,出血和呕吐在SAMPE组中更为常见。结论:本研究得出结论,SAMPE和ALDERTE检查表都没有明显优于对照组,对照组由常规从同一治疗中心出院的患者组成。这两个清单都展示了类似的功能,每个清单都显示了在特定方面的相对优势;然而,没有发现任何一种都比另一种优越。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信