Ultrasonography-Guided Core-Needle Biopsy for Newly Diagnosed Large B-Cell Lymphomas: Analysis on Diagnostic Efficacy and Safety in an Italian Retrospective Study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Marco Picardi, Claudia Giordano, Annamaria Vincenzi, Novella Pugliese, Alessia Scarpa, Massimo Mascolo, Elena Vigliar, Giancarlo Troncone, Claudia Salvatore, Fabrizio Pane
{"title":"Ultrasonography-Guided Core-Needle Biopsy for Newly Diagnosed Large B-Cell Lymphomas: Analysis on Diagnostic Efficacy and Safety in an Italian Retrospective Study.","authors":"Marco Picardi, Claudia Giordano, Annamaria Vincenzi, Novella Pugliese, Alessia Scarpa, Massimo Mascolo, Elena Vigliar, Giancarlo Troncone, Claudia Salvatore, Fabrizio Pane","doi":"10.1159/000544794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Excisional biopsy (EB) is the gold standard for large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs) diagnosis. Based on recent advances in interventional radiology enabling accurate sampling with core needle biopsy (CNB), we evaluated efficacy and safety of CNB under imaging guidance for diagnosing LBCLs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At the Hematology and Pathology Units of the Federico II University Medical School of Naples (Italy), we retrospectively collected patients with lymphadenopathies suspected of lymphomas (during 2009-2022) of which the ultrasonography (US)-guided CNB lymph node samples were available. Subsequently, we investigated the accuracy and safety of US-guided CNB for LBCLs diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a 12-year period, 800 (superficial target, n = 560; deep-seated target, n = 240) lymph node biopsies performed with 16-gauge diameter modified Menghini needle under power-Doppler ultrasonographic guidance have been evaluated in 800 patients. According to the reference standard, 220 were suffering from LBCLs (diffuse LBCL NOS [n = 196], and high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements [n = 24]) subtypes, other malignancy subtypes (n = 510) and non-malignant findings (n = 70). For the series of LBCLs, the overall diagnostic accuracy of the micro-histological sampling was 100% (95% confidence interval: 98%-100%). The complications occurred with very low incidence and severity (grade ≤2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US-guided CNB is a less invasive method and can be considered an alternative to EB for LBCL diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":6981,"journal":{"name":"Acta Haematologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12173430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Haematologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544794","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Excisional biopsy (EB) is the gold standard for large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs) diagnosis. Based on recent advances in interventional radiology enabling accurate sampling with core needle biopsy (CNB), we evaluated efficacy and safety of CNB under imaging guidance for diagnosing LBCLs.

Methods: At the Hematology and Pathology Units of the Federico II University Medical School of Naples (Italy), we retrospectively collected patients with lymphadenopathies suspected of lymphomas (during 2009-2022) of which the ultrasonography (US)-guided CNB lymph node samples were available. Subsequently, we investigated the accuracy and safety of US-guided CNB for LBCLs diagnosis.

Results: Over a 12-year period, 800 (superficial target, n = 560; deep-seated target, n = 240) lymph node biopsies performed with 16-gauge diameter modified Menghini needle under power-Doppler ultrasonographic guidance have been evaluated in 800 patients. According to the reference standard, 220 were suffering from LBCLs (diffuse LBCL NOS [n = 196], and high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements [n = 24]) subtypes, other malignancy subtypes (n = 510) and non-malignant findings (n = 70). For the series of LBCLs, the overall diagnostic accuracy of the micro-histological sampling was 100% (95% confidence interval: 98%-100%). The complications occurred with very low incidence and severity (grade ≤2).

Conclusion: US-guided CNB is a less invasive method and can be considered an alternative to EB for LBCL diagnosis.

超声引导下的芯针活检对新诊断的大b细胞淋巴瘤:意大利回顾性研究的诊断有效性和安全性分析。
导言:切除活检(EB)是大b细胞淋巴瘤(LBCLs)诊断的金标准。基于介入放射学的最新进展,我们评估了核心针活检(CNB)在成像指导下诊断lbcl的有效性和安全性。方法:在那不勒斯(意大利)Federico II大学医学院血液学和病理学单元,我们回顾性收集了2009-2022年期间疑似淋巴瘤的淋巴结病变患者,其中超声(US)引导的CNB淋巴结样本可用。随后,我们研究了us引导CNB诊断lbcl的准确性和安全性。结果:12年期间,800例(表面目标,n = 560;在功率多普勒超声引导下,用直径16号的改良蒙氏针行深部淋巴结活检800例(n = 240)。根据参考标准,220例患者为lbcl(弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤NOS [n = 196], MYC和BCL2重排的高级别b细胞淋巴瘤[n = 24])亚型、其他恶性亚型(n = 510)和非恶性表现(n = 70)。对于lbcl系列,显微组织学取样的总体诊断准确率为100%(95%置信区间:98%-100%)。并发症发生率极低,严重程度≤2级。结论:US-guided CNB是一种侵入性较小的LBCL诊断方法,可以考虑替代EB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Haematologica
Acta Haematologica 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Acta Haematologica'' is a well-established and internationally recognized clinically-oriented journal featuring balanced, wide-ranging coverage of current hematology research. A wealth of information on such problems as anemia, leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, hereditary disorders, blood coagulation, growth factors, hematopoiesis and differentiation is contained in first-rate basic and clinical papers some of which are accompanied by editorial comments by eminent experts. These are supplemented by short state-of-the-art communications, reviews and correspondence as well as occasional special issues devoted to ‘hot topics’ in hematology. These will keep the practicing hematologist well informed of the new developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信