Student Voices From ‘Within’: EDI, Women Students and the University of Cambridge

Sarah Jane Aiston
{"title":"Student Voices From ‘Within’: EDI, Women Students and the University of Cambridge","authors":"Sarah Jane Aiston","doi":"10.1002/dvr2.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A commitment to equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) can be found as a statement on the websites of most UK universities. As women have increasingly entered higher education—comprising more than 50% of the undergraduate student body—a discourse of the feminisation of higher education has been evident in media and policy responses for over a decade. This feminisation thesis assumes that women are not only now in a numerical majority but are also changing the culture of the system. From an EDI perspective, we might therefore assume that in relation to women students, at least, there is little work to be done. There is evidence, however, to query the feminisation thesis. This article contributes to the field by giving attention to the students' ‘voice’ as a valuable equity and inclusion strategy, in addition to exploring how inclusion might be understood within an elite context. Methodologically innovative, this article analyses the student press of the University of Cambridge in the year that sexual consent workshops were introduced. Drawing on the theoretical framework of ‘space’, the article will explore how students use the student press as a ‘space’ within which to draw attention to women students ‘representational’ space and the coupling of particular spaces with specific bodies. The article will argue and present evidence to demonstrate that the critique from ‘within’ challenges notions of equality, diversity and inclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":100379,"journal":{"name":"Diversity & Inclusion Research","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dvr2.70031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity & Inclusion Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dvr2.70031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A commitment to equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) can be found as a statement on the websites of most UK universities. As women have increasingly entered higher education—comprising more than 50% of the undergraduate student body—a discourse of the feminisation of higher education has been evident in media and policy responses for over a decade. This feminisation thesis assumes that women are not only now in a numerical majority but are also changing the culture of the system. From an EDI perspective, we might therefore assume that in relation to women students, at least, there is little work to be done. There is evidence, however, to query the feminisation thesis. This article contributes to the field by giving attention to the students' ‘voice’ as a valuable equity and inclusion strategy, in addition to exploring how inclusion might be understood within an elite context. Methodologically innovative, this article analyses the student press of the University of Cambridge in the year that sexual consent workshops were introduced. Drawing on the theoretical framework of ‘space’, the article will explore how students use the student press as a ‘space’ within which to draw attention to women students ‘representational’ space and the coupling of particular spaces with specific bodies. The article will argue and present evidence to demonstrate that the critique from ‘within’ challenges notions of equality, diversity and inclusion.

来自“内部”的学生声音:EDI,女学生和剑桥大学
在大多数英国大学的网站上都可以找到对平等、多样性和包容性(EDI)的承诺。随着越来越多的女性进入高等教育——占本科学生总数的50%以上——关于高等教育女性化的论述在十多年来的媒体和政策回应中一直很明显。这种女性化理论假设,女性现在不仅在数量上占多数,而且正在改变该体系的文化。因此,从EDI的角度来看,我们可能会认为,至少就女性学生而言,几乎没有什么工作要做。然而,有证据对女性化理论提出质疑。本文通过关注学生的“声音”作为一种有价值的公平和包容策略,对该领域做出了贡献,此外还探讨了如何在精英背景下理解包容。本文在方法上进行了创新,分析了剑桥大学学生出版社在引入性同意研讨会的那一年的情况。根据“空间”的理论框架,本文将探讨学生如何利用学生出版社作为一个“空间”,在这个“空间”中,人们关注女学生的“代表性”空间,以及特定空间与特定身体的耦合。本文将论证并提供证据,证明来自“内部”的批评挑战了平等、多样性和包容性的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信