Linear and Area Coverage With Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Management: International Multidisciplinary Consensus Recommendations

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Devinder Singh, Timothy Alton, Abtin Alvand, Paulo Roberto Barbosa de Toledo, Abhishek Chatterjee, Ellen Dillavou, Risal Djohan, Alba Viviana Gomez Ortega, Andrew Pieri, Bauer Sumpio, Christian Willy, Boris Zelle, H. John Cooper
{"title":"Linear and Area Coverage With Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Management: International Multidisciplinary Consensus Recommendations","authors":"Devinder Singh,&nbsp;Timothy Alton,&nbsp;Abtin Alvand,&nbsp;Paulo Roberto Barbosa de Toledo,&nbsp;Abhishek Chatterjee,&nbsp;Ellen Dillavou,&nbsp;Risal Djohan,&nbsp;Alba Viviana Gomez Ortega,&nbsp;Andrew Pieri,&nbsp;Bauer Sumpio,&nbsp;Christian Willy,&nbsp;Boris Zelle,&nbsp;H. John Cooper","doi":"10.1111/iwj.70677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) with foam dressings has received broad recognition for its ability to support incision healing for a variety of surgical procedures. Over time, these dressings have evolved to include linear and ‘area’ shapes to better conform to different incision types and surface geometries. To address new studies on these configurations and provide guidance for dressing selection, an international, multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened. The panel reviewed recent publications on ciNPT with reticulated open cell foam (ROCF) dressings, shared their cases and experiences and engaged in roundtable discussions on benefits, drawbacks and technical challenges. Topics were ranked by importance and refined into potential consensus statements. These were shared for anonymous feedback, requiring 80% agreement for consensus. This manuscript establishes 12 consensus statements regarding risk factors supporting the use of ciNPT, conditions supporting preference of linear or area ciNPT dressings and tips for practical application of ciNPT with ROCF dressings. While this consensus panel expands on previous publications to aid clinicians' decision-making, further research is needed to refine recommendations and identify the strengths and limitations of ciNPT. Continued multidisciplinary collaboration will ensure ciNPT remains vital for improving surgical outcomes and patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14451,"journal":{"name":"International Wound Journal","volume":"22 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iwj.70677","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Wound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.70677","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) with foam dressings has received broad recognition for its ability to support incision healing for a variety of surgical procedures. Over time, these dressings have evolved to include linear and ‘area’ shapes to better conform to different incision types and surface geometries. To address new studies on these configurations and provide guidance for dressing selection, an international, multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened. The panel reviewed recent publications on ciNPT with reticulated open cell foam (ROCF) dressings, shared their cases and experiences and engaged in roundtable discussions on benefits, drawbacks and technical challenges. Topics were ranked by importance and refined into potential consensus statements. These were shared for anonymous feedback, requiring 80% agreement for consensus. This manuscript establishes 12 consensus statements regarding risk factors supporting the use of ciNPT, conditions supporting preference of linear or area ciNPT dressings and tips for practical application of ciNPT with ROCF dressings. While this consensus panel expands on previous publications to aid clinicians' decision-making, further research is needed to refine recommendations and identify the strengths and limitations of ciNPT. Continued multidisciplinary collaboration will ensure ciNPT remains vital for improving surgical outcomes and patient care.

闭合切口负压治疗管理的线性和区域覆盖:国际多学科共识建议
泡沫敷料闭合切口负压治疗(ciNPT)因其支持各种外科手术切口愈合的能力而得到广泛认可。随着时间的推移,这些敷料已经演变成线性和“区域”形状,以更好地适应不同的切口类型和表面几何形状。为了解决这些配置的新研究并为穿衣选择提供指导,召开了一个国际多学科专家小组。小组回顾了最近关于网状开孔泡沫(ROCF)敷料的ciNPT出版物,分享了他们的案例和经验,并就其优点、缺点和技术挑战进行了圆桌讨论。主题按重要性排序,并提炼成潜在的共识声明。这些都是匿名反馈,需要80%的同意才能达成共识。本文建立了关于支持使用ciNPT的风险因素,支持线性或区域ciNPT敷料的条件以及ciNPT与ROCF敷料的实际应用提示的12个共识声明。虽然这个共识小组扩展了以前的出版物,以帮助临床医生做出决策,但需要进一步的研究来完善建议,并确定ciNPT的优势和局限性。持续的多学科合作将确保ciNPT对改善手术结果和患者护理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Wound Journal
International Wound Journal DERMATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.90%
发文量
266
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Editors welcome papers on all aspects of prevention and treatment of wounds and associated conditions in the fields of surgery, dermatology, oncology, nursing, radiotherapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy and podiatry. The Journal accepts papers in the following categories: - Research papers - Review articles - Clinical studies - Letters - News and Views: international perspectives, education initiatives, guidelines and different activities of groups and societies. Calendar of events The Editors are supported by a board of international experts and a panel of reviewers across a range of disciplines and specialties which ensures only the most current and relevant research is published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信