Safety and Efficacy of S53P4 Bioactive Glass in Osteomyelitis Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Antoinette T. Nguyen, Rena A. Li, Robert D. Galiano
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of S53P4 Bioactive Glass in Osteomyelitis Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Antoinette T. Nguyen,&nbsp;Rena A. Li,&nbsp;Robert D. Galiano","doi":"10.1002/jbm.b.35597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Osteomyelitis remains a difficult-to-treat bone infection due to its high recurrence risk, complex surgical demands, and rising rates of multidrug-resistant organisms. While conventional treatments rely heavily on antibiotic-loaded materials, bioactive glass S53P4 offers a dual-action alternative, combining bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity with bone regenerative potential. A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of S53P4 bioactive glass in osteomyelitis treatment. Twenty-eight studies published between 2000 and 2024, encompassing 1122 patients (mean age: 43.6 years), were included. Outcomes analyzed included infection eradication, recurrence, bone healing, functional recovery, and complications. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I for observational studies and the JBI checklist for case series. A meta-analysis of 10 studies reporting infection eradication at ≥ 12 months was performed using a random-effects model. The pooled infection eradication rate was 88.1% (95% CI: 85.4%–90.4%) with no significant heterogeneity (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). Studies reported consistent efficacy across chronic, diabetic foot, mastoid, and jaw osteomyelitis. S53P4 was effective against polymicrobial and multidrug-resistant infections, including <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>. Healing outcomes were favorable, with high rates of bone integration and return to function. Complications were uncommon and primarily related to soft tissue coverage. Most patients received systemic antibiotics; no studies required local antibiotic-loaded materials alongside S53P4. Bioactive glass S53P4 is a safe and effective adjunct in osteomyelitis management, demonstrating high long-term infection control, robust bone regeneration, and a low complication profile. Its nonantibiotic antimicrobial mechanism makes it particularly suitable in settings of antimicrobial resistance. Future studies should assess its long-term durability and applications in high-risk infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":15269,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","volume":"113 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jbm.b.35597","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35597","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Osteomyelitis remains a difficult-to-treat bone infection due to its high recurrence risk, complex surgical demands, and rising rates of multidrug-resistant organisms. While conventional treatments rely heavily on antibiotic-loaded materials, bioactive glass S53P4 offers a dual-action alternative, combining bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity with bone regenerative potential. A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of S53P4 bioactive glass in osteomyelitis treatment. Twenty-eight studies published between 2000 and 2024, encompassing 1122 patients (mean age: 43.6 years), were included. Outcomes analyzed included infection eradication, recurrence, bone healing, functional recovery, and complications. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I for observational studies and the JBI checklist for case series. A meta-analysis of 10 studies reporting infection eradication at ≥ 12 months was performed using a random-effects model. The pooled infection eradication rate was 88.1% (95% CI: 85.4%–90.4%) with no significant heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). Studies reported consistent efficacy across chronic, diabetic foot, mastoid, and jaw osteomyelitis. S53P4 was effective against polymicrobial and multidrug-resistant infections, including Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Healing outcomes were favorable, with high rates of bone integration and return to function. Complications were uncommon and primarily related to soft tissue coverage. Most patients received systemic antibiotics; no studies required local antibiotic-loaded materials alongside S53P4. Bioactive glass S53P4 is a safe and effective adjunct in osteomyelitis management, demonstrating high long-term infection control, robust bone regeneration, and a low complication profile. Its nonantibiotic antimicrobial mechanism makes it particularly suitable in settings of antimicrobial resistance. Future studies should assess its long-term durability and applications in high-risk infections.

S53P4生物活性玻璃治疗骨髓炎的安全性和有效性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
骨髓炎仍然是一种难以治疗的骨感染,由于其高复发风险,复杂的手术需求,以及多药耐药菌的发病率上升。传统的治疗方法严重依赖抗生素负载材料,而生物活性玻璃S53P4提供了一种双重作用的替代方案,将抑菌和杀菌活性与骨再生潜力相结合。按照PRISMA指南进行系统回顾和meta分析,评价S53P4生物活性玻璃治疗骨髓炎的临床疗效和安全性。纳入了2000年至2024年间发表的28项研究,涉及1122名患者(平均年龄:43.6岁)。结果分析包括感染根除、复发、骨愈合、功能恢复和并发症。观察性研究使用ROBINS-I评估偏倚风险,病例系列使用JBI清单评估偏倚风险。采用随机效应模型对10项报告≥12个月感染根除的研究进行荟萃分析。合并感染根除率为88.1% (95% CI: 85.4% ~ 90.4%),无显著异质性(I2 = 0%)。研究报告了对慢性糖尿病足、乳突和下颌骨髓炎的一致疗效。S53P4对包括金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌在内的多微生物和多重耐药感染有效。愈合结果良好,骨整合和功能恢复率高。并发症不常见,主要与软组织覆盖有关。大多数患者接受全身抗生素治疗;没有研究要求与S53P4一起使用局部抗生素负载材料。生物活性玻璃S53P4在骨髓炎治疗中是一种安全有效的辅助治疗方法,具有长期感染控制能力强、骨再生能力强、并发症低的特点。它的非抗生素抗菌机制使其特别适用于抗菌素耐药性的设置。未来的研究应评估其长期耐久性和在高危感染中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
199
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is a highly interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal serving the needs of biomaterials professionals who design, develop, produce and apply biomaterials and medical devices. It has the common focus of biomaterials applied to the human body and covers all disciplines where medical devices are used. Papers are published on biomaterials related to medical device development and manufacture, degradation in the body, nano- and biomimetic- biomaterials interactions, mechanics of biomaterials, implant retrieval and analysis, tissue-biomaterial surface interactions, wound healing, infection, drug delivery, standards and regulation of devices, animal and pre-clinical studies of biomaterials and medical devices, and tissue-biopolymer-material combination products. Manuscripts are published in one of six formats: • original research reports • short research and development reports • scientific reviews • current concepts articles • special reports • editorials Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials, Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Manuscripts from all countries are invited but must be in English. Authors are not required to be members of the affiliated Societies, but members of these societies are encouraged to submit their work to the journal for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信