Toward Standardisation of Methodologies and Biodiversity Measures for Describing the Microbiome Structure and Diversity of Silages

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Fred Eduardo Hernández-Perea, Eneas Aguirre von Wobeser, Yaxk'in Coronado, Mayra de la Torre
{"title":"Toward Standardisation of Methodologies and Biodiversity Measures for Describing the Microbiome Structure and Diversity of Silages","authors":"Fred Eduardo Hernández-Perea,&nbsp;Eneas Aguirre von Wobeser,&nbsp;Yaxk'in Coronado,&nbsp;Mayra de la Torre","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Ensiling is a widely adopted fermentation method for forage preservation that relies on the dynamic succession of microorganisms; ultimately, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) dominate a successful fermentation. This review conducts a meta-analysis of studies published from 2019 to 2024 and identifies critical gaps in methodological standardisation. The majority of studies focus on traditional temperate forages, while nonconventional tropical forages and agro-industrial residues remain underexplored. In light of climate change and rising temperatures, understanding the impacts of high-temperature ensiling on microbial communities is crucial, as these conditions may increase the alpha diversity of the resulting silage and enhance heterofermentative fermentation. Comparison between studies is impeded by variations in silage technology, DNA extraction protocols, and bioinformatic pipelines. We propose the development of MOCK communities to be shared among laboratories for their inclusion in silage DNA extractions, for rigorous assessments of DNA lysis efficiency, and a shift toward high-resolution clustering approaches (e.g., amplicon sequence variants and, when appropriate, a 99% cutoff). Moreover, the use of Hill numbers is encouraged as a robust alternative for expressing alpha diversity. This review not only synthesises current best practices for microbiome analysis in silages but also provides recommendations for reproducibility and consistency in future research, thereby aiding decision-making to optimise fermentation outcomes.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":"80 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12723","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ensiling is a widely adopted fermentation method for forage preservation that relies on the dynamic succession of microorganisms; ultimately, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) dominate a successful fermentation. This review conducts a meta-analysis of studies published from 2019 to 2024 and identifies critical gaps in methodological standardisation. The majority of studies focus on traditional temperate forages, while nonconventional tropical forages and agro-industrial residues remain underexplored. In light of climate change and rising temperatures, understanding the impacts of high-temperature ensiling on microbial communities is crucial, as these conditions may increase the alpha diversity of the resulting silage and enhance heterofermentative fermentation. Comparison between studies is impeded by variations in silage technology, DNA extraction protocols, and bioinformatic pipelines. We propose the development of MOCK communities to be shared among laboratories for their inclusion in silage DNA extractions, for rigorous assessments of DNA lysis efficiency, and a shift toward high-resolution clustering approaches (e.g., amplicon sequence variants and, when appropriate, a 99% cutoff). Moreover, the use of Hill numbers is encouraged as a robust alternative for expressing alpha diversity. This review not only synthesises current best practices for microbiome analysis in silages but also provides recommendations for reproducibility and consistency in future research, thereby aiding decision-making to optimise fermentation outcomes.

青贮微生物组结构和多样性描述方法和生物多样性措施的标准化研究
青贮是一种广泛采用的依靠微生物动态演替的牧草发酵保存方法;最终,乳酸菌(LAB)主导了成功的发酵。本综述对2019年至2024年发表的研究进行了荟萃分析,并确定了方法标准化方面的关键差距。大多数研究集中在传统的温带牧草上,而非传统的热带牧草和农业工业残留物仍未得到充分的探索。在气候变化和气温上升的背景下,了解高温青贮对微生物群落的影响至关重要,因为这些条件可能会增加青贮的α多样性,并促进异发酵。研究之间的比较受到青贮技术、DNA提取协议和生物信息管道变化的阻碍。我们建议在实验室之间共享模拟群落的开发,以便将其包含在青贮DNA提取中,对DNA裂解效率进行严格评估,并向高分辨率聚类方法转变(例如,扩增子序列变异,适当时,99%的截止)。此外,鼓励使用希尔数作为表达α多样性的可靠替代方法。本综述不仅综合了目前青贮微生物组分析的最佳实践,而且为未来研究的可重复性和一致性提供了建议,从而有助于优化发酵结果的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信