Fred Eduardo Hernández-Perea, Eneas Aguirre von Wobeser, Yaxk'in Coronado, Mayra de la Torre
{"title":"Toward Standardisation of Methodologies and Biodiversity Measures for Describing the Microbiome Structure and Diversity of Silages","authors":"Fred Eduardo Hernández-Perea, Eneas Aguirre von Wobeser, Yaxk'in Coronado, Mayra de la Torre","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Ensiling is a widely adopted fermentation method for forage preservation that relies on the dynamic succession of microorganisms; ultimately, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) dominate a successful fermentation. This review conducts a meta-analysis of studies published from 2019 to 2024 and identifies critical gaps in methodological standardisation. The majority of studies focus on traditional temperate forages, while nonconventional tropical forages and agro-industrial residues remain underexplored. In light of climate change and rising temperatures, understanding the impacts of high-temperature ensiling on microbial communities is crucial, as these conditions may increase the alpha diversity of the resulting silage and enhance heterofermentative fermentation. Comparison between studies is impeded by variations in silage technology, DNA extraction protocols, and bioinformatic pipelines. We propose the development of MOCK communities to be shared among laboratories for their inclusion in silage DNA extractions, for rigorous assessments of DNA lysis efficiency, and a shift toward high-resolution clustering approaches (e.g., amplicon sequence variants and, when appropriate, a 99% cutoff). Moreover, the use of Hill numbers is encouraged as a robust alternative for expressing alpha diversity. This review not only synthesises current best practices for microbiome analysis in silages but also provides recommendations for reproducibility and consistency in future research, thereby aiding decision-making to optimise fermentation outcomes.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":"80 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12723","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ensiling is a widely adopted fermentation method for forage preservation that relies on the dynamic succession of microorganisms; ultimately, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) dominate a successful fermentation. This review conducts a meta-analysis of studies published from 2019 to 2024 and identifies critical gaps in methodological standardisation. The majority of studies focus on traditional temperate forages, while nonconventional tropical forages and agro-industrial residues remain underexplored. In light of climate change and rising temperatures, understanding the impacts of high-temperature ensiling on microbial communities is crucial, as these conditions may increase the alpha diversity of the resulting silage and enhance heterofermentative fermentation. Comparison between studies is impeded by variations in silage technology, DNA extraction protocols, and bioinformatic pipelines. We propose the development of MOCK communities to be shared among laboratories for their inclusion in silage DNA extractions, for rigorous assessments of DNA lysis efficiency, and a shift toward high-resolution clustering approaches (e.g., amplicon sequence variants and, when appropriate, a 99% cutoff). Moreover, the use of Hill numbers is encouraged as a robust alternative for expressing alpha diversity. This review not only synthesises current best practices for microbiome analysis in silages but also provides recommendations for reproducibility and consistency in future research, thereby aiding decision-making to optimise fermentation outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.