Artificial intelligence in forensic mental health: A review of applications and implications

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL
David B. Olawade , Folasayo I. Ayoola , Titus Oloruntoba Ebo , Akinsola J. Asaolu , Eghosasere Egbon , Aanuoluwapo Clement David-Olawade
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in forensic mental health: A review of applications and implications","authors":"David B. Olawade ,&nbsp;Folasayo I. Ayoola ,&nbsp;Titus Oloruntoba Ebo ,&nbsp;Akinsola J. Asaolu ,&nbsp;Eghosasere Egbon ,&nbsp;Aanuoluwapo Clement David-Olawade","doi":"10.1016/j.jflm.2025.102895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This narrative review explores the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) in forensic mental health, focusing on its applications, benefits, limitations, and ethical considerations. AI's capabilities, particularly in areas such as risk assessment, mental health screening, behavioral analysis, and treatment recommendations, present promising advancements for accuracy, efficiency, and objectivity in forensic evaluations. Predictive models and natural language processing enhance the precision of high-stakes assessments, enabling early intervention and optimized resource allocation. However, AI's integration in forensic mental health also brings significant challenges, particularly regarding data quality, algorithmic bias, transparency, and legal accountability. Limited access to high-quality, representative data can hinder reliability, while biases within AI models risk perpetuating existing disparities. Ethical concerns surrounding data privacy and the “black box” nature of many AI algorithms underscore the need for transparency and accountability. The review highlights future directions for responsible AI use, including improving data standards, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, and establishing robust regulatory frameworks to safeguard ethical and fair AI applications in forensic settings. Balancing technological innovation with ethical considerations and legal obligations is essential to ensure AI supports justice and upholds public trust. This review calls for ongoing research, policy development, and cautious implementation to harness AI's potential while protecting individuals' rights within the justice system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic and legal medicine","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 102895"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic and legal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X25000964","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This narrative review explores the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) in forensic mental health, focusing on its applications, benefits, limitations, and ethical considerations. AI's capabilities, particularly in areas such as risk assessment, mental health screening, behavioral analysis, and treatment recommendations, present promising advancements for accuracy, efficiency, and objectivity in forensic evaluations. Predictive models and natural language processing enhance the precision of high-stakes assessments, enabling early intervention and optimized resource allocation. However, AI's integration in forensic mental health also brings significant challenges, particularly regarding data quality, algorithmic bias, transparency, and legal accountability. Limited access to high-quality, representative data can hinder reliability, while biases within AI models risk perpetuating existing disparities. Ethical concerns surrounding data privacy and the “black box” nature of many AI algorithms underscore the need for transparency and accountability. The review highlights future directions for responsible AI use, including improving data standards, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, and establishing robust regulatory frameworks to safeguard ethical and fair AI applications in forensic settings. Balancing technological innovation with ethical considerations and legal obligations is essential to ensure AI supports justice and upholds public trust. This review calls for ongoing research, policy development, and cautious implementation to harness AI's potential while protecting individuals' rights within the justice system.
人工智能在法医心理健康中的应用及其影响
本文探讨了人工智能(AI)在法医心理健康方面的变革作用,重点关注其应用、益处、局限性和伦理考虑。人工智能的能力,特别是在风险评估、心理健康筛查、行为分析和治疗建议等领域,为法医评估的准确性、效率和客观性带来了有希望的进步。预测模型和自然语言处理提高了高风险评估的准确性,使早期干预和优化资源分配成为可能。然而,人工智能与法医心理健康的融合也带来了重大挑战,特别是在数据质量、算法偏见、透明度和法律问责制方面。对高质量、代表性数据的有限获取可能会影响可靠性,而人工智能模型中的偏见可能会使现有的差距永久化。围绕数据隐私和许多人工智能算法的“黑箱”性质的伦理担忧,突显了透明度和问责制的必要性。该审查强调了负责任的人工智能使用的未来方向,包括改进数据标准,促进跨学科合作,建立健全的监管框架,以保障在法医环境中道德和公平的人工智能应用。平衡技术创新与道德考虑和法律义务对于确保人工智能支持司法和维护公众信任至关重要。这一审查要求继续进行研究、制定政策和谨慎实施,以利用人工智能的潜力,同时在司法系统内保护个人权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
106
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine publishes topical articles on aspects of forensic and legal medicine. Specifically the Journal supports research that explores the medical principles of care and forensic assessment of individuals, whether adult or child, in contact with the judicial system. It is a fully peer-review hybrid journal with a broad international perspective. The Journal accepts submissions of original research, review articles, and pertinent case studies, editorials, and commentaries in relevant areas of Forensic and Legal Medicine, Context of Practice, and Education and Training. The Journal adheres to strict publication ethical guidelines, and actively supports a culture of inclusive and representative publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信