Design of solar fields for Concentrated Solar Power plants considering operation & maintenance activities

IF 6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Chiara Lupi , Cody B. Anderson , Giovanni Picotti , Michael E. Cholette , Giampaolo Manzolini
{"title":"Design of solar fields for Concentrated Solar Power plants considering operation & maintenance activities","authors":"Chiara Lupi ,&nbsp;Cody B. Anderson ,&nbsp;Giovanni Picotti ,&nbsp;Michael E. Cholette ,&nbsp;Giampaolo Manzolini","doi":"10.1016/j.solener.2025.113564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Properly sizing the solar field in Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plants is crucial for their economic performance. Current techniques overlook operation and maintenance (O&amp;M) costs which can significantly affect the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), and fail to incorporate key O&amp;M-related productivity losses, such as heliostat failures and soiling, within their productivity models. This study presents an approach for designing the solar power plant including O&amp;M costs for heliostats repair and cleaning, concurrently identifying the optimal deployment of cleaning resources. The developed methodology is applied for a modular solar tower plant in Mount Isa, Australia, where the solar field size that minimizes the LCOE is identified, simultaneously optimizing the power block (PB) and the thermal energy storage (TES) capacity.</div><div>The outcomes of the analysis show that including O&amp;M expenses due to heliostats repair and cleaning leads to a larger solar field: the optimal design for the <em>LCOE scenario</em> features a 22<!--> <!-->% oversize. This configuration is paired with a PB of 32<!--> <!-->MW and a TES of 1326<!--> <!-->MW<!--> <!-->h-14.5<!--> <!-->h, significantly smaller than the 56<!--> <!-->MW, 2320<!--> <!-->MW<!--> <!-->h-14.5<!--> <!-->h reference. In the <em>grid-driven scenario</em>, the optimal solar field is also oversized by 22<!--> <!-->%, with a PB of 56<!--> <!-->MW matching the reference size, and a smaller 1520<!--> <!-->MW<!--> <!-->h-9.5<!--> <!-->h TES. This methodology emphasizes the impact of O&amp;M activities on plant design, alongside the influence of turbine operation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":428,"journal":{"name":"Solar Energy","volume":"297 ","pages":"Article 113564"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092X25003275","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Properly sizing the solar field in Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plants is crucial for their economic performance. Current techniques overlook operation and maintenance (O&M) costs which can significantly affect the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), and fail to incorporate key O&M-related productivity losses, such as heliostat failures and soiling, within their productivity models. This study presents an approach for designing the solar power plant including O&M costs for heliostats repair and cleaning, concurrently identifying the optimal deployment of cleaning resources. The developed methodology is applied for a modular solar tower plant in Mount Isa, Australia, where the solar field size that minimizes the LCOE is identified, simultaneously optimizing the power block (PB) and the thermal energy storage (TES) capacity.
The outcomes of the analysis show that including O&M expenses due to heliostats repair and cleaning leads to a larger solar field: the optimal design for the LCOE scenario features a 22 % oversize. This configuration is paired with a PB of 32 MW and a TES of 1326 MW h-14.5 h, significantly smaller than the 56 MW, 2320 MW h-14.5 h reference. In the grid-driven scenario, the optimal solar field is also oversized by 22 %, with a PB of 56 MW matching the reference size, and a smaller 1520 MW h-9.5 h TES. This methodology emphasizes the impact of O&M activities on plant design, alongside the influence of turbine operation.
考虑运维的聚光太阳能电站太阳能场设计
聚光太阳能(CSP)电站的太阳能场大小对其经济效益至关重要。目前的技术忽略了运营和维护(o&m)成本,这些成本会显著影响电力平准化成本(LCOE),并且未能将与运营和维护相关的关键生产力损失(如定日镜故障和污染)纳入其生产力模型。本研究提出了一种考虑定日镜维修和清洁成本的太阳能电站设计方法,同时确定清洁资源的最佳配置。开发的方法应用于澳大利亚Mount Isa的模块化太阳能塔式发电厂,在那里确定了最小化LCOE的太阳能场大小,同时优化了电源块(PB)和热能储存(TES)容量。分析结果表明,包括定日镜维修和清洁费用在内,将导致更大的太阳能场:LCOE方案的最佳设计具有22%的超大尺寸。该配置的PB为32 MW, TES为1326 MW h-14.5 h,明显小于参考的56 MW和2320 MW h-14.5 h。在电网驱动的情况下,最佳太阳能场也扩大了22%,PB为56兆瓦,与参考尺寸相匹配,并且较小的1520兆瓦h-9.5小时TES。这种方法强调运营管理活动对工厂设计的影响,以及涡轮机运行的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Solar Energy
Solar Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
9.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Solar Energy welcomes manuscripts presenting information not previously published in journals on any aspect of solar energy research, development, application, measurement or policy. The term "solar energy" in this context includes the indirect uses such as wind energy and biomass
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信