Out of office: A diary study on remote work's impact on well-being through psychological basic needs

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Jana Sophie Kesenheimer , Beril Fidan , Andreas Kastenmüller , Tobias Greitemeyer
{"title":"Out of office: A diary study on remote work's impact on well-being through psychological basic needs","authors":"Jana Sophie Kesenheimer ,&nbsp;Beril Fidan ,&nbsp;Andreas Kastenmüller ,&nbsp;Tobias Greitemeyer","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explored the impact of remote work on well-being through self-determination theory, which highlights the importance of fulfilling psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Data were gathered from 85 employees in city administration through 605 daily assessments over a two-week period. The results indicated that remote work positively affected well-being by fulfilling employees' needs for autonomy and competence. While it led to a decrease in feelings of relatedness, this decline did not negatively influence overall well-being. Furthermore, the increase in well-being driven by greater autonomy and competence was associated with enhanced helping behavior toward colleagues. Given that these results were significant at the within- (but not between-) person level, the findings suggest that a hybrid model combining remote and office work may be the most effective strategy for enhancing employee well-being - and, in turn, promoting pro-social behavior in the workplace.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 105085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825003981","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored the impact of remote work on well-being through self-determination theory, which highlights the importance of fulfilling psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Data were gathered from 85 employees in city administration through 605 daily assessments over a two-week period. The results indicated that remote work positively affected well-being by fulfilling employees' needs for autonomy and competence. While it led to a decrease in feelings of relatedness, this decline did not negatively influence overall well-being. Furthermore, the increase in well-being driven by greater autonomy and competence was associated with enhanced helping behavior toward colleagues. Given that these results were significant at the within- (but not between-) person level, the findings suggest that a hybrid model combining remote and office work may be the most effective strategy for enhancing employee well-being - and, in turn, promoting pro-social behavior in the workplace.
不在办公室:一项关于远程工作通过心理基本需求对幸福感影响的日记研究
本研究通过自我决定理论探讨了远程工作对幸福感的影响,该理论强调了满足自主、能力和关系心理需求的重要性。在为期两周的时间里,通过605次每日评估收集了85名城市管理人员的数据。结果表明,远程工作通过满足员工的自主性和胜任力需求而对幸福感产生积极影响。虽然它会导致亲缘感的下降,但这种下降并不会对整体幸福感产生负面影响。此外,由更大的自主性和能力驱动的幸福感的增加与对同事的帮助行为的增强有关。考虑到这些结果在内部(而不是人与人之间)的层面上是显著的,研究结果表明,将远程和办公室工作结合起来的混合模式可能是提高员工幸福感的最有效策略,反过来,促进工作场所的亲社会行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信