Chang Yu , Erman Xia , Xinyue Zhu , Zixing Gao , Di Shang , Qiong Wu , Chao Yang
{"title":"Differential industrial structures and the impact on timber carbon stocks: A comparative study of China, the United States, and Canada","authors":"Chang Yu , Erman Xia , Xinyue Zhu , Zixing Gao , Di Shang , Qiong Wu , Chao Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the largest terrestrial carbon sink, forests regulate global carbon cycling, with timber providing long-term carbon storage for climate mitigation. This study analyzes consumption-based timber carbon stock flows in China, the U.S., and Canada, focusing on their roles in the global timber trade and sectoral linkages. China’s timber supply chain is dependent on imported timber carbon stocks, particularly for downstream sectors such as construction and furniture manufacturing. In contrast, the U.S. exhibits an integrated system, consistently managing its domestic timber carbon stocks across various industries. Canada, as a major timber exporter, plays a critical role in transferring timber carbon stocks, especially to the U.S., reflecting its strong outward linkages. This comparative analysis enhances understanding of timber carbon stock dynamics in trade, providing insights for supply chain optimization. Strengthened cooperation among China, the U.S., and Canada is essential for enhancing forest-based climate mitigation and accelerating carbon neutrality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 108402"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925002800","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As the largest terrestrial carbon sink, forests regulate global carbon cycling, with timber providing long-term carbon storage for climate mitigation. This study analyzes consumption-based timber carbon stock flows in China, the U.S., and Canada, focusing on their roles in the global timber trade and sectoral linkages. China’s timber supply chain is dependent on imported timber carbon stocks, particularly for downstream sectors such as construction and furniture manufacturing. In contrast, the U.S. exhibits an integrated system, consistently managing its domestic timber carbon stocks across various industries. Canada, as a major timber exporter, plays a critical role in transferring timber carbon stocks, especially to the U.S., reflecting its strong outward linkages. This comparative analysis enhances understanding of timber carbon stock dynamics in trade, providing insights for supply chain optimization. Strengthened cooperation among China, the U.S., and Canada is essential for enhancing forest-based climate mitigation and accelerating carbon neutrality.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.