Impediment ranking and solutions for enhancing electric freight vehicle uptake in urban logistics

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Aalok Kumar , Pooja Goel , Sunil Tiwari
{"title":"Impediment ranking and solutions for enhancing electric freight vehicle uptake in urban logistics","authors":"Aalok Kumar ,&nbsp;Pooja Goel ,&nbsp;Sunil Tiwari","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The adoption of electric freight vehicles (EFVs) is integral to achieving sustainable urban freight mobility (UFM); however, their large-scale deployment remains constrained by a number of financial, infrastructural, regulatory, policy, and operational barriers. This study employs a robust multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework, which integrates fuzzy Delphi, decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL), and interpretive structural modelling (ISM), to systematically identify, rank, and link critical barriers to EFV deployment. Through an initial literature review and expert-driven assessment, we identify 18 barriers, which are subsequently refined to 13 based on their significance and interrelationships. The results highlight six dominant causal barriers, including inadequate government incentives, unstructured urban market layouts, and high operational costs with prolonged payback periods, all of which create systemic resistance to EFV adoption. Additionally, limited charging infrastructure, an immature EFV resale market, and a lack of dedicated repair centres exacerbate the reluctance of logistics service providers to transition to EFVs. The study also categorizes these barriers into four strategic clusters based on their driving and dependence power, offering a novel hierarchical decision roadmap to facilitate effective policy interventions. Advancing existing DEMATEL methodologies, this research contributes to the discourse on sustainable urban logistics by providing an empirically validated, analytically rigorous framework that informs policymakers, logistics service providers, and urban planners in devising effective strategies for EFV integration. The proposed model facilitates strategic decision-making for achieving low-carbon urban freight systems and offers a scalable approach that is applicable to diverse urban contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 108604"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325004311","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adoption of electric freight vehicles (EFVs) is integral to achieving sustainable urban freight mobility (UFM); however, their large-scale deployment remains constrained by a number of financial, infrastructural, regulatory, policy, and operational barriers. This study employs a robust multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework, which integrates fuzzy Delphi, decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL), and interpretive structural modelling (ISM), to systematically identify, rank, and link critical barriers to EFV deployment. Through an initial literature review and expert-driven assessment, we identify 18 barriers, which are subsequently refined to 13 based on their significance and interrelationships. The results highlight six dominant causal barriers, including inadequate government incentives, unstructured urban market layouts, and high operational costs with prolonged payback periods, all of which create systemic resistance to EFV adoption. Additionally, limited charging infrastructure, an immature EFV resale market, and a lack of dedicated repair centres exacerbate the reluctance of logistics service providers to transition to EFVs. The study also categorizes these barriers into four strategic clusters based on their driving and dependence power, offering a novel hierarchical decision roadmap to facilitate effective policy interventions. Advancing existing DEMATEL methodologies, this research contributes to the discourse on sustainable urban logistics by providing an empirically validated, analytically rigorous framework that informs policymakers, logistics service providers, and urban planners in devising effective strategies for EFV integration. The proposed model facilitates strategic decision-making for achieving low-carbon urban freight systems and offers a scalable approach that is applicable to diverse urban contexts.
城市物流中提高电动货车使用率的障碍排序及解决方案
采用电动货运车辆(efv)是实现可持续城市货运机动性(UFM)不可或缺的一部分;然而,它们的大规模部署仍然受到许多金融、基础设施、监管、政策和操作障碍的限制。本研究采用了一个强大的多准则决策分析(MCDA)框架,该框架集成了模糊德尔菲、决策试验和评估实验室(DEMATEL)和解释结构模型(ISM),以系统地识别、排序和链接EFV部署的关键障碍。通过最初的文献回顾和专家驱动的评估,我们确定了18个障碍,随后根据其重要性和相互关系将其细化为13个。研究结果强调了六个主要的因果障碍,包括政府激励措施不足、非结构化的城市市场布局、高运营成本和较长的投资回收期,所有这些都对EFV的采用造成了系统性阻力。此外,充电基础设施有限,电动汽车转售市场不成熟,以及缺乏专门的维修中心,这些都加剧了物流服务提供商不愿向电动汽车转型的原因。研究还根据壁垒的驱动和依赖程度将其划分为四个战略集群,为促进有效的政策干预提供了一种新的分层决策路线图。本研究推进了现有的DEMATEL方法,通过提供一个经验验证的、分析严谨的框架,为政策制定者、物流服务提供商和城市规划者制定有效的EFV整合策略,为可持续城市物流的论述做出了贡献。提出的模型有助于实现低碳城市货运系统的战略决策,并提供适用于不同城市环境的可扩展方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信