Dynamic control of upper limit for rainfall storing and effective use in rice paddies based on improved AquaCrop model

IF 5.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
En Lin , Rangjian Qiu , Xinxin Li , Mengting Chen , Shizong Zheng , Fei Ren , Xiaoming Xiang , Chenglong Ji , Yuanlai Cui , Yufeng Luo
{"title":"Dynamic control of upper limit for rainfall storing and effective use in rice paddies based on improved AquaCrop model","authors":"En Lin ,&nbsp;Rangjian Qiu ,&nbsp;Xinxin Li ,&nbsp;Mengting Chen ,&nbsp;Shizong Zheng ,&nbsp;Fei Ren ,&nbsp;Xiaoming Xiang ,&nbsp;Chenglong Ji ,&nbsp;Yuanlai Cui ,&nbsp;Yufeng Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Increasing the upper limit of rainfall storage to enhance rainfall utilization is an important approach for conserving irrigation water in rice production while also avoiding yield losses caused by excessive flooding depth and prolonged inundation. However, traditional static water level control methods, which apply fixed storage limits at different growth stages, often fail to align with the dynamic nature of rainfall and crop water demand, leading to inefficiencies and increased waterlogging risk. This study proposed a dynamic rainfall storage control strategy based on 1–7-day weather forecasts. To evaluate its effectiveness, the AquaCrop model was modified by incorporating a waterlogging stress coefficient, resulting in the ACOP-FRice model. The model accurately simulated rice yield under various waterlogging conditions and demonstrated strong stability across growth stages. During the validation period, the late tillering stage showed the best performance of yield simulation accuracy, with a normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 7.39 %, and both the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) and nash-sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) coefficient values reaching 0.83. Although the heading–flowering stage was the most sensitive to flooding, the model still achieved reasonable accuracy, with an NRMSE of 11.61 % and R² and NSE values of 0.81, indicating its ability to capture yield variations under complex stress conditions. Compared to static control, the dynamic strategies HP1, HP2, and HP3 increased rainfall use efficiency by 10.90–17.84 % and reduced drainage by 3.90–19.30 % for early rice, 3.10–12.00 % for mid-season rice, and 21.91–25.44 % for late rice. Yield losses across all scenarios remained below 3.00 %, confirming the strategy’s potential to optimize water management while minimizing adverse impacts on yield.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7634,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Water Management","volume":"316 ","pages":"Article 109569"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Water Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425002835","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasing the upper limit of rainfall storage to enhance rainfall utilization is an important approach for conserving irrigation water in rice production while also avoiding yield losses caused by excessive flooding depth and prolonged inundation. However, traditional static water level control methods, which apply fixed storage limits at different growth stages, often fail to align with the dynamic nature of rainfall and crop water demand, leading to inefficiencies and increased waterlogging risk. This study proposed a dynamic rainfall storage control strategy based on 1–7-day weather forecasts. To evaluate its effectiveness, the AquaCrop model was modified by incorporating a waterlogging stress coefficient, resulting in the ACOP-FRice model. The model accurately simulated rice yield under various waterlogging conditions and demonstrated strong stability across growth stages. During the validation period, the late tillering stage showed the best performance of yield simulation accuracy, with a normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 7.39 %, and both the coefficient of determination (R2) and nash-sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) coefficient values reaching 0.83. Although the heading–flowering stage was the most sensitive to flooding, the model still achieved reasonable accuracy, with an NRMSE of 11.61 % and R² and NSE values of 0.81, indicating its ability to capture yield variations under complex stress conditions. Compared to static control, the dynamic strategies HP1, HP2, and HP3 increased rainfall use efficiency by 10.90–17.84 % and reduced drainage by 3.90–19.30 % for early rice, 3.10–12.00 % for mid-season rice, and 21.91–25.44 % for late rice. Yield losses across all scenarios remained below 3.00 %, confirming the strategy’s potential to optimize water management while minimizing adverse impacts on yield.
基于改进AquaCrop模型的稻田蓄雨及有效利用上限动态控制
提高蓄水量上限,提高降雨利用率,是节约灌溉用水的重要途径,也是避免因淹水深度过大、淹没时间过长而造成产量损失的重要途径。然而,传统的静态水位控制方法在不同的生长阶段采用固定的存储限制,往往不能与降雨和作物需水量的动态特性相匹配,导致效率低下,内涝风险增加。本研究提出一种基于1 - 7天天气预报的动态蓄水量控制策略。为了评估其有效性,对AquaCrop模型进行了修改,加入了内涝应力系数,得到了ACOP-FRice模型。该模型准确地模拟了不同涝渍条件下的水稻产量,并表现出较强的跨生育期稳定性。在验证期内,分蘖后期产量模拟精度表现最佳,标准化均方根误差(NRMSE)为7.39 %,决定系数(R2)和纳什-萨特克里夫效率(NSE)系数均达到0.83。尽管抽穗期和花期对洪水最敏感,但该模型仍具有合理的精度,NRMSE为11.61 %,R²和NSE值为0.81,表明该模型能够捕捉复杂胁迫条件下的产量变化。与静态对照相比,HP1、HP2和HP3动态处理使早稻、中稻和晚稻的降雨利用效率分别提高10.90 ~ 17.84 %、3.90 ~ 19.30 %、3.10 ~ 12.00 %和21.91 ~ 25.44 %。所有情况下的产量损失均低于3.00 %,证实了该策略在优化水资源管理的同时最大限度地减少对产量的不利影响的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Water Management
Agricultural Water Management 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
14.90%
发文量
648
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Water Management publishes papers of international significance relating to the science, economics, and policy of agricultural water management. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding agricultural water management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信