Exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and IARC carcinogen assessment: Risk of Bias preliminary literature assessment for 10 key characteristics of human carcinogens
IF 6.4 2区 医学Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Myrtill Simkó , Michael H. Repacholi , Kenneth R. Foster , Mats-Olof Mattsson , Rodney J. Croft , Maria Rosaria Scarfi , Vijayalaxmi
{"title":"Exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and IARC carcinogen assessment: Risk of Bias preliminary literature assessment for 10 key characteristics of human carcinogens","authors":"Myrtill Simkó , Michael H. Repacholi , Kenneth R. Foster , Mats-Olof Mattsson , Rodney J. Croft , Maria Rosaria Scarfi , Vijayalaxmi","doi":"10.1016/j.mrrev.2025.108545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This is the first assessment of evidence needed to determine whether exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) exposures, below the levels recommended in the ICNIRP (2020) guidelines, can influence any of the ten key characteristics (KCs) of human carcinogens developed by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). We define the 10 KCs and their relevance to carcinogenesis; review in vivo and in vitro studies relevant to the KCs; and conduct a risk of bias (RoB) analysis using 6 criteria. We did not include KC studies on genotoxicity or oxidative stress since Romeo et al. (2024) and Meyer et al. (2024) recently published relevant systematic reviews, but note their respective conclusions. From the other 8 KCs we identified 119 in vitro and 40 in vitro measurements of in vivo studies through 30 June 2023, with 38 % reporting statistically significant effects of exposure. We identified a strong association between the quality of study and outcome, with those meeting more RoB criteria less likely to report statistically significant effects. Effects were reported over the entire frequency range, exposure levels, and biological endpoints with no apparent pattern of exposure parameters resulting in effects. Only KC10 (alters cell proliferation, cell death or nutrient supply) has sufficient studies to analyse, but the other KCs had few studies and diverse endpoints. A few relatively high-quality positive studies require follow-up through additional targeted studies. The heterogeneity and overall poor study quality suggest the need for high-quality studies on these endpoints, preferably adhering to standards such as the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [28].</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49789,"journal":{"name":"Mutation Research-Reviews in Mutation Research","volume":"796 ","pages":"Article 108545"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutation Research-Reviews in Mutation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138357422500016X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This is the first assessment of evidence needed to determine whether exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) exposures, below the levels recommended in the ICNIRP (2020) guidelines, can influence any of the ten key characteristics (KCs) of human carcinogens developed by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). We define the 10 KCs and their relevance to carcinogenesis; review in vivo and in vitro studies relevant to the KCs; and conduct a risk of bias (RoB) analysis using 6 criteria. We did not include KC studies on genotoxicity or oxidative stress since Romeo et al. (2024) and Meyer et al. (2024) recently published relevant systematic reviews, but note their respective conclusions. From the other 8 KCs we identified 119 in vitro and 40 in vitro measurements of in vivo studies through 30 June 2023, with 38 % reporting statistically significant effects of exposure. We identified a strong association between the quality of study and outcome, with those meeting more RoB criteria less likely to report statistically significant effects. Effects were reported over the entire frequency range, exposure levels, and biological endpoints with no apparent pattern of exposure parameters resulting in effects. Only KC10 (alters cell proliferation, cell death or nutrient supply) has sufficient studies to analyse, but the other KCs had few studies and diverse endpoints. A few relatively high-quality positive studies require follow-up through additional targeted studies. The heterogeneity and overall poor study quality suggest the need for high-quality studies on these endpoints, preferably adhering to standards such as the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [28].
这是为确定低于ICNIRP(2020)指南建议水平的射频电磁场(RF-EMF)暴露是否会影响国际癌症研究机构(IARC)制定的人类致癌物十大关键特征(KCs)中的任何一种所需证据的首次评估。我们定义了10种KCs及其与癌变的相关性;回顾与KCs相关的体内和体外研究;并使用6个标准进行偏倚风险(RoB)分析。由于Romeo et al.(2024)和Meyer et al.(2024)最近发表了相关的系统综述,我们没有纳入关于遗传毒性或氧化应激的KC研究,但请注意他们各自的结论。从其他8个KCs中,我们确定了截至2023年6月30日的119个体外和40个体内研究的体外测量,其中38% %报告了统计显着的暴露效应。我们发现研究质量和结果之间存在很强的相关性,那些符合更多RoB标准的研究不太可能报告统计上显著的效果。效应在整个频率范围、暴露水平和生物终点均有报道,没有明显的暴露参数模式导致效应。只有KC10(改变细胞增殖、细胞死亡或营养供应)有足够的研究来分析,但其他KCs的研究很少,终点也不同。一些相对高质量的阳性研究需要通过额外的针对性研究进行随访。异质性和总体较差的研究质量表明,需要对这些终点进行高质量的研究,最好遵循经济合作与发展组织(oecd)等标准。
期刊介绍:
The subject areas of Reviews in Mutation Research encompass the entire spectrum of the science of mutation research and its applications, with particular emphasis on the relationship between mutation and disease. Thus this section will cover advances in human genome research (including evolving technologies for mutation detection and functional genomics) with applications in clinical genetics, gene therapy and health risk assessment for environmental agents of concern.